- Home
- Compare Makes
- Mitsubishi vs Toyota
Last updated: 2026-07-26
Mitsubishi vs Toyota: Reliability Compared

Mitsubishi
1 models tracked

Toyota
19 models tracked
Comparing Mitsubishi and Toyota on reliability? This page compares their scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs across every model we track.
Both makes currently share an average reliability score of 76/100. Scroll down for the full breakdown.
Is Mitsubishi More Reliable Than Toyota?
| Metric | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Reliability Score | 76/100 | 76/100 |
| Models Tracked | 1 | 19 |
| Avg Recalls per Model | 24 | 25 |
| Avg Complaints per Model | 398 | 616 |
| Avg Annual Repair Cost | $519/yr | $482/yr |
Mitsubishi vs Toyota: The Verdict
There's no meaningful reliability gap between Mitsubishi and Toyota. We scored 20 models between the two makes: Mitsubishi at 76/100 and Toyota at 76/100, based on recalls, complaint severity, repair costs, and issue diversity.
On the cost front, Toyota is cheaper to maintain at $482/year versus $519/year. For buyers watching long-term costs, Toyota's lower maintenance bill is a real differentiator.
Where Mitsubishi and Toyota Differ Most
Our reliability score is built from four weighted components. Here's how each make performs in each area:
| Component | Weight | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complaint Severity Owner complaints weighted by component severity | 35% | 66/100Good | 67/100Good |
| Repair Costs Annual maintenance and repair expenses | 30% | 80/100Excellent | 77/100Good |
| Recall Impact Safety recalls weighted by severity (park-it, park-outside) | 20% | 80/100Excellent | 80/100Excellent |
| Issue Diversity How many different systems have reported problems | 15% | 83/100Excellent | 82/100Excellent |
Mitsubishi vs Toyota: Strengths and Weaknesses
Mitsubishi
Strengths
- Strong overall reliability (76/100 average)
- Minimal recall impact — fewer safety-critical recalls
- Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
- Reasonable maintenance costs ($519/year avg)
- Reliability trending upward in recent model years
- Below-average repair frequency
Weaknesses
- Above-average repair severity when issues occur
Toyota
Strengths
- Strong overall reliability (76/100 average)
- Minimal recall impact — fewer safety-critical recalls
- Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
- Very affordable maintenance ($482/year avg)
- Reliability trending upward in recent model years
- 19 of 19 models rated Good or Excellent
- Below-average repair frequency
Weaknesses
- 93 fire-related complaints across lineup
- Above-average repair severity when issues occur
Which Make Is Cheaper to Maintain: Mitsubishi or Toyota?
Based on independent repair cost data, Toyota is cheaper to maintain at an average of $482/year compared to $519/year for Mitsubishi. The difference is relatively small, so maintenance costs shouldn't be a major deciding factor between these makes.
Toyota Repair Cost Range
$362 – $642/yr
Average: $482/yr
Mitsubishi vs Toyota Reliability by Vehicle Type
How the two makes compare within each vehicle category they both compete in:
| Category | Mitsubishi | Toyota | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUVs(1 vs 9 models) | 76/100 | 77/100 | Toyota |
Toyota wins 1 out of 1 shared categories.
Common Problems: Mitsubishi vs Toyota
Top complaint categories from NHTSA owner reports, showing what drivers report most frequently for each make:
| Component | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| POWER TRAIN | 6%18 | 19%1,909 |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 12%39 | 14%1,400 |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 20%63 | 13%1,271 |
| ENGINE | 2%8 | 10%984 |
| AIR BAGS | 10%32 | 9%914 |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 5%15 | 8%803 |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 2%8 | 8%765 |
| STEERING | 5%16 | 6%565 |
| STRUCTURE | 24%78 | 4%359 |
| SUSPENSION | 4%14 | 1%64 |
Percentage of total complaints. Raw complaint count shown below. Based on NHTSA owner reports across all tracked model years.
Mitsubishi vs Toyota Complaint Severity: Crashes, Fires, and Injuries
Across all tracked models, Mitsubishi owners reported 33 crash-related, 1 fire-related, and 32 injury-related complaints to NHTSA. Toyota owners reported 694 crash-related, 93 fire-related, and 627 injury-related complaints. Mitsubishi has fewer severe incident reports overall. These counts reflect owner-reported incidents and don't establish causation — but they're a useful signal for comparing safety profiles.
Mitsubishi
33
Crash reports
1
Fire reports
32
Injury reports
Toyota
694
Crash reports
93
Fire reports
627
Injury reports
Every Mitsubishi and Toyota Model Ranked
All tracked models ranked by average reliability score. Click any model for detailed year-by-year data.
Mitsubishi Models
Toyota Models
Mitsubishi vs Toyota Reliability Trend by Year
Average reliability score for each model year, showing how quality has trended over time:
Mitsubishi's reliability is improving — recent model years average 81/100, up from earlier years. Toyota's reliability is improving — recent model years average 82/100.
Interestingly, both Mitsubishi and Toyota show improving reliability trends recently.
| Model Year | Mitsubishi | Toyota | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | — | 86/100 | — |
| 2025 | 82/100(1) | 78/100(15) | Mitsubishi |
| 2024 | 79/100(1) | 75/100(16) | Mitsubishi |
| 2023 | 77/100(1) | 75/100(15) | Mitsubishi |
| 2022 | 62/100(1) | 76/100(16) | Toyota |
| 2021 | 84/100(1) | 76/100(14) | Mitsubishi |
| 2020 | 76/100(1) | 73/100(13) | Mitsubishi |
| 2019 | 74/100(1) | 70/100(12) | Mitsubishi |
| 2018 | 71/100(1) | 71/100(12) | Tie |
Number in parentheses = models tracked for that year. Scores are averages across all tracked models.
The Bottom Line: Mitsubishi or Toyota?
Since neither make has a meaningful reliability edge, focus on finding the right model in your budget and body style.
If you want the single most reliable option: the Toyota Crown leads both lineups with a score of 85/100.
Budget-conscious buyers should note that Toyota costs less to maintain — $482/year vs $519/year.
All scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data combined with independent repair cost databases. Check individual model pages for year-specific reliability data before making a final decision.
Mitsubishi vs Toyota: Common Questions
Is Mitsubishi more reliable than Toyota?
Which is cheaper to maintain, Mitsubishi or Toyota?
Which make has more recalls, Mitsubishi or Toyota?
What are the most reliable models from Mitsubishi and Toyota?
What are the most common problems with Mitsubishi and Toyota vehicles?
How many Mitsubishi and Toyota models does Auto Reliability Index track?
Which make has fewer owner complaints, Mitsubishi or Toyota?
Are Mitsubishi and Toyota getting more or less reliable?
Which is better for a first-time car buyer, Mitsubishi or Toyota?
Which make has fewer safety-related complaints, Mitsubishi or Toyota?
Comparing Mitsubishi vs Toyota? Run a VIN check on any specific vehicle before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
Related Make Comparisons
More Mitsubishi comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.