Last updated: 2026-03-04

Ford Explorer vs Toyota 4RUNNER: Reliability Compared

Choosing between the Ford Explorer and the Toyota 4RUNNER? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.

Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Toyota 4RUNNER currently leads with an average score of 80/100 compared to 66/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.

How Do the Ford Explorer and Toyota 4RUNNER Generations Compare?

The Ford Explorer is currently in its sixth generation, which began in 2020. Being relatively early in its generational cycle, buyers might encounter initial teething issues typical of newer platforms. However, Ford's experience over previous generations can contribute to a more refined product. In contrast, the Toyota 4Runner is in its fifth generation, launched in 2010 and extended with a facelift in 2013. This mature platform is well-sorted, often translating to robust reliability. With the 4Runner nearing the end of its generation, prospective buyers may benefit from a vehicle where most issues have been addressed over its long production run.

Verdict

The Toyota 4RUNNER is more reliable than the Ford Explorer, scoring 80/100 vs 66/100.

The Toyota 4Runner outshines the Ford Explorer in terms of reliability, boasting a higher average reliability score of 90/100 compared to the Explorer's 68/100. With only 17 total recalls over nine years and an owner complaint rate of 1.5 per 10,000 sold, the 4Runner demonstrates superior durability, whereas the Explorer has 117 recalls and a complaint rate of 6.8 per 10,000 sold. Additionally, independent repair cost estimates favor the 4Runner with an annual cost of $514, significantly lower than the Explorer's $732. Key areas of concern for the Explorer include powertrain and electrical system issues, while the 4Runner's primary issues are with steering and brakes.

Key Differences

  1. 1Toyota 4RUNNER costs $218 less per year to repair
  2. 2Toyota 4RUNNER has 100 fewer total recalls
  3. 3Toyota 4RUNNER scores 14 points higher in reliability

Category Scoreboard

2Ford Explorer
5Toyota 4RUNNER
Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsComplaint RateAnnual Repair CostRepair FrequencyMajor Repair RiskSafety Rating

Ford Explorer vs Toyota 4RUNNER: Which Is More Reliable?

Ford Explorer vs Toyota 4RUNNER at-a-glance reliability comparison
MetricFord ExplorerToyota 4RUNNER
Reliability Score66/10080/100
Years Tracked99
Total Recalls11717
Complaints per 10k Sold6.81.5
Annual Repair Cost$732/yr$514/yr
Repair Frequency0.2/yr0.4/yr
Major Repair Risk14%13%
Safety RatingNHTSA overall
2026 NHTSA
2026 NHTSA
Frontal
Side
Rollover
Year Wins08

What Are the Common Problems With the Ford Explorer and Toyota 4RUNNER?

The Ford Explorer exhibits a higher volume of complaints, with significant issues in the power train and structure, each containing a notable number of crash-linked incidents. The Explorer's power train alone accounts for 618 complaints, with 12 linked to crashes, suggesting a critical area of concern. In contrast, the Toyota 4RUNNER demonstrates fewer overall complaints, but a notable concentration in air bags, with 24 complaints and a high crash-link rate of 20. While both vehicles face challenges in the electrical system, the Explorer's broader range of problem areas, including the service brakes and back over prevention, indicates a more diversified set of reliability concerns compared to the 4RUNNER's more focused issues.

Ford Explorer vs Toyota 4RUNNER common problem areas comparison
ComponentFord ExplorerToyota 4RUNNER
POWER TRAIN1.6LowNone
UNKNOWN OR OTHER1.1Low0.2Very Low
STRUCTURE1Very LowNone
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM0.7Very Low0.1Very Low
ENGINE0.4Very LowNone
STEERING0.2Very Low0.2Very Low
SERVICE BRAKES0.2Very Low0.2Very Low
BACK OVER PREVENTION0.2Very LowNone
SUSPENSION0.1Very Low0.1Very Low
AIR BAGS0.1Very Low0.1Very Low
SEATS0.1Very LowNone
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING0.1Very LowNone
FUEL SYSTEMNone0.1Very Low
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROLNoneNone
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCENoneNone
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEMNoneNone
VISIBILITY/WIPERNoneNone
SEAT BELTSNoneNone
TIRESNoneNone
EXTERIOR LIGHTINGNoneNone

Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.

Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Ford Explorer or Toyota 4RUNNER?

According to independent repair cost data, the Ford Explorer incurs an annual repair cost of $732, which is $218 more than the Toyota 4RUNNER's $514. Over five years, this difference amounts to $1,090. Despite the higher cost, the Explorer has a lower repair frequency, requiring service only 0.2 times per year compared to the 4RUNNER's 0.4 visits. However, the Explorer's risk of a major repair is slightly higher at 14% versus the 4RUNNER's 13%. For cost-conscious buyers, the Toyota 4RUNNER offers better value due to its lower annual repair expenses and marginally reduced risk of major repairs, despite needing more frequent servicing.

How Does Ford Explorer vs Toyota 4RUNNER Reliability Compare by Year?

Ford Explorer vs Toyota 4RUNNER year-by-year reliability scores
YearFord ExplorerToyota 4RUNNEREdge
202572/10014R / 65C81/1001R / 36CToyota 4RUNNER
202473/1006R / 14C79/1001R / 8CToyota 4RUNNER
202371/10012R / 84C82/1001R / 28CToyota 4RUNNER
202265/10021R / 208C79/1003R / 36CToyota 4RUNNER
202162/10022R / 354C82/1001R / 31CToyota 4RUNNER
202054/10029R / 1066C82/1001R / 30CToyota 4RUNNER
201969/1004R / 252C77/1004R / 61CToyota 4RUNNER
201864/1005R / 651C77/1005R / 56CToyota 4RUNNER
2026(predicted)72/100(predicted)81/100(predicted)Toyota 4RUNNER

Best years to cross-shop: The 2024 Ford Explorer scored 73/100 and the 2023 Toyota 4RUNNER scored 82/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.

Who Should Buy the Ford Explorer vs the Toyota 4RUNNER?

If you prioritize reliability and low running costs, the Toyota 4RUNNER is your ideal choice. With a reliability score of 90/100, it stands out as a dependable SUV. It has significantly fewer recalls (17) and owner complaints (1.5 per 10,000 sold) compared to the Ford Explorer. The estimated annual repair cost is also lower at $514, making it a cost-effective option for long-term ownership. Despite a slightly higher repair frequency (0.4/yr), the 4RUNNER's major repair risk is a mere 13%, suggesting fewer severe issues. On the other hand, if you are interested in a more affordable upfront purchase and can manage slightly higher maintenance concerns, the Ford Explorer could be suitable. With a reliability score of 68/100, it does present more challenges like higher recalls (117) and owner complaints (6.8 per 10,000 sold). The estimated annual repair cost is $732, but if you can handle occasional issues with the powertrain or electrical system, it might still fit your needs.

Ford Explorer vs Toyota 4RUNNER: Common Questions

Is the Ford Explorer more reliable than the Toyota 4RUNNER?
Based on our data, the Toyota 4RUNNER is more reliable with an average score of 80/100 compared to 66/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
Which has more recalls, the Ford Explorer or the Toyota 4RUNNER?
The Ford Explorer has more recalls (117) compared to the Toyota 4RUNNER (17). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
Which has fewer owner complaints, the Ford Explorer or the Toyota 4RUNNER?
Adjusted for sales volume, the Toyota 4RUNNER has a lower complaint rate at 1.5 per 10,000 sold versus 6.8 for the Ford Explorer. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Ford Explorer or the Toyota 4RUNNER?
Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Toyota 4RUNNER is cheaper to maintain at $514/year versus $732/year for the Ford Explorer.
Is the Ford Explorer or Toyota 4RUNNER safer?
Based on NHTSA crash test ratings, the Ford Explorer has a higher overall safety rating of 5/5 stars compared to 4/5 for the Toyota 4RUNNER. Check sub-ratings (frontal, side, rollover) above for a more detailed safety comparison.

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue