Last updated: 2026-05-15
Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Mazda CX-50: Reliability Compared

Hyundai Ioniq 5

Mazda CX-50
Choosing between the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and the Mazda CX-50? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two compact suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Mazda CX-50 currently leads with an average score of 67/100 compared to 52/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Mazda CX-50 Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Mazda CX-50 is more reliable than the Hyundai Ioniq 5, scoring 67/100 vs 52/100.
The Mazda CX-50 demonstrates higher reliability with an average score of 66 out of 100 compared to the Hyundai Ioniq 5's 44. It also has a significantly lower owner complaint rate of 27.4 per 10,000 sold versus the Ioniq 5's 63.4, and fewer recalls, with only 6 over four years compared to the Ioniq 5's 18 over five years. While both vehicles have some issues with their power train and electrical systems, the Ioniq 5's more frequent recalls and higher complaint rate make the CX-50 the more reliable choice.
Key Differences
- 1Mazda CX-50 has 36.0 fewer complaints per 10k sold
- 2Mazda CX-50 scores 15 points higher in reliability
- 3Mazda CX-50 has 12 fewer total recalls
Category Scoreboard
Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Mazda CX-50: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Hyundai Ioniq 5 | Mazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 52/100 | 67/100 |
| Years Tracked | 5 | 4 |
| Total Recalls | 18 | 6 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 63.4 | 27.4 |
| Year Wins | 0 | 3 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Mazda CX-50?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 exhibits a significantly higher number of complaints, particularly in the electrical system, with 554 complaints, including 5 linked to crashes, indicating a major area of concern. In contrast, the Mazda CX-50 has a more balanced distribution of issues, with the highest number of complaints in service brakes and unknown or other categories, each receiving 11 complaints. While the Ioniq 5 also has notable issues in the power train and forward collision avoidance systems, the Mazda CX-50 shows fewer problems overall, with only 96 total complaints. Despite both models having crash-linked complaints in forward collision avoidance, the Ioniq 5's higher volume across multiple categories suggests more widespread reliability concerns.
| Component | Hyundai Ioniq 5 | Mazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 36.8High | 2.3Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 12.1Above Avg | 2.9Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 2.9Low | 3.1Average |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 1.2Low | 3.1Average |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 1.4Low | 1.7Low |
| STEERING | 0.9Very Low | 2Low |
| STRUCTURE | —None | 2.9Low |
| SUSPENSION | —None | 2Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 1.5Low | —None |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 1.3Low | —None |
| LANE DEPARTURE | 0.4Very Low | 0.6Very Low |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | 0.3Very Low | 0.6Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | —None | 0.6Very Low |
| WHEELS | —None | 0.6Very Low |
| SEATS | —None | 0.6Very Low |
| ENGINE | 0.4Very Low | —None |
| TIRES | 0.4Very Low | —None |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | 0.3Very Low | —None |
| PARKING BRAKE | 0.1Very Low | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
How Does Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Mazda CX-50 Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Hyundai Ioniq 5 | Mazda CX-50 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 53/1008R / 158C | 66/1003R / 21C | Mazda CX-50 |
| 2024 | 58/1002R / 134C | 71/1001R / 26C | Mazda CX-50 |
| 2023 | 50/1003R / 311C | 65/1002R / 49C | Mazda CX-50 |
| 2026(predicted) | 54/100(predicted) | 67/100(predicted) | Mazda CX-50 |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2024 Hyundai Ioniq 5 scored 58/100 and the 2024 Mazda CX-50 scored 71/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs the Mazda CX-50?
Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Mazda CX-50: Common Questions
- Is the Hyundai Ioniq 5 more reliable than the Mazda CX-50?
- Based on our data, the Mazda CX-50 is more reliable with an average score of 67/100 compared to 52/100. That's a significant difference worth considering.
- Which has more recalls, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 or the Mazda CX-50?
- The Hyundai Ioniq 5 has more recalls (18) compared to the Mazda CX-50 (6). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 or the Mazda CX-50?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Mazda CX-50 has a lower complaint rate at 27.4 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 63.4 for the Hyundai Ioniq 5. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Hyundai Ioniq 5 comparisons
Decided between Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Mazda CX-50? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue