Last updated: 2026-05-15

KIA vs Mazda: Reliability Compared

Comparing KIA and Mazda on reliability? This page compares their scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs across every model we track.

Mazda currently leads with an average score of 73/100 compared to 72/100. Scroll down for the full breakdown.

Is KIA More Reliable Than Mazda?

MetricKIAMazda
Avg Reliability Score72/10073/100
Models Tracked96
Avg Recalls per Model1716
Avg Complaints per Model709519
Avg Annual Repair Cost$492/yr$487/yr

KIA Models

9 models ranked by reliability

K573
EV657
Excellent Good Mixed Risky

Mazda Models

6 models ranked by reliability

377
576
Excellent Good Mixed Risky

KIA vs Mazda: The Verdict

Mazda edges out KIA on reliability, though both makes have solid options. Across 9 KIA and 6 Mazda models, Mazda averages 73/100 to 72/100 — a 1-point gap built from NHTSA recalls, owner complaints, and independent repair cost data.

On the cost front, Mazda is cheaper to maintain at $487/year versus $492/year.

Where KIA and Mazda Differ Most

Our reliability score is built from four weighted components. Here's how each make performs in each area:

ComponentWeightKIAMazda
Complaint Severity

Owner complaints weighted by component severity

35%
63/100Good
67/100Good
Repair Costs

Annual maintenance and repair expenses

30%
74/100Good
71/100Good
Recall Impact

Safety recalls weighted by severity (park-it, park-outside)

20%
76/100Good
80/100Excellent
Issue Diversity

How many different systems have reported problems

15%
83/100Excellent
81/100Excellent

KIA vs Mazda: Strengths and Weaknesses

KIA

Strengths

  • Strong overall reliability (72/100 average)
  • Minimal recall impact — fewer safety-critical recalls
  • Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
  • Very affordable maintenance ($492/year avg)
  • 8 of 9 models rated Good or Excellent
  • Below-average repair frequency

Weaknesses

  • 137 fire-related complaints across lineup
  • Above-average repair severity when issues occur

Mazda

Strengths

  • Strong overall reliability (73/100 average)
  • Minimal recall impact — fewer safety-critical recalls
  • Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
  • Very affordable maintenance ($487/year avg)
  • 5 of 6 models rated Good or Excellent
  • Below-average repair frequency

Weaknesses

  • Above-average repair severity when issues occur

How Reliable Are KIA and Mazda Lineups?

Distribution of model reliability ratings across each make's lineup:

KIA

Excellent (80+)2 models
Good (60–79)6 models
Mixed (40–59)1 model
Poor (0–39)0 models

Mazda

Excellent (80+)1 model
Good (60–79)4 models
Mixed (40–59)1 model
Poor (0–39)0 models

Which Make Is Cheaper to Maintain: KIA or Mazda?

Based on independent repair cost data, Mazda is cheaper to maintain at an average of $487/year compared to $492/year for KIA. The difference is relatively small, so maintenance costs shouldn't be a major deciding factor between these makes.

KIA Repair Cost Range

$437 – $573/yr

Average: $492/yr

Mazda Repair Cost Range

$433 – $581/yr

Average: $487/yr

KIA vs Mazda Reliability by Vehicle Type

How the two makes compare within each vehicle category they both compete in:

CategoryKIAMazdaWinner
SUVs(6 vs 4 models)71/10066/100KIA
Sedans(2 vs 2 models)73/10077/100Mazda

The makes split categories evenly at 11.

Common Problems: KIA vs Mazda

Top complaint categories from NHTSA owner reports, showing what drivers report most frequently for each make:

ComponentKIAMazda
ENGINE19%1,09826%665
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM19%1,05216%414
UNKNOWN OR OTHER16%91412%322
POWER TRAIN14%81611%287
VISIBILITY/WIPER6%3142%63
STEERING4%2226%148
SERVICE BRAKES3%1626%168
EXTERIOR LIGHTING4%2251%27
AIR BAGS3%1514%101
STRUCTURE3%1793%68

Percentage of total complaints. Raw complaint count shown below. Based on NHTSA owner reports across all tracked model years.

KIA vs Mazda Complaint Severity: Crashes, Fires, and Injuries

Across all tracked models, KIA owners reported 293 crash-related, 137 fire-related, and 295 injury-related complaints to NHTSA. Mazda owners reported 189 crash-related, 14 fire-related, and 116 injury-related complaints. Mazda has fewer severe incident reports overall. These counts reflect owner-reported incidents and don't establish causation — but they're a useful signal for comparing safety profiles.

KIA

293

Crash reports

137

Fire reports

295

Injury reports

Mazda

189

Crash reports

14

Fire reports

116

Injury reports

Every KIA and Mazda Model Ranked

All tracked models ranked by average reliability score. Click any model for detailed year-by-year data.

KIA vs Mazda Reliability Trend by Year

Average reliability score for each model year, showing how quality has trended over time:

KIA's reliability has been stable across the years we track. Mazda's reliability has been stable.

Both makes are trending stable in recent model years — neither is pulling away.

Model YearKIAMazdaEdge
202579/100(7)72/100(6)KIA
202475/100(7)69/100(6)KIA
202369/100(8)74/100(5)Mazda
202270/100(8)79/100(4)Mazda
202173/100(7)73/100(4)Tie
202071/100(6)75/100(3)Mazda
201972/100(5)75/100(3)Mazda
201871/100(5)74/100(3)Mazda

Number in parentheses = models tracked for that year. Scores are averages across all tracked models.

KIA vs Mazda: Head-to-Head Model Matchups

These are direct competitor models between KIA and Mazda. Click any matchup for a detailed model-vs-model reliability comparison:

The Bottom Line: KIA or Mazda?

Mazda comes out ahead on the numbers, though both makes can serve you well if you pick the right model.

If you want the single most reliable option: the KIA Carnival leads both lineups with a score of 83/100.

Budget-conscious buyers should note that Mazda costs less to maintain — $487/year vs $492/year.

All scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data combined with independent repair cost databases. Check individual model pages for year-specific reliability data before making a final decision.

KIA vs Mazda: Common Questions

Is KIA more reliable than Mazda?
Based on our data, Mazda is more reliable overall with an average reliability score of 73/100 compared to 72/100. The difference is modest, so both makes are reasonable choices.
Which is cheaper to maintain, KIA or Mazda?
Based on independent repair cost estimates, Mazda is cheaper to maintain at an average of $487/year compared to $492/year for KIA.
Which make has more recalls, KIA or Mazda?
On a per-model average, KIA has more recalls (~17 per model) compared to Mazda (~16 per model). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — many are minor or preventative.
What are the most reliable models from KIA and Mazda?
The most reliable KIA model is the Carnival (avg score: 83/100), while the most reliable Mazda model is the CX-5 (avg score: 81/100).
What are the least reliable models from KIA and Mazda?
The least reliable KIA model is the EV6 (avg score: 57/100), while the least reliable Mazda model is the CX-90 (avg score: 51/100). Check individual model pages for year-specific data before ruling these out.
What are the most common problems with KIA and Mazda vehicles?
The most frequently reported issue for KIA is engine (19% of complaints), while for Mazda it's engine (26% of complaints). These are based on NHTSA owner complaint data across all tracked models.
Which make has more reliable models overall, KIA or Mazda?
KIA has a higher proportion of models scoring "good" or "excellent." KIA has 2 excellent and 6 good-rated models out of 9, while Mazda has 1 excellent and 4 good-rated models out of 6.
How many KIA and Mazda models does Auto Reliability Index track?
We track 9 KIA models across 8 model years and 6 Mazda models across 8 model years. Scores are based on NHTSA recalls, owner complaints, and independent repair cost data.
Which make has fewer owner complaints, KIA or Mazda?
On a per-model average, Mazda has fewer owner complaints (~519 per model) compared to KIA (~709 per model). Note that models with higher sales naturally generate more complaints.
Are KIA and Mazda getting more or less reliable?
Based on recent model year data, KIA reliability is stable while Mazda reliability is stable. We compare average scores across the most recent 3 model years to determine the trend direction.
Which is better for a first-time car buyer, KIA or Mazda?
For first-time buyers prioritizing reliability, Mazda has a slight edge with its higher average score. However, specific model choice matters more than make — check individual model pages for the best options in your budget and vehicle type.
Which make has fewer safety-related complaints, KIA or Mazda?
Mazda has fewer owner-reported crashes, fires, and injuries in our database. KIA has 293 crash reports, 137 fire reports, and 295 injury reports. Mazda has 189 crash, 14 fire, and 116 injury reports. Note that complaint volume correlates with sales volume.

Comparing KIA vs Mazda? Run a VIN check on any specific vehicle before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.

Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.

Look Up a VIN →

Related Make Comparisons

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.