Last updated: 2026-03-04

Mazda CX-50
67
GoodReliability score: 67 out of 100, rated Good

Mazda CX-50 Reliability by Year

The Mazda CX-50 averages 67/100 across 3 model years, rated good.

6 recalls96 complaintsBest year: 2024

Mazda CX-50 Reliability Overview

The Mazda CX-50, covering model years 2023 to 2026, has an average reliability score of 91/100, indicating an excellent reliability reputation. Data shows that while the 2023 model year experienced issues with service brakes and electrical systems, subsequent years, particularly 2024 and 2026, show significant improvement with scores of 100/100 and fewer complaints. The CX-50 is best suited for those seeking a vehicle with a strong safety record, evidenced by consistent 5/5 NHTSA safety ratings, but potential buyers should be aware of early-year issues that have been reported.

Current generation: 1st gen (2023–2024), facelifted 2025.

Best & Worst Mazda CX-50 Years

Best Mazda CX-50 Years to Buy

The best Mazda CX-50 year is 2024 with a reliability score of 71/100, rated good. Other strong picks include 2025 (66/100) and 2023 (65/100).

Mazda CX-50 Years to Avoid

No Mazda CX-50 years are statistical outliers in our data — all years score consistently.

See full Mazda CX-50 years-to-avoid analysis →

Mazda CX-50 Reliability Score Trend

Mazda CX-50 reliability has remained consistent across model years, averaging 67/100.

avg 67
23
24
25

Scores 0–100. Higher is better.

Mazda CX-50 reliability scores by year
YearScoreRating
202365/100Good
202471/100Good
202566/100Good

Year-by-Year Reliability

Mazda CX-50 Repair Costs

Reliability Rating

3/5

Compare Mazda CX-50 With Similar SUVs

The Mazda CX-50 competes with other midsize suvs such as Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4, and Hyundai Tucson.

Most Reliable Used SUVs

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Mazda CX-50 reliable?
The Mazda CX-50 has good reliability with an average score of 67/100. Some model years are stronger than others — check individual years before buying.
What is the best year for the Mazda CX-50?
The best year for the Mazda CX-50 is 2024 with a reliability score of 71/100, rated good. It has 1 recalls and 26 owner complaints on record. See full 2024 Mazda CX-50 analysis →
What are the Mazda CX-50 years to avoid?
No Mazda CX-50 years in our database are statistical outliers — all tracked model years score consistently within the model average. See full years-to-avoid analysis →
How much does it cost to maintain a Mazda CX-50?
Annual maintenance cost estimates are not available for the Mazda CX-50. Based on its reliability score and complaint patterns, check individual year pages for repair cost details when available.

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue