Last updated: 2026-03-04

0 Mazda CX-50 Years to Avoid
Years that score significantly below the Mazda CX-50 average of 67/100
All Mazda CX-50 years score consistently around the model average of 67/100 — no years are statistical outliers. The best year is 2024 71/100 and the weakest is 2023 65/100.
Verdict
All Mazda CX-50 years score consistently around the model average of 67/100 (65–71 range) — no years are statistical outliers. The best is 2024 71/100 and the weakest is 2023 65/100.
What Are Common Mazda CX-50 Problems?
Top reported issues across all Mazda CX-50 model years, based on NHTSA owner complaints.
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
11 complaintsMost reported in 2023, 2024, 2025
SERVICE BRAKES
11 complaintsMost reported in 2023, 2024
POWER TRAIN
10 complaintsMost reported in 2023, 2024, 2025
STRUCTURE
10 complaintsMost reported in 2023, 2024, 2025
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
8 complaintsMost reported in 2023, 2024
SUSPENSION
7 complaintsMost reported in 2023, 2025
Best Mazda CX-50 Year to Buy Instead
2024 Mazda CX-50
The 2024 Mazda CX-50 has good reliability. There are 1 recall and 26 owner complaints on file for the 2024 Mazda CX-50. Severity signals include 2 crash-related complaints. The most commonly reported problem areas are: Structure (4), Forward Collision Avoidance (3), Electrical System (3).
All Mazda CX-50 Years by Generation
All model years ranked by reliability score, grouped by generation.
Mazda CX-50 Reliability Scores by Year
Our data covers 2023–2025 model years.
Frequently Asked Questions
What Mazda CX-50 years should you avoid?
What is the best year for the Mazda CX-50?
How many recalls does the Mazda CX-50 have?
Is a used Mazda CX-50 worth buying?
What are common Mazda CX-50 problems?
Is the Mazda CX-50 reliable long-term?
Is the 2024 Mazda CX-50 a good used buy?
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue