Last updated: 2026-03-04
Kia Telluride vs Nissan Pathfinder: Reliability Compared

Kia Telluride

Nissan Pathfinder
Choosing between the Kia Telluride and the Nissan Pathfinder? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Nissan Pathfinder currently leads with an average score of 73/100 compared to 66/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Kia Telluride and Nissan Pathfinder Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Nissan Pathfinder is more reliable than the Kia Telluride, scoring 73/100 vs 66/100.
The Nissan Pathfinder demonstrates superior reliability with an average score of 75/100 compared to the Kia Telluride's 71/100. The Pathfinder also has a significantly lower owner complaints rate of 3.5 per 10,000 sold, versus 23.3 for the Telluride, and fewer recalls over a longer period (14 over 8 years compared to 27 over 6 years). While both vehicles have similar estimated annual repair costs, with the Pathfinder at $542 and the Telluride at $573, the Pathfinder's lower complaint rate and recall history make it the more reliable choice.
Key Differences
- 1Nissan Pathfinder costs $31 less per year to repair
- 2Nissan Pathfinder has 19.8 fewer complaints per 10k sold
- 3Nissan Pathfinder has 13 fewer total recalls
Category Scoreboard
Kia Telluride vs Nissan Pathfinder: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Kia Telluride | Nissan Pathfinder |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 66/100 | 73/100 |
| Years Tracked | 6 | 8 |
| Total Recalls | 27 | 14 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 23.3 | 3.5 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $573/yr | $542/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.4/yr | 0.4/yr |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2025 NHTSA | 2026 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 0 (1 tied) | 4 (1 tied) |
What Are the Common Problems With the Kia Telluride and Nissan Pathfinder?
The Kia Telluride presents a higher volume of complaints, with significant issues in the visibility/wiper and electrical system categories, including three crash-linked incidents related to the latter. In contrast, the Nissan Pathfinder, while having fewer overall complaints, shows a balanced distribution of issues, with electrical system and power train problems being the most common. Notably, the Kia Telluride has a higher incidence of crash-linked complaints in the service brakes category, totaling six, compared to zero in the Pathfinder. Both models experience a similar number of complaints in the unknown or other category, but the Telluride's broader range of affected components suggests more diverse reliability challenges.
| Component | Kia Telluride | Nissan Pathfinder |
|---|---|---|
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 4.4Average | 0.5Very Low |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | 4.2Average | —None |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 2.8Low | 0.5Very Low |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | 2.5Low | —None |
| POWER TRAIN | 1.7Low | 0.5Very Low |
| ENGINE | 1.9Low | 0.3Very Low |
| STRUCTURE | 0.9Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.5Very Low | 0.4Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.3Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.2Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | 0.2Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| VISIBILITY | 0.3Very Low | —None |
| SUSPENSION | 0.3Very Low | —None |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 0.2Very Low | —None |
| SEAT BELTS | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| SEATS | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC) | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | —None | —None |
| FUEL SYSTEM | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Kia Telluride or Nissan Pathfinder?
How Does Kia Telluride vs Nissan Pathfinder Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Kia Telluride | Nissan Pathfinder | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 78/1002R / 32C | 78/1001R / 25C | Tie |
| 2024 | 69/1004R / 180C | 74/1002R / 38C | Nissan Pathfinder |
| 2023 | 68/1005R / 161C | 74/1001R / 86C | Nissan Pathfinder |
| 2022 | 63/1006R / 280C | 66/1005R / 119C | Nissan Pathfinder |
| 2020 | 55/1006R / 667C | 78/1000R / 43C | Nissan Pathfinder |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 Kia Telluride scored 78/100 and the 2025 Nissan Pathfinder scored 78/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Kia Telluride vs the Nissan Pathfinder?
Kia Telluride vs Nissan Pathfinder: Common Questions
- Is the Kia Telluride more reliable than the Nissan Pathfinder?
- Based on our data, the Nissan Pathfinder is more reliable with an average score of 73/100 compared to 66/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the Kia Telluride or the Nissan Pathfinder?
- The Kia Telluride has more recalls (27) compared to the Nissan Pathfinder (14). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Kia Telluride or the Nissan Pathfinder?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Nissan Pathfinder has a lower complaint rate at 3.5 per 10,000 sold versus 23.3 for the Kia Telluride. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the Kia Telluride or the Nissan Pathfinder?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Nissan Pathfinder is cheaper to maintain at $542/year versus $573/year for the Kia Telluride.
- Is the Kia Telluride or Nissan Pathfinder safer?
- Both the Kia Telluride and Nissan Pathfinder received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Kia Telluride comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue