Last updated: 2026-05-15
KIA EV6 vs Mazda CX-50: Reliability Compared

KIA EV6

Mazda CX-50
Choosing between the KIA EV6 and the Mazda CX-50? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two compact suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Mazda CX-50 currently leads with an average score of 67/100 compared to 57/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the KIA EV6 and Mazda CX-50 Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Mazda CX-50 is more reliable than the KIA EV6, scoring 67/100 vs 57/100.
The Mazda CX-50 demonstrates superior reliability compared to the Kia EV6, with an average reliability score of 66 out of 100 versus the EV6's 43. Despite both models having some common issues, the CX-50 has fewer recalls over four years and a lower owner complaint rate at 27.4 per 10,000 sold, compared to the EV6's 48.9. The key differentiator is the CX-50's more favorable recall history and complaint rate, making it a more reliable choice for buyers.
Key Differences
- 1Mazda CX-50 has 21.5 fewer complaints per 10k sold
- 2Mazda CX-50 scores 10 points higher in reliability
- 3Mazda CX-50 has 2 fewer total recalls
Category Scoreboard
KIA EV6 vs Mazda CX-50: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | KIA EV6 | Mazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 57/100 | 67/100 |
| Years Tracked | 5 | 4 |
| Total Recalls | 8 | 6 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 48.9 | 27.4 |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2026 NHTSA | 2026 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 1 | 2 |
What Are the Common Problems With the KIA EV6 and Mazda CX-50?
The Kia EV6 exhibits a significantly higher volume of complaints, particularly in the electrical system with 204 reports, including three crash-linked incidents, indicating a potential area of concern. In contrast, the Mazda CX-50 has fewer total complaints, with its most reported issue being service brakes and unknown or other categories, both at 11 complaints, with only one crash-linked incident in service brakes. Notably, the EV6 has a broader distribution of complaints across various critical systems such as power train and service brakes, both with crash-linked incidents, whereas the CX-50's issues are more concentrated in non-crash-linked categories like structure and steering. Both vehicles have safety-related complaints, but the EV6's higher number of crash-linked electrical and unknown issues suggests a more severe problem profile in terms of potential safety implications.
| Component | KIA EV6 | Mazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 28.4High | 2.3Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 7.8Above Avg | 2.9Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 3.3Average | 3.1Average |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 1.8Low | 3.1Average |
| STRUCTURE | 1Very Low | 2.9Low |
| STEERING | 0.3Very Low | 2Low |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 0.3Very Low | 1.7Low |
| SUSPENSION | —None | 2Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 1.3Low | —None |
| AIR BAGS | 0.4Very Low | 0.6Very Low |
| LANE DEPARTURE | 0.4Very Low | 0.6Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.6Very Low | —None |
| WHEELS | —None | 0.6Very Low |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | —None | 0.6Very Low |
| SEATS | —None | 0.6Very Low |
| TIRES | 0.4Very Low | —None |
| ENGINE | 0.4Very Low | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
How Does KIA EV6 vs Mazda CX-50 Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | KIA EV6 | Mazda CX-50 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 69/1000R / 0C | 66/1003R / 21C | KIA EV6 |
| 2024 | 59/1002R / 38C | 71/1001R / 26C | Mazda CX-50 |
| 2023 | 52/1003R / 98C | 65/1002R / 49C | Mazda CX-50 |
| 2026(predicted) | 60/100(predicted) | 67/100(predicted) | Mazda CX-50 |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 KIA EV6 scored 69/100 and the 2024 Mazda CX-50 scored 71/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the KIA EV6 vs the Mazda CX-50?
KIA EV6 vs Mazda CX-50: Common Questions
- Is the KIA EV6 more reliable than the Mazda CX-50?
- Based on our data, the Mazda CX-50 is more reliable with an average score of 67/100 compared to 57/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the KIA EV6 or the Mazda CX-50?
- The KIA EV6 has more recalls (8) compared to the Mazda CX-50 (6). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the KIA EV6 or the Mazda CX-50?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Mazda CX-50 has a lower complaint rate at 27.4 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 48.9 for the KIA EV6. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Is the KIA EV6 or Mazda CX-50 safer?
- Both the KIA EV6 and Mazda CX-50 received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More KIA EV6 comparisons
Decided between KIA EV6 and Mazda CX-50? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue