Last updated: 2026-03-04

Ford Mustang vs Tesla Model 3: Reliability Compared

More ReliableFord Mustang reliability comparison

Ford Mustang

65
GoodReliability score: 65 out of 100, rated Good
VS
Tesla Model 3 reliability comparison

Tesla Model 3

54
MixedReliability score: 54 out of 100, rated Mixed

Choosing between the Ford Mustang and the Tesla Model 3? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize coupes.

Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Ford Mustang currently leads with an average score of 65/100 compared to 54/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.

How Do the Ford Mustang and Tesla Model 3 Generations Compare?

The Tesla Model 3 is currently in its second generation, which began in 2024, following a significant refresh in 2023. As it is early in its generation cycle, potential first-year issues may arise as Tesla refines the new platform. In contrast, the Ford Mustang is in its seventh generation, which also started in 2024. However, the Mustang benefits from a long history of development, with its sixth-generation running from 2015 to 2023 and receiving an update in 2018. Generally, mature platforms like the Mustang's tend to have well-sorted reliability, whereas newer platforms like the Model 3’s may require some time to address initial issues.

Verdict

The Ford Mustang is more reliable than the Tesla Model 3, scoring 65/100 vs 54/100.

Analyzing reliability data reveals that the Ford Mustang outperforms the Tesla Model 3. The Mustang boasts a higher average reliability score of 68/100 compared to the Model 3's 41/100 and has fewer total recalls at 71 versus 113 over nine years. The owner complaint rate is also significantly lower for the Mustang, with just 5.7 complaints per 10,000 sold, whereas the Model 3 has 28.7. Additionally, independent repair cost estimates for the Mustang average $709 annually, providing a clearer picture of potential ownership costs that Tesla does not offer.

Key Differences

  1. 1Ford Mustang has 42 fewer total recalls
  2. 2Ford Mustang has 23.0 fewer complaints per 10k sold
  3. 3Ford Mustang scores 11 points higher in reliability

Category Scoreboard

3Ford Mustang
—
0Tesla Model 3
Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsComplaint Rate

Ford Mustang vs Tesla Model 3: Which Is More Reliable?

Ford Mustang vs Tesla Model 3 at-a-glance reliability comparison
MetricFord MustangTesla Model 3
Reliability Score65/10054/100
Years Tracked99
Total Recalls71113
Complaints per 10k Sold5.728.7
Year Wins80

What Are the Common Problems With the Ford Mustang and Tesla Model 3?

The Tesla Model 3 exhibits a higher volume of complaints overall, particularly in forward collision avoidance and vehicle speed control, with 841 and 511 complaints respectively, and a notable number of these linked to crashes (33 and 67). In contrast, the Ford Mustang's issues are more concentrated in the electrical system, with 269 complaints, though only 7 are crash-linked. Tesla's substantial issues in forward collision avoidance and vehicle speed control suggest potential safety concerns, while the Mustang's problems appear less crash-related but still significant in the power train and electrical categories. Both models face challenges with their electrical systems, but the Tesla Model 3's broader range of issues, including steering and air bags, indicates a more diverse problem profile.

Ford Mustang vs Tesla Model 3 common problem areas comparison
ComponentFord MustangTesla Model 3
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE0.3Very Low6.1Average
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM1.5Low3Low
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL0.2Very Low3.7Average
UNKNOWN OR OTHER0.3Very Low2.8Low
STEERING0.3Very Low2.6Low
SERVICE BRAKES0.3Very Low2.1Low
AIR BAGS0.1Very Low1.7Low
SUSPENSION—None1.6Low
POWER TRAIN0.9Very Low0.6Very Low
STRUCTURE0.2Very Low0.5Very Low
ENGINE0.5Very Low—None
LANE DEPARTURE—None0.3Very Low
EXTERIOR LIGHTING—None0.2Very Low
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING0.1Very Low—None
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM0.1Very Low—None
LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES0.1Very Low—None
SEAT BELTS—None0.1Very Low
WHEELS—None—None
FUEL SYSTEM—None—None
VISIBILITY/WIPER—None—None
BACK OVER PREVENTION—None—None

Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.

Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Ford Mustang or Tesla Model 3?

Based on industry estimates, the Ford Mustang incurs an annual repair cost of approximately $709, with an average of 0.2 repair visits per year and a 14% risk of a major repair. In contrast, specific repair costs for the Tesla Model 3 are not available, though electric vehicles like Tesla generally have fewer moving parts, potentially leading to lower maintenance needs. Over five years, the Ford Mustang could cost around $3,545 in repairs, assuming no significant increase in repair costs. The Mustang's higher likelihood of needing major repairs suggests it may not be the best choice for cost-conscious buyers. While Tesla's costs are less predictable, its lower repair frequency and potential long-term savings on maintenance make it a more appealing option for those seeking value in ownership costs.

How Does Ford Mustang vs Tesla Model 3 Reliability Compare by Year?

Ford Mustang vs Tesla Model 3 year-by-year reliability scores
YearFord MustangTesla Model 3Edge
202573/1003R / 8C67/1003R / 87CFord Mustang
202467/10010R / 63C62/1004R / 183CFord Mustang
202372/1006R / 14C57/10010R / 386CFord Mustang
202259/10017R / 154C50/10016R / 729CFord Mustang
202154/10018R / 373C48/10020R / 626CFord Mustang
202066/1008R / 101C54/10020R / 416CFord Mustang
201967/1004R / 129C49/10021R / 569CFord Mustang
201865/1004R / 172C46/10018R / 951CFord Mustang
2026(predicted)71/100(predicted)62/100(predicted)Ford Mustang

Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 Ford Mustang scored 73/100 and the 2025 Tesla Model 3 scored 67/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.

Who Should Buy the Ford Mustang vs the Tesla Model 3?

If you prioritize reliability and lower owner complaints, the Ford Mustang is the better option for you. With a reliability score of 68/100 compared to the Tesla Model 3's 41/100, the Mustang demonstrates a stronger track record. It also has fewer recalls and significantly lower owner complaints per 10,000 sold (5.7 vs. 28.7). Additionally, the Mustang's estimated annual repair cost is $709, with a repair frequency of 0.2 times per year, making it a more predictable choice in terms of maintenance. On the other hand, if you are drawn to the Tesla Model 3 for its innovative technology and electric vehicle benefits, be prepared for its challenges, including a high number of recalls (113) and common issues with systems like forward collision avoidance and vehicle speed control. While repair costs and frequency are not clearly outlined, potential buyers should be cautious about the major repair risk associated with these systemic issues.

Ford Mustang vs Tesla Model 3: Common Questions

Is the Ford Mustang more reliable than the Tesla Model 3?
Based on our data, the Ford Mustang is more reliable with an average score of 65/100 compared to 54/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
Which has more recalls, the Ford Mustang or the Tesla Model 3?
The Tesla Model 3 has more recalls (113) compared to the Ford Mustang (71). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
Which has fewer owner complaints, the Ford Mustang or the Tesla Model 3?
Adjusted for sales volume, the Ford Mustang has a lower complaint rate at 5.7 per 10,000 sold versus 28.7 for the Tesla Model 3. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.

Related Reliability Comparisons

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue