Last updated: 2026-07-26
Chevrolet Traverse vs Mazda CX-9: Reliability Compared

Chevrolet Traverse

Mazda CX-9
Choosing between the Chevrolet Traverse and the Mazda CX-9? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Mazda CX-9 currently leads with an average score of 76/100 compared to 70/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Chevrolet Traverse and Mazda CX-9 Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Mazda CX-9 is more reliable than the Chevrolet Traverse, scoring 76/100 vs 70/100.
The Mazda CX-9 demonstrates superior reliability compared to the Chevrolet Traverse with a higher average reliability score of 76/100 versus 70/100. It also has a significantly lower recall count, with just 6 recalls over 6 years compared to the Traverse's 19 over 9 years. While the CX-9 has more owner complaints per 10,000 vehicles sold, its estimated annual repair cost is notably lower at $539, compared to the Traverse's $656. The key differentiator is the CX-9's more favorable recall history and lower repair costs, making it a more reliable choice overall.
Key Differences
- 1Mazda CX-9 costs $117 less per year to repair
- 2Mazda CX-9 has 13 fewer total recalls
- 3Mazda CX-9 has 8% lower major repair risk
Category Scoreboard
Chevrolet Traverse vs Mazda CX-9: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Chevrolet Traverse | Mazda CX-9 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 70/100 | 76/100 |
| Years Tracked | 9 | 6 |
| Total Recalls | 19 | 6 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 7.2 | 15 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $656/yr | $539/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.4/yr | 0.6/yr |
| Major Repair Risk | 18% | 10% |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2026 NHTSA | 2023 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 0 | 6 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Chevrolet Traverse and Mazda CX-9?
The Chevrolet Traverse exhibits a higher volume of complaints, particularly in the power train and electrical system, with 431 and 222 complaints respectively, and a notable number of crash-linked incidents in these areas. In contrast, the Mazda CX-9 has significantly fewer total complaints, with the engine category being the most prevalent at 95 complaints but without any crash-linked issues. Both models report issues with service brakes, but the Traverse has a higher severity with seven crash-linked complaints compared to the CX-9's two. Additionally, the Traverse shows more diversity in problem areas, whereas the CX-9's complaints are more concentrated in fewer categories.
| Component | Chevrolet Traverse | Mazda CX-9 |
|---|---|---|
| ENGINE | 0.6Very Low | 5.7Average |
| POWER TRAIN | 2.2Low | 1.2Low |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 1.1Low | 1.5Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 0.6Very Low | 2Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.7Very Low | 0.7Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.2Very Low | 0.4Very Low |
| STRUCTURE | 0.1Very Low | 0.3Very Low |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING | 0.2Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| SUSPENSION | 0.1Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | 0.1Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| SEAT BELTS | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| Chest Clip | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| FUEL SYSTEM | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | —None | —None |
| SEATS | —None | —None |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | —None | —None |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Chevrolet Traverse or Mazda CX-9?
How Does Chevrolet Traverse vs Mazda CX-9 Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Chevrolet Traverse | Mazda CX-9 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 72/1002R / 62C | 81/1000R / 12C | Mazda CX-9 |
| 2022 | 73/1001R / 76C | 81/1000R / 9C | Mazda CX-9 |
| 2021 | 71/1003R / 72C | 77/1001R / 35C | Mazda CX-9 |
| 2020 | 62/1008R / 188C | 78/1001R / 19C | Mazda CX-9 |
| 2019 | 62/1003R / 358C | 73/1002R / 52C | Mazda CX-9 |
| 2018 | 62/1002R / 416C | 66/1002R / 125C | Mazda CX-9 |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2022 Chevrolet Traverse scored 73/100 and the 2023 Mazda CX-9 scored 81/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Chevrolet Traverse vs the Mazda CX-9?
Chevrolet Traverse vs Mazda CX-9: Common Questions
- Is the Chevrolet Traverse more reliable than the Mazda CX-9?
- Based on our data, the Mazda CX-9 is more reliable with an average score of 76/100 compared to 70/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the Chevrolet Traverse or the Mazda CX-9?
- The Chevrolet Traverse has more recalls (19) compared to the Mazda CX-9 (6). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Chevrolet Traverse or the Mazda CX-9?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Chevrolet Traverse has a lower complaint rate at 7.2 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 15 for the Mazda CX-9. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the Chevrolet Traverse or the Mazda CX-9?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Mazda CX-9 is cheaper to maintain at $539/year versus $656/year for the Chevrolet Traverse.
- Is the Chevrolet Traverse or Mazda CX-9 safer?
- Both the Chevrolet Traverse and Mazda CX-9 received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Chevrolet Traverse comparisons
Decided between Chevrolet Traverse and Mazda CX-9? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue