Last updated: 2026-03-14

Audi Q5 vs Chrysler Pacifica: Reliability Compared

Choosing between the Audi Q5 and the Chrysler Pacifica? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.

Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Audi Q5 currently leads with an average score of 69/100 compared to 63/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.

Verdict

The Audi Q5 is more reliable than the Chrysler Pacifica, scoring 69/100 vs 63/100.

Key Differences

  1. 1Chrysler Pacifica costs $281 less per year to repair
  2. 2Audi Q5 has 18 fewer total recalls
  3. 3Audi Q5 has 16.6 fewer complaints per 10k sold

Category Scoreboard

3Audi Q5
2Chrysler Pacifica
Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsComplaint RateAnnual Repair CostRepair Frequency

Audi Q5 vs Chrysler Pacifica: Which Is More Reliable?

Audi Q5 vs Chrysler Pacifica at-a-glance reliability comparison
MetricAudi Q5Chrysler Pacifica
Reliability Score69/10063/100
Years Tracked99
Total Recalls4967
Complaints per 10k Sold10.427
Annual Repair Cost$928/yr$647/yr
Repair Frequency1.2/yr0.4/yr
Year Wins7 (1 tied)0 (1 tied)

What Are the Common Problems With the Audi Q5 and Chrysler Pacifica?

Audi Q5 vs Chrysler Pacifica common problem areas comparison
ComponentAudi Q5Chrysler Pacifica
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM2.4Low6.4Average
POWER TRAIN0.6Very Low6.5Average
ENGINE0.7Very Low3.5Average
STEERING0.4Very Low2.5Low
UNKNOWN OR OTHER0.4Very Low1.2Low
SERVICE BRAKES0.4Very Low0.9Very Low
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL0.3Very Low0.5Very Low
AIR BAGS0.2Very Low0.5Very Low
SUSPENSION0.5Very Low0.1Very Low
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE0.5Very Low0.1Very Low
HYBRID PROPULSION SYSTEMNone0.6Very Low
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEMNone0.4Very Low
BACK OVER PREVENTIONNone0.3Very Low
SEAT BELTS0.2Very LowNone
LANE DEPARTURE0.1Very LowNone
STRUCTURENone0.1Very Low
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLINGNone0.1Very Low
EXTERIOR LIGHTINGNoneNone
FUEL SYSTEMNoneNone
WHEELSNoneNone
VISIBILITYNoneNone
SEATSNoneNone

Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.

How Does Audi Q5 vs Chrysler Pacifica Reliability Compare by Year?

Audi Q5 vs Chrysler Pacifica year-by-year reliability scores
YearAudi Q5Chrysler PacificaEdge
202576/1000R / 15C71/1008R / 13CAudi Q5
202470/1005R / 26C70/1007R / 52CTie
202371/1002R / 6C65/1008R / 148CAudi Q5
202268/1008R / 39C62/1006R / 284CAudi Q5
202166/10016R / 126C57/1006R / 355CAudi Q5
202069/1006R / 22C64/1005R / 201CAudi Q5
201969/1005R / 40C60/1009R / 352CAudi Q5
201860/1007R / 197C51/10018R / 980CAudi Q5
2026(predicted)72/100(predicted)69/100(predicted)Audi Q5

Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 Audi Q5 scored 76/100 and the 2025 Chrysler Pacifica scored 71/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.

Audi Q5 vs Chrysler Pacifica: Common Questions

Is the Audi Q5 more reliable than the Chrysler Pacifica?
Based on our data, the Audi Q5 is more reliable with an average score of 69/100 compared to 63/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
Which has more recalls, the Audi Q5 or the Chrysler Pacifica?
The Chrysler Pacifica has more recalls (67) compared to the Audi Q5 (49). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
Which has fewer owner complaints, the Audi Q5 or the Chrysler Pacifica?
Adjusted for sales volume, the Audi Q5 has a lower complaint rate at 10.4 per 10,000 sold versus 27 for the Chrysler Pacifica. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Audi Q5 or the Chrysler Pacifica?
Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Chrysler Pacifica is cheaper to maintain at $647/year versus $928/year for the Audi Q5.

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue