Last updated: 2026-07-26

Buick Envision vs Mazda CX-5: Reliability Compared

Choosing between the Buick Envision and the Mazda CX-5? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.

Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Mazda CX-5 currently leads with an average score of 83/100 compared to 77/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.

How Do the Buick Envision and Mazda CX-5 Generations Compare?

As of 2026, the Mazda CX-5 is in its third generation (KI), introduced in 2025. This model is early in its generation cycle, which can sometimes mean first-year issues as manufacturers work out initial production quirks. In contrast, the Buick Envision is in its second generation, which started in 2021 and received a refresh in 2024. As the Envision is later in its generation cycle, it benefits from a more mature platform that is generally well-sorted, potentially leading to better reliability. The CX-5 had a significant facelift in 2022 during its second generation, indicating ongoing refinement efforts.

Verdict

The Mazda CX-5 is more reliable than the Buick Envision, scoring 83/100 vs 77/100.

The Mazda CX-5 outperforms the Buick Envision in terms of reliability with an average score of 83/100 compared to the Envision's 77/100. Although the Envision has a lower recall count with 6 compared to the CX-5's 11, the CX-5 has a slightly higher owner complaint rate of 5.6 per 10,000 sold versus the Envision's 4.9. The CX-5 also benefits from a lower estimated annual repair cost of $447, compared to $573 for the Envision. Overall, the Mazda CX-5 offers a more reliable ownership experience, particularly with its lower repair expenses.

Key Differences

  1. 1Mazda CX-5 costs $126 less per year to repair
  2. 2Mazda CX-5 scores 6 points higher in reliability
  3. 3Buick Envision has 5 fewer total recalls

Category Scoreboard

2Buick Envision
3Mazda CX-5
Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsComplaint RateAnnual Repair CostRepair FrequencySafety Rating

Buick Envision vs Mazda CX-5: Which Is More Reliable?

Buick Envision vs Mazda CX-5 at-a-glance reliability comparison
MetricBuick EnvisionMazda CX-5
Reliability Score77/10083/100
Years Tracked99
Total Recalls611
Complaints per 10k Sold4.95.6
Annual Repair Cost$573/yr$447/yr
Repair Frequency0.4/yr0.3/yr
Safety RatingNHTSA overall
2026 NHTSA
2026 NHTSA
Frontal
Side
Rollover
Year Wins2 (1 tied)6 (1 tied)

What Are the Common Problems With the Buick Envision and Mazda CX-5?

The Mazda CX-5 exhibits a higher number of overall complaints at 986 compared to the Buick Envision's 131, with significant issues in the engine and electrical systems, each having over 100 complaints. Notably, the CX-5's electrical system has 7 crash-linked complaints, while its vehicle speed control and air bags each account for 11 crash-linked complaints, indicating potentially severe safety concerns. In contrast, the Buick Envision's most reported issue is the electrical system with 23 complaints, but it has fewer crash-linked incidents overall, with the air bags category having the highest at 3. The CX-5 shows a broader distribution of problems across various components, with a particular emphasis on safety-related complaints, whereas the Envision's issues are fewer and less frequently crash-linked.

Buick Envision vs Mazda CX-5 common problem areas comparison
ComponentBuick EnvisionMazda CX-5
ENGINE0.4Very Low1.5Low
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM0.9Very Low0.7Very Low
POWER TRAIN0.6Very Low0.6Very Low
UNKNOWN OR OTHER0.4Very Low0.6Very Low
SERVICE BRAKES0.5Very Low0.3Very Low
AIR BAGS0.3Very Low0.2Very Low
STEERING0.3Very Low0.1Very Low
TIRES0.2Very LowNone
SUSPENSION0.2Very LowNone
FUEL SYSTEM0.1Very Low0.1Very Low
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROLNone0.2Very Low
STRUCTURENone0.2Very Low
LANE DEPARTURE0.1Very LowNone
BACK OVER PREVENTION0.1Very LowNone
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM0.1Very LowNone
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCENone0.1Very Low
EXTERIOR LIGHTINGNone0.1Very Low
VISIBILITY/WIPERNone0.1Very Low
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLINGNoneNone
SEATSNoneNone

Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.

Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Buick Envision or Mazda CX-5?

According to industry estimates, the Mazda CX-5 offers a more budget-friendly ownership experience, with an annual repair cost of $447 compared to the Buick Envision's $573. This $126 difference per year equates to $630 over five years. The CX-5 also boasts a lower repair frequency of 0.3 visits annually versus the Envision’s 0.4, indicating fewer trips to the mechanic. Additionally, the CX-5 has a major repair risk of 8%, while specific data for the Envision is unavailable, potentially signaling higher costs in unforeseen repairs. For cost-conscious buyers, the Mazda CX-5 emerges as the more economical choice.

How Does Buick Envision vs Mazda CX-5 Reliability Compare by Year?

Buick Envision vs Mazda CX-5 year-by-year reliability scores
YearBuick EnvisionMazda CX-5Edge
202677/1001R / 0C94/1000R / 0CMazda CX-5
202582/1000R / 7C82/1003R / 25CTie
202476/1001R / 10C84/1001R / 53CMazda CX-5
202376/1001R / 22C81/1002R / 96CMazda CX-5
202275/1001R / 23C87/1000R / 50CMazda CX-5
202174/1002R / 23C83/1000R / 129CMazda CX-5
202078/1000R / 10C86/1000R / 94CMazda CX-5
201978/1000R / 23C75/1002R / 229CBuick Envision
201878/1000R / 13C71/1003R / 310CBuick Envision

Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 Buick Envision scored 82/100 and the 2026 Mazda CX-5 scored 94/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.

Who Should Buy the Buick Envision vs the Mazda CX-5?

If you prioritize low running costs and reliability, the Mazda CX-5 is likely your best choice. With a higher reliability score of 83 out of 100, it offers a more dependable experience compared to the Buick Envision. The CX-5 also boasts a lower estimated annual repair cost of $447 and a lower repair frequency of 0.3 times per year. Although it has had more recalls (11), the overall lower major repair risk of 8% makes it a solid option for those looking for long-term reliability. On the other hand, if your concern is minimizing owner complaints and you prefer a vehicle with fewer recalls, the Buick Envision might suit you better. It has fewer owner complaints per 10,000 sold at 4.9 and only 6 recalls. However, be prepared for a higher estimated annual repair cost of $573 and a slightly higher repair frequency of 0.4 times per year. Choose the Envision if you value a quieter ownership experience, even if it might mean spending a bit more on maintenance.

Buick Envision vs Mazda CX-5: Common Questions

Is the Buick Envision more reliable than the Mazda CX-5?
Based on our data, the Mazda CX-5 is more reliable with an average score of 83/100 compared to 77/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
Which has more recalls, the Buick Envision or the Mazda CX-5?
The Mazda CX-5 has more recalls (11) compared to the Buick Envision (6). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
Which has fewer owner complaints, the Buick Envision or the Mazda CX-5?
Adjusted for sales volume, the Buick Envision has a lower complaint rate at 4.9 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 5.6 for the Mazda CX-5. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Buick Envision or the Mazda CX-5?
Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Mazda CX-5 is cheaper to maintain at $447/year versus $573/year for the Buick Envision.
Is the Buick Envision or Mazda CX-5 safer?
Both the Buick Envision and Mazda CX-5 received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.

Decided between Buick Envision and Mazda CX-5? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.

Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.

Look Up a VIN →

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue