Last updated: 2026-05-15
Ram Promaster vs Toyota Tundra: Reliability Compared
Ram Promaster
Toyota Tundra
Choosing between the Ram Promaster and the Toyota Tundra? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two full-size trucks.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Toyota Tundra currently leads with an average score of 68/100 compared to 62/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Ram Promaster and Toyota Tundra Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Toyota Tundra is more reliable than the Ram Promaster, scoring 68/100 vs 62/100.
The Toyota Tundra and Ram Promaster both present distinct reliability profiles, with the Tundra achieving a slightly higher average reliability score of 68/100 compared to the Promaster's 62/100. However, the Tundra has a higher owner complaint rate at 11.9 per 10,000 sold, as opposed to the Promaster's lower 4.6, which indicates fewer issues relative to its sales volume. Despite the Tundra's higher repair cost estimate of $606 annually, it also has a more extensive recall history with 90 recalls over nine years compared to the Promaster's 54. Overall, the Tundra offers slightly better reliability scores, but the Promaster benefits from fewer complaints and recalls, making it a potentially more dependable choice for buyers prioritizing reduced maintenance concerns.
Key Differences
- 1Ram Promaster has 36 fewer total recalls
- 2Ram Promaster has 7.3 fewer complaints per 10k sold
- 3Toyota Tundra scores 6 points higher in reliability
Category Scoreboard
Ram Promaster vs Toyota Tundra: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Ram Promaster | Toyota Tundra |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Years Tracked | 9 | 9 |
| Total Recalls | 54 | 90 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 4.6 | 11.9 |
| Year Wins | 2 | 6 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Ram Promaster and Toyota Tundra?
The Toyota Tundra exhibits a higher volume of complaints, particularly in the power train and engine categories, with notable crash-linked incidents in both areas. Its electrical system and service brakes also present significant concerns, each with multiple crash-linked complaints. In contrast, the Ram Promaster has fewer overall complaints, with the electrical system and steering being the most reported issues, but it does not show a specific concentration in crash-linked problems. While both vehicles have issues with their power trains, the Tundra's additional challenges in engine reliability and safety-related complaints suggest a more severe problem profile.
| Component | Ram Promaster | Toyota Tundra |
|---|---|---|
| POWER TRAIN | 0.5Very Low | 2.3Low |
| ENGINE | 0.2Very Low | 2Low |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 0.6Very Low | 1.1Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 0.5Very Low | 0.9Very Low |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING | 0.4Very Low | 0.7Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.3Very Low | 0.7Very Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | —None | 0.9Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.5Very Low | 0.3Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.1Very Low | 0.7Very Low |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 0.1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| FUEL SYSTEM | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| LANE DEPARTURE | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| SEAT BELTS | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| STRUCTURE | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| AIR BAGS | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| SEATS | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC) | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| EQUIPMENT | —None | —None |
| SUSPENSION | —None | —None |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | —None | —None |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Ram Promaster or Toyota Tundra?
How Does Ram Promaster vs Toyota Tundra Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Ram Promaster | Toyota Tundra | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 62/1004R / 3C | 73/1006R / 88C | Toyota Tundra |
| 2024 | 62/1006R / 5C | 65/10014R / 235C | Toyota Tundra |
| 2023 | 63/1007R / 39C | 59/10022R / 321C | Ram Promaster |
| 2022 | 61/1008R / 53C | 57/10021R / 386C | Ram Promaster |
| 2021 | 58/10011R / 98C | 75/1003R / 23C | Toyota Tundra |
| 2020 | 62/1007R / 34C | 74/1005R / 42C | Toyota Tundra |
| 2019 | 58/10010R / 60C | 70/10010R / 69C | Toyota Tundra |
| 2018 | 68/1000R / 1C | 69/1009R / 94C | Toyota Tundra |
| 2026(predicted) | 62/100(predicted) | 66/100(predicted) | Toyota Tundra |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2018 Ram Promaster scored 68/100 and the 2021 Toyota Tundra scored 75/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Ram Promaster vs the Toyota Tundra?
Ram Promaster vs Toyota Tundra: Common Questions
- Is the Ram Promaster more reliable than the Toyota Tundra?
- Based on our data, the Toyota Tundra is more reliable with an average score of 68/100 compared to 62/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the Ram Promaster or the Toyota Tundra?
- The Toyota Tundra has more recalls (90) compared to the Ram Promaster (54). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Ram Promaster or the Toyota Tundra?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Ram Promaster has a lower complaint rate at 4.6 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 11.9 for the Toyota Tundra. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Ram Promaster comparisons
Decided between Ram Promaster and Toyota Tundra? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue