Last updated: 2026-07-26

Hyundai Palisade vs Mazda CX-9: Reliability Compared

Choosing between the Hyundai Palisade and the Mazda CX-9? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two full-size suvs.

Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Mazda CX-9 currently leads with an average score of 76/100 compared to 65/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.

How Do the Hyundai Palisade and Mazda CX-9 Generations Compare?

As of 2026, the Hyundai Palisade is in its second generation, which began in 2024. It received a facelift in 2023, indicating that it's still relatively early in its current generation cycle. Newer platforms like the Palisade's second generation often experience first-year issues as any production kinks are ironed out. In contrast, the Mazda CX-9 is late in its second generation, which started in 2016 and continued through 2024 without further redesigns. Mature platforms like the CX-9's tend to be well-sorted, offering refined reliability as initial issues have typically been addressed over the years.

Verdict

The Mazda CX-9 is more reliable than the Hyundai Palisade, scoring 76/100 vs 65/100.

The Mazda CX-9 outshines the Hyundai Palisade in terms of reliability, boasting a higher average reliability score of 76/100 compared to the Palisade's 65/100. With only 6 recalls over six years and a lower complaint rate of 15 per 10,000 sold, the CX-9 demonstrates greater dependability than the Palisade, which has 33 recalls and a complaint rate of 31.7 per 10,000 sold. Additionally, the CX-9 incurs slightly lower annual repair costs at $539, as opposed to the Palisade's $573. These factors, combined with fewer common issues, make the Mazda CX-9 the more reliable choice in this comparison.

Key Differences

  1. 1Mazda CX-9 costs $34 less per year to repair
  2. 2Mazda CX-9 has 27 fewer total recalls
  3. 3Mazda CX-9 has 16.7 fewer complaints per 10k sold

Category Scoreboard

1Hyundai Palisade
4Mazda CX-9
Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsComplaint RateAnnual Repair CostRepair Frequency

Hyundai Palisade vs Mazda CX-9: Which Is More Reliable?

Hyundai Palisade vs Mazda CX-9 at-a-glance reliability comparison
MetricHyundai PalisadeMazda CX-9
Reliability Score65/10076/100
Years Tracked76
Total Recalls336
Complaints per 10k Sold31.715
Annual Repair Cost$573/yr$539/yr
Repair Frequency0.4/yr0.6/yr
Year Wins04

What Are the Common Problems With the Hyundai Palisade and Mazda CX-9?

The Hyundai Palisade exhibits a higher volume of complaints across several categories compared to the Mazda CX-9, with significant issues noted in service brakes, seat belts, and visibility/wiper systems. Notably, the Palisade's service brakes have 16 crash-linked complaints, suggesting a potential safety concern. In contrast, the Mazda CX-9's primary issue lies with the engine, accounting for 95 complaints, but it has fewer overall safety-related incidents. Both models have some crash-linked complaints in the "unknown or other" category, but the Palisade's broader distribution of issues, particularly in safety-critical components, indicates a more diverse problem profile.

Hyundai Palisade vs Mazda CX-9 common problem areas comparison
ComponentHyundai PalisadeMazda CX-9
ENGINE1.7Low5.7Average
SERVICE BRAKES5.4Average0.7Very Low
UNKNOWN OR OTHER3.3Average2Low
SEAT BELTS3.9AverageNone
VISIBILITY/WIPER3.6Average0.1Very Low
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM2.1Low1.5Low
POWER TRAIN1.6Low1.2Low
SUSPENSION2.3Low0.2Very Low
STEERING1.1Low0.4Very Low
STRUCTURE0.4Very Low0.3Very Low
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL0.4Very LowNone
AIR BAGS0.2Very Low0.2Very Low
VISIBILITY0.2Very LowNone
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING0.1Very Low0.1Very Low
BACK OVER PREVENTIONNone0.2Very Low
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE0.1Very LowNone
Chest ClipNone0.1Very Low
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEMNone0.1Very Low
FUEL SYSTEMNone0.1Very Low
SEATSNoneNone

Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.

Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Hyundai Palisade or Mazda CX-9?

Based on industry estimates, the Hyundai Palisade has an annual repair cost of $573, slightly higher than the Mazda CX-9's $539. Over five years, this difference amounts to $170. However, the Palisade requires fewer repair visits, with an average of 0.4 visits per year compared to the CX-9's 0.6 visits. Additionally, the CX-9 carries a 10% risk of major repairs, a factor not applicable to the Palisade. For cost-conscious buyers, the Palisade offers better value due to its lower repair frequency and absence of major repair risk, despite its marginally higher annual repair cost.

How Does Hyundai Palisade vs Mazda CX-9 Reliability Compare by Year?

Hyundai Palisade vs Mazda CX-9 year-by-year reliability scores
YearHyundai PalisadeMazda CX-9Edge
202362/1005R / 326C81/1000R / 12CMazda CX-9
202265/1005R / 241C81/1000R / 9CMazda CX-9
202161/1006R / 354C77/1001R / 35CMazda CX-9
202059/1007R / 521C78/1001R / 19CMazda CX-9

Best years to cross-shop: The 2022 Hyundai Palisade scored 65/100 and the 2023 Mazda CX-9 scored 81/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.

Who Should Buy the Hyundai Palisade vs the Mazda CX-9?

If you prioritize reliability and fewer recalls, the Mazda CX-9 is a strong contender. With a reliability score of 76/100 and only six recalls, it offers a more dependable experience. The owner complaints per 10,000 sold are significantly lower at 15, reducing the likelihood of encountering issues. Although the repair frequency is slightly higher at 0.6 times per year, the estimated annual repair cost is affordable at $539. This model suits those who value long-term reliability and minimal disruptions. On the other hand, if you are budget-conscious and can manage occasional maintenance, the Hyundai Palisade might be appealing. Despite its lower reliability score of 65/100 and higher owner complaints at 31.7 per 10,000 sold, it has a slightly lower repair frequency of 0.4 times per year and an annual repair cost of $573. This vehicle is suitable for those who don't mind addressing minor issues in exchange for potential savings on repair frequency.

Hyundai Palisade vs Mazda CX-9: Common Questions

Is the Hyundai Palisade more reliable than the Mazda CX-9?
Based on our data, the Mazda CX-9 is more reliable with an average score of 76/100 compared to 65/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
Which has more recalls, the Hyundai Palisade or the Mazda CX-9?
The Hyundai Palisade has more recalls (33) compared to the Mazda CX-9 (6). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
Which has fewer owner complaints, the Hyundai Palisade or the Mazda CX-9?
Adjusted for sales volume, the Mazda CX-9 has a lower complaint rate at 15 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 31.7 for the Hyundai Palisade. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Hyundai Palisade or the Mazda CX-9?
Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Mazda CX-9 is cheaper to maintain at $539/year versus $573/year for the Hyundai Palisade.

Decided between Hyundai Palisade and Mazda CX-9? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.

Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.

Look Up a VIN →

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue