Last updated: 2026-07-17
Cadillac XT5 vs Volvo XC90: Reliability Compared

Cadillac XT5

Volvo XC90
Choosing between the Cadillac XT5 and the Volvo XC90? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Cadillac XT5 currently leads with an average score of 75/100 compared to 72/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Cadillac XT5 and Volvo XC90 Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Cadillac XT5 is more reliable than the Volvo XC90, scoring 75/100 vs 72/100.
The Cadillac XT5 slightly outperforms the Volvo XC90 in reliability, boasting a higher average reliability score of 74 compared to the XC90's 72. Both vehicles share an identical owner complaint rate of 4.2 per 10,000 sold, but the XT5 has a significantly lower total recall count of 16 over eight years, compared to the XC90's 39 over nine years. Additionally, the XT5 offers a marginally lower estimated annual repair cost at $807, against the XC90's $851. These factors collectively suggest that the XT5 is the more reliable choice, particularly in terms of recall history and maintenance expenses.
Key Differences
- 1Cadillac XT5 costs $44 less per year to repair
- 2Cadillac XT5 has 23 fewer total recalls
- 3Cadillac XT5 scores 3 points higher in reliability
Category Scoreboard
Cadillac XT5 vs Volvo XC90: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Cadillac XT5 | Volvo XC90 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 75/100 | 72/100 |
| Years Tracked | 8 | 9 |
| Total Recalls | 16 | 39 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $807/yr | $851/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.6/yr | 0.6/yr |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2026 NHTSA | 2026 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 5 (2 tied) | 1 (2 tied) |
What Are the Common Problems With the Cadillac XT5 and Volvo XC90?
The Volvo XC90 exhibits a higher frequency of complaints related to the electrical system, with 58 issues reported, including one linked to a crash. In contrast, the Cadillac XT5's most significant concern lies in the steering system, accounting for 26 complaints. Both vehicles have notable problems with the power train and service brakes, but the XC90's service brakes are more problematic with three crash-linked incidents compared to the XT5's one. While both models show issues with their electrical systems, the XC90 has a broader range of concerns, including back over prevention and visibility/wiper systems, which have also resulted in crash-linked complaints.
| Component | Cadillac XT5 | Volvo XC90 |
|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 0.4Very Low | 1.1Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 0.4Very Low | 0.5Very Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 0.6Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.7Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.2Very Low | 0.4Very Low |
| ENGINE | 0.3Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | 0.1Very Low | 0.3Very Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| STRUCTURE | 0.1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | 0.1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| AIR BAGS | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| VISIBILITY | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| WHEELS | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES | —None | 0.1Very Low |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Cadillac XT5 or Volvo XC90?
How Does Cadillac XT5 vs Volvo XC90 Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Cadillac XT5 | Volvo XC90 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 81/1000R / 0C | 73/1002R / 2C | Cadillac XT5 |
| 2025 | 74/1001R / 2C | 74/1003R / 23C | Tie |
| 2024 | 72/1003R / 10C | 73/1003R / 26C | Volvo XC90 |
| 2023 | 72/1004R / 13C | 70/1006R / 39C | Cadillac XT5 |
| 2021 | 73/1003R / 24C | 72/1005R / 17C | Cadillac XT5 |
| 2020 | 71/1005R / 19C | 71/1007R / 24C | Tie |
| 2019 | 78/1000R / 31C | 71/1006R / 31C | Cadillac XT5 |
| 2018 | 77/1000R / 63C | 71/1003R / 40C | Cadillac XT5 |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2026 Cadillac XT5 scored 81/100 and the 2025 Volvo XC90 scored 74/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Cadillac XT5 vs the Volvo XC90?
Cadillac XT5 vs Volvo XC90: Common Questions
- Is the Cadillac XT5 more reliable than the Volvo XC90?
- Based on our data, the Cadillac XT5 is more reliable with an average score of 75/100 compared to 72/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the Cadillac XT5 or the Volvo XC90?
- The Volvo XC90 has more recalls (39) compared to the Cadillac XT5 (16). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Cadillac XT5 or the Volvo XC90?
- Both models log a similar rate of 4.2 complaints per 10,000 vehicles sold. Check individual year pages for component-level breakdowns.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the Cadillac XT5 or the Volvo XC90?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Cadillac XT5 is cheaper to maintain at $807/year versus $851/year for the Volvo XC90.
- Is the Cadillac XT5 or Volvo XC90 safer?
- Both the Cadillac XT5 and Volvo XC90 received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Cadillac XT5 comparisons
Decided between Cadillac XT5 and Volvo XC90? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue