Last updated: 2026-03-04
Ford Explorer vs Subaru Outback: Reliability Compared

Ford Explorer

Subaru Outback
Choosing between the Ford Explorer and the Subaru Outback? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Subaru Outback currently leads with an average score of 71/100 compared to 66/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Ford Explorer and Subaru Outback Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Subaru Outback is more reliable than the Ford Explorer, scoring 71/100 vs 66/100.
The Subaru Outback demonstrates a stronger reliability profile with an average score of 74/100 compared to the Ford Explorer's 68/100. Although the Outback has a higher complaint rate of 26.1 per 10,000 sold versus the Explorer's 6.8, it benefits from significantly fewer recalls, with only 22 compared to the Explorer's 117 over nine years. The Outback also offers lower estimated annual repair costs at $607, making it a more cost-effective choice for maintenance. While both vehicles face issues with their power trains and electrical systems, the Explorer's broader range of common problems may impact long-term reliability.
Key Differences
- 1Subaru Outback costs $125 less per year to repair
- 2Subaru Outback has 95 fewer total recalls
- 3Ford Explorer has 19.3 fewer complaints per 10k sold
Category Scoreboard
Ford Explorer vs Subaru Outback: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Ford Explorer | Subaru Outback |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 66/100 | 71/100 |
| Years Tracked | 9 | 9 |
| Total Recalls | 117 | 22 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 6.8 | 26.1 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $732/yr | $607/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.2/yr | 0.4/yr |
| Major Repair Risk | 14% | 12% |
| Year Wins | 1 (1 tied) | 6 (1 tied) |
What Are the Common Problems With the Ford Explorer and Subaru Outback?
The Ford Explorer and Subaru Outback exhibit distinct problem profiles based on aggregated complaint data. The Ford Explorer's most significant issues are with the power train, which has 618 total complaints and 12 linked to crashes, suggesting a critical area of concern. In contrast, the Subaru Outback predominantly faces problems with visibility/wiper systems, totaling 1,142 complaints, albeit with minimal crash linkage. Notably, the Subaru Outback also has a higher number of electrical system complaints at 984, compared to the Ford Explorer's 261, indicating a potential area of relative vulnerability in electronic components.
| Component | Ford Explorer | Subaru Outback |
|---|---|---|
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | —None | 8.3Above Avg |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 0.7Very Low | 7.2Above Avg |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 1.1Low | 3.4Average |
| POWER TRAIN | 1.6Low | 0.7Very Low |
| STRUCTURE | 1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.2Very Low | 0.7Very Low |
| ENGINE | 0.4Very Low | 0.4Very Low |
| VISIBILITY | —None | 0.7Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | 0.1Very Low | 0.5Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.2Very Low | 0.3Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | —None | 0.4Very Low |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | —None | 0.3Very Low |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | 0.2Very Low | —None |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| SUSPENSION | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| SEATS | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| FUEL SYSTEM | —None | —None |
| LANE DEPARTURE | —None | —None |
| LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Ford Explorer or Subaru Outback?
How Does Ford Explorer vs Subaru Outback Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Ford Explorer | Subaru Outback | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 72/10014R / 65C | 82/1000R / 43C | Subaru Outback |
| 2024 | 73/1006R / 14C | 82/1000R / 69C | Subaru Outback |
| 2023 | 71/10012R / 84C | 77/1002R / 83C | Subaru Outback |
| 2022 | 65/10021R / 208C | 67/1004R / 435C | Subaru Outback |
| 2021 | 62/10022R / 354C | 69/1004R / 283C | Subaru Outback |
| 2020 | 54/10029R / 1066C | 60/1006R / 884C | Subaru Outback |
| 2019 | 69/1004R / 252C | 63/1003R / 1017C | Ford Explorer |
| 2018 | 64/1005R / 651C | 64/1003R / 779C | Tie |
| 2026(predicted) | 72/100(predicted) | 80/100(predicted) | Subaru Outback |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2024 Ford Explorer scored 73/100 and the 2025 Subaru Outback scored 82/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Ford Explorer vs the Subaru Outback?
Ford Explorer vs Subaru Outback: Common Questions
- Is the Ford Explorer more reliable than the Subaru Outback?
- Based on our data, the Subaru Outback is more reliable with an average score of 71/100 compared to 66/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the Ford Explorer or the Subaru Outback?
- The Ford Explorer has more recalls (117) compared to the Subaru Outback (22). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Ford Explorer or the Subaru Outback?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Ford Explorer has a lower complaint rate at 6.8 per 10,000 sold versus 26.1 for the Subaru Outback. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the Ford Explorer or the Subaru Outback?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Subaru Outback is cheaper to maintain at $607/year versus $732/year for the Ford Explorer.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Ford Explorer comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue