Last updated: 2026-03-28
Audi E-Tron-GT vs Mercedes-Benz EQS: Reliability Compared

Audi E-Tron-GT

Mercedes-Benz EQS
Choosing between the Audi E-Tron-GT and the Mercedes-Benz EQS? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize sedans.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Audi E-Tron-GT currently leads with an average score of 68/100 compared to 52/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
Verdict
The Audi E-Tron-GT is more reliable than the Mercedes-Benz EQS, scoring 68/100 vs 52/100.
Key Differences
- 1Audi E-Tron-GT has 58.6 fewer complaints per 10k sold
- 2Mercedes-Benz EQS has 20 fewer total recalls
- 3Audi E-Tron-GT scores 16 points higher in reliability
Category Scoreboard
Audi E-Tron-GT vs Mercedes-Benz EQS: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Audi E-Tron-GT | Mercedes-Benz EQS |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 68/100 | 52/100 |
| Years Tracked | 4 | 3 |
| Total Recalls | 46 | 26 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 5.2 | 63.8 |
| Year Wins | 3 | 0 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Audi E-Tron-GT and Mercedes-Benz EQS?
| Component | Audi E-Tron-GT | Mercedes-Benz EQS |
|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 2Low | 13.7Above Avg |
| SERVICE BRAKES | —None | 13.1Above Avg |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | —None | 10.8Above Avg |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | —None | 6.8Average |
| STRUCTURE | —None | 5.1Average |
| POWER TRAIN | 1.2Low | 1.7Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | —None | 2.8Low |
| WHEELS | —None | 1.7Low |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
How Does Audi E-Tron-GT vs Mercedes-Benz EQS Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Audi E-Tron-GT | Mercedes-Benz EQS | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 67/10010R / 1C | 61/1004R / 6C | Audi E-Tron-GT |
| 2023 | 65/10015R / 10C | 52/1008R / 61C | Audi E-Tron-GT |
| 2022 | 64/10020R / 10C | 44/10014R / 45C | Audi E-Tron-GT |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2024 Audi E-Tron-GT scored 67/100 and the 2024 Mercedes-Benz EQS scored 61/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Audi E-Tron-GT vs Mercedes-Benz EQS: Common Questions
- Is the Audi E-Tron-GT more reliable than the Mercedes-Benz EQS?
- Based on our data, the Audi E-Tron-GT is more reliable with an average score of 68/100 compared to 52/100. That's a significant difference worth considering.
- Which has more recalls, the Audi E-Tron-GT or the Mercedes-Benz EQS?
- The Audi E-Tron-GT has more recalls (46) compared to the Mercedes-Benz EQS (26). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Audi E-Tron-GT or the Mercedes-Benz EQS?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Audi E-Tron-GT has a lower complaint rate at 5.2 per 10,000 sold versus 63.8 for the Mercedes-Benz EQS. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Audi E-Tron-GT comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue