Last updated: 2026-10-10
Buick Envision vs Mazda CX-5: Reliability Compared

Buick Envision

Mazda CX-5
Reliability favors the Mazda CX-5 over the Buick Envision, thanks to cheaper upkeep and fewer shop visits. Cracked cylinder heads are the CX-5's costly flaw. The Envision has fewer recalls and a slightly lower complaint rate per car sold, but it costs more to keep running and ranks a step lower.
How Do the Buick Envision and Mazda CX-5 Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Mazda CX-5 is more reliable than the Buick Envision, scoring 83/100 vs 77/100.
Reliability favors the CX-5, and the edge is clear. Its standing is excellent against good for the Envision, its yearly repair cost is lower, and it makes fewer unscheduled shop visits. The catch is severity. When a CX-5 engine fails, a cracked cylinder head repair can be quoted at $8,000. The Envision has fewer recalls and a slightly lower complaint rate per car sold, but those points do not outweigh its higher running costs and more frequent shop visits.
Key Differences
- 1Mazda CX-5 costs $126 less per year to repair
- 2Mazda CX-5 scores 6 points higher in reliability
- 3Buick Envision has 5 fewer total recalls
Category Scoreboard
Buick Envision vs Mazda CX-5: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Buick Envision | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 77/100 | 83/100 |
| Years Tracked | 9 | 9 |
| Total Recalls | 6 | 11 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 4.9 | 5.6 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $573/yr | $447/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.4/yr | 0.3/yr |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2026 NHTSA | 2026 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 2 (1 tied) | 6 (1 tied) |
What Are the Common Problems With the Buick Envision and Mazda CX-5?
Cracked cylinder heads define the CX-5. They leak oil onto the hot exhaust side, often with a burning smell, white smoke, and no warning light until oil runs low. Ghost-touch screen inputs and smart brake radar faults add to the list. The Envision's complaints are fewer and more scattered: brakes that apply hard on their own, a Service Brake Assist warning followed by a sinking pedal, steering lockup tied to engine stop/start, and oil loss near the first oil change. The CX-5 has crash-linked complaints in all five listed areas, including 9 in service brakes. For the Envision, only power train lists a crash-linked count.
| Component | Buick Envision | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| ENGINE | 0.4Very Low | 1.5Low |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 0.9Very Low | 0.7Very Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 0.6Very Low | 0.6Very Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 0.4Very Low | 0.7Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.5Very Low | 0.3Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | 0.3Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.3Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| TIRES | 0.2Very Low | —None |
| SUSPENSION | 0.2Very Low | —None |
| FUEL SYSTEM | 0.1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| STRUCTURE | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| LANE DEPARTURE | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| SEATS | —None | —None |
| VISIBILITY | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Buick Envision or Mazda CX-5?
How Does Buick Envision vs Mazda CX-5 Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Buick Envision | Mazda CX-5 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 77/1001R / 0C | 94/1000R / 0C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2025 | 82/1000R / 7C | 82/1003R / 25C | Tie |
| 2024 | 76/1001R / 10C | 84/1001R / 53C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2023 | 76/1001R / 22C | 81/1002R / 96C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2022 | 75/1001R / 23C | 87/1000R / 50C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2021 | 74/1002R / 23C | 83/1000R / 129C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2020 | 78/1000R / 10C | 86/1000R / 94C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2019 | 78/1000R / 23C | 75/1002R / 229C | Buick Envision |
| 2018 | 78/1000R / 13C | 71/1003R / 310C | Buick Envision |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2020 Buick Envision scored 78/100 and the 2022 Mazda CX-5 scored 87/100 — the strongest shared model years that have been on the road for at least two years, where available.
Who Should Buy the Buick Envision vs the Mazda CX-5?
Buick Envision vs Mazda CX-5: Common Questions
- Is the Mazda CX-5 more reliable than the Buick Envision?
- Yes, the CX-5 has a clear edge. It holds an excellent standing against good for the Envision, costs less to repair each year, and visits the shop less often. Its main risk is cracked cylinder heads, which are expensive when they fail.
- Which has more recalls, the CX-5 or the Envision?
- The CX-5 has more, with 11 recalls across 9 model years against 6 for the Envision. Its raw complaint count is also higher, 986 against 131, but it has sold in larger volume. Per 10,000 sold, the gap is small: 5.6 versus 4.9.
- Which is cheaper to repair, the CX-5 or the Envision?
- The CX-5 is cheaper. Independent repair-cost data estimates $447 a year for it and $573 for the Envision, which is about $630 over five years. The CX-5 also averages 0.3 unscheduled shop visits a year against 0.4.
- What is the biggest problem with the Mazda CX-5?
- Cracked cylinder heads. They leak oil onto the hot exhaust side, which causes a burning smell, white smoke, or oil on the ground, often with no warning light. Failures cluster between about 30,000 and 80,000 miles, and repair quotes reach $8,000. Some owners call it a fire risk.
- Does the Buick Envision have brake problems?
- Yes. Owners report brakes that apply hard on their own with no obstacle, and a Service Brake Assist warning followed by a very firm or sinking pedal. One diagnosed case was a failed brake vacuum pump. Dealers often cannot find a fault unless the warning stays on.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Buick Envision comparisons
Decided between Buick Envision and Mazda CX-5? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
How we score the Buick Envision and Mazda CX-5
Scores weight complaint severity at 35%, repair costs at 30%, recall impact at 20%, and the spread of complaints across systems at 15%, with complaint counts adjusted for US sales. Read the full methodology.
See incorrect data? Report an issue