Last updated: 2026-03-14
Chrysler Pacifica vs Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN: Reliability Compared

Chrysler Pacifica

Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN
Choosing between the Chrysler Pacifica and the Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize minivans.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Chrysler Pacifica currently leads with an average score of 63/100 compared to 58/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Chrysler Pacifica and Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Chrysler Pacifica is more reliable than the Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN, scoring 63/100 vs 58/100.
The Chrysler Pacifica surpasses the Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN in reliability, with a higher average reliability score of 63/100 compared to 58/100 for the Metris. Despite having more recalls, the Pacifica's owner complaints rate is significantly higher at 27 per 10,000 units versus the Metris's minimal 0.5 per 10,000, indicating more prevalent issues for owners. The Pacifica's estimated annual repair cost is available at $647, providing a clearer picture of potential maintenance expenses, whereas the Metris lacks this data. Both vehicles have distinct common issues, but the Pacifica's broader range of problems across power train, electrical, and engine systems may concern potential buyers.
Key Differences
- 1Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN has 35 fewer total recalls
- 2Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN has 26.5 fewer complaints per 10k sold
- 3Chrysler Pacifica scores 5 points higher in reliability
Category Scoreboard
Chrysler Pacifica vs Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Chrysler Pacifica | Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 63/100 | 58/100 |
| Years Tracked | 9 | 5 |
| Total Recalls | 67 | 32 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 27 | 0.5 |
| Year Wins | 4 | 1 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Chrysler Pacifica and Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN?
The Chrysler Pacifica exhibits significant issues in its power train and electrical system, with both categories showing over 500 complaints each and a notable number of crash-linked incidents, particularly in the power train with 11 crashes. Additionally, the Pacifica's steering and service brakes are areas of concern, each associated with multiple crash-linked complaints. In contrast, the Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN has a much lower total complaint volume, with the most significant issues being in the fuel system and wheels, but no crash-linked complaints reported. Overall, the Pacifica presents a broader range of severe reliability issues, particularly in safety-critical systems, compared to the Metris-Passenger-VAN.
| Component | Chrysler Pacifica | Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN |
|---|---|---|
| POWER TRAIN | 6.5Average | —None |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 6.4Average | —None |
| ENGINE | 3.5Average | —None |
| STEERING | 2.5Low | —None |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 1.2Low | —None |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.9Very Low | —None |
| HYBRID PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.6Very Low | —None |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.5Very Low | —None |
| AIR BAGS | 0.5Very Low | —None |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.4Very Low | —None |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | 0.3Very Low | —None |
| SUSPENSION | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| STRUCTURE | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| FUEL SYSTEM | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| WHEELS | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| TIRES | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| SEATS | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Chrysler Pacifica or Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN?
How Does Chrysler Pacifica vs Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Chrysler Pacifica | Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 65/1008R / 148C | 70/1000R / 0C | Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN |
| 2022 | 62/1006R / 284C | 57/1005R / 9C | Chrysler Pacifica |
| 2021 | 57/1006R / 355C | 55/1007R / 1C | Chrysler Pacifica |
| 2020 | 64/1005R / 201C | 54/1008R / 7C | Chrysler Pacifica |
| 2019 | 60/1009R / 352C | 52/10012R / 8C | Chrysler Pacifica |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2023 Chrysler Pacifica scored 65/100 and the 2023 Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN scored 70/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Chrysler Pacifica vs the Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN?
Chrysler Pacifica vs Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN: Common Questions
- Is the Chrysler Pacifica more reliable than the Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN?
- Based on our data, the Chrysler Pacifica is more reliable with an average score of 63/100 compared to 58/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the Chrysler Pacifica or the Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN?
- The Chrysler Pacifica has more recalls (67) compared to the Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN (32). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Chrysler Pacifica or the Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN has a lower complaint rate at 0.5 per 10,000 sold versus 27 for the Chrysler Pacifica. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Chrysler Pacifica comparisons
More Mercedes-Benz Metris-Passenger-VAN comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue