Last updated: 2026-03-04
Kia Telluride vs Mazda CX-90: Reliability Compared

Kia Telluride

Mazda CX-90
Choosing between the Kia Telluride and the Mazda CX-90? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Kia Telluride currently leads with an average score of 66/100 compared to 51/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Kia Telluride and Mazda CX-90 Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Kia Telluride is more reliable than the Mazda CX-90, scoring 66/100 vs 51/100.
The Kia Telluride demonstrates superior reliability compared to the Mazda CX-90, with an average reliability score of 71/100 versus 51/100 for the CX-90. The Telluride also has a significantly lower owner complaints rate of 23.3 per 10,000 sold compared to 111.2 for the CX-90, alongside a more established recall history with 27 recalls over six years. Additionally, the estimated annual repair cost for the Telluride is $573, providing a clearer cost expectation for potential owners. While both vehicles encounter issues with their electrical systems and engines, the Telluride's overall performance in reliability metrics makes it the more dependable choice.
Key Differences
- 1Kia Telluride has 87.9 fewer complaints per 10k sold
- 2Kia Telluride scores 15 points higher in reliability
- 3Mazda CX-90 has 14 fewer total recalls
Category Scoreboard
Kia Telluride vs Mazda CX-90: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Kia Telluride | Mazda CX-90 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 66/100 | 51/100 |
| Years Tracked | 6 | 3 |
| Total Recalls | 27 | 13 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 23.3 | 111.2 |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2025 NHTSA | 2026 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 2 | 0 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Kia Telluride and Mazda CX-90?
The Kia Telluride exhibits a higher volume of complaints, with significant issues in categories such as UNKNOWN OR OTHER, VISIBILITY/WIPER, and ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, each surpassing 190 complaints. Notably, the Telluride's SERVICE BRAKES category has 31 complaints, with 6 linked to crashes, indicating a potential safety concern. In contrast, the Mazda CX-90 has fewer overall complaints, but the STEERING category accounts for a substantial portion, with 80 complaints and 5 crash-linked incidents, suggesting a critical area of concern. While both models have crash-linked complaints in their ELECTRICAL SYSTEM and POWER TRAIN categories, the Kia Telluride's broader distribution of issues highlights a range of reliability challenges.
| Component | Kia Telluride | Mazda CX-90 |
|---|---|---|
| STEERING | 0.3Very Low | 31.8High |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 2.8Low | 17.5High |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 0.2Very Low | 11.5Above Avg |
| POWER TRAIN | 1.7Low | 8.3Above Avg |
| ENGINE | 1.9Low | 6.8Average |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | 4.2Average | 4Average |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.2Very Low | 6.4Average |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 4.4Average | 0.8Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.5Very Low | 2.8Low |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | 2.5Low | —None |
| STRUCTURE | 0.9Very Low | 1.6Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | —None | 2Low |
| VISIBILITY | 0.3Very Low | —None |
| SUSPENSION | 0.3Very Low | —None |
| AIR BAGS | 0.2Very Low | —None |
| SEAT BELTS | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| SEATS | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Kia Telluride or Mazda CX-90?
How Does Kia Telluride vs Mazda CX-90 Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Kia Telluride | Mazda CX-90 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 78/1002R / 32C | 63/1002R / 21C | Kia Telluride |
| 2024 | 69/1004R / 180C | 38/10011R / 259C | Kia Telluride |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 Kia Telluride scored 78/100 and the 2025 Mazda CX-90 scored 63/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Kia Telluride vs the Mazda CX-90?
Kia Telluride vs Mazda CX-90: Common Questions
- Is the Kia Telluride more reliable than the Mazda CX-90?
- Based on our data, the Kia Telluride is more reliable with an average score of 66/100 compared to 51/100. That's a significant difference worth considering.
- Which has more recalls, the Kia Telluride or the Mazda CX-90?
- The Kia Telluride has more recalls (27) compared to the Mazda CX-90 (13). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Kia Telluride or the Mazda CX-90?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Kia Telluride has a lower complaint rate at 23.3 per 10,000 sold versus 111.2 for the Mazda CX-90. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Is the Kia Telluride or Mazda CX-90 safer?
- Both the Kia Telluride and Mazda CX-90 received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Kia Telluride comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue