Last updated: 2026-10-10
Mazda CX-50 vs Subaru Forester: Reliability Compared

Mazda CX-50

Subaru Forester
Reliability favors the Subaru Forester slightly over the Mazda CX-50, mainly because its owner complaint rate is much lower. Windshield cracking and start/stop stalls are the Forester's weak spots. The CX-50 has a short record and a higher complaint rate.
How Do the Mazda CX-50 and Subaru Forester Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Subaru Forester is more reliable than the Mazda CX-50, scoring 74/100 vs 70/100.
Reliability favors the Forester, but only slightly. Its owner complaint rate is much lower than the CX-50's, and it has a long record across nine model years. Its recurring problems, mainly cracked windshields and stalls from auto start/stop, are annoying and sometimes serious. The CX-50 has far fewer complaints in total, yet more per vehicle sold, and its record covers only four model years. That short history keeps the gap narrow.
Key Differences
- 1Subaru Forester has 18.7 fewer complaints per 10k sold
- 2Mazda CX-50 has 7 fewer total recalls
- 3Subaru Forester scores 4 points higher in reliability
Category Scoreboard
Mazda CX-50 vs Subaru Forester: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Mazda CX-50 | Subaru Forester |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 70/100 | 74/100 |
| Years Tracked | 4 | 9 |
| Total Recalls | 6 | 13 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 27.4 | 8.7 |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2026 NHTSA | 2026 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 0 | 4 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Mazda CX-50 and Subaru Forester?
Windshields dominate the Forester's complaints. Glass cracks with no impact, sometimes while parked, and a cracked windshield can disable EyeSight. Its second theme is stalling: auto start/stop fails to restart the engine at stops, and one car shut down at 70 MPH. The CX-50's complaints are more varied. Reports include false automatic emergency braking, front ball joints pulling out of control arms, and repeated dead batteries that lock owners out. Both models have crash-linked reports in electrical complaints. The Forester also has crash-linked engine reports, while the CX-50 has single crash-linked reports in brakes and suspension.
| Component | Mazda CX-50 | Subaru Forester |
|---|---|---|
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | 0.6Very Low | 3.1Average |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 2.3Low | 1.2Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 2.9Low | 0.4Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 3.1Average | 0.1Very Low |
| STRUCTURE | 2.9Low | 0.1Very Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 1.4Low | 1.2Low |
| STEERING | 2Low | 0.1Very Low |
| SUSPENSION | 2Low | —None |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 1.7Low | 0.1Very Low |
| SEATS | 1.1Low | —None |
| AIR BAGS | 0.6Very Low | 0.5Very Low |
| LANE DEPARTURE | 0.6Very Low | —None |
| WHEELS | 0.6Very Low | —None |
| VISIBILITY | —None | 0.5Very Low |
| ENGINE | —None | 0.4Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | —None | 0.1Very Low |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
How Does Mazda CX-50 vs Subaru Forester Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Mazda CX-50 | Subaru Forester | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 76/1000R / 0C | 77/1001R / 0C | Subaru Forester |
| 2025 | 66/1003R / 21C | 79/1002R / 48C | Subaru Forester |
| 2024 | 71/1001R / 26C | 78/1002R / 26C | Subaru Forester |
| 2023 | 65/1002R / 49C | 79/1001R / 61C | Subaru Forester |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2024 Mazda CX-50 scored 71/100 and the 2023 Subaru Forester scored 79/100 — the strongest shared model years that have been on the road for at least two years, where available.
Who Should Buy the Mazda CX-50 vs the Subaru Forester?
Mazda CX-50 vs Subaru Forester: Common Questions
- Is the Subaru Forester more reliable than the Mazda CX-50?
- Slightly, yes. The Forester has a lower rate of owner complaints per vehicle sold, at 8.7 per 10,000 against 27.4 for the CX-50. It also has a much longer record. The CX-50 has been sold only since 2023, so its data is thinner and the gap stays small.
- Which has more recalls, the Forester or the CX-50?
- The Forester has more in total, with 13 recalls across 9 model years. The CX-50 has 6 across 4 model years. The Forester has simply been on the road longer, so a raw count favors the newer car more than it should.
- What is the most common Forester problem?
- Cracked windshields. Owners report glass cracking with no impact, sometimes while parked and within the first few thousand miles. Cracks can spread within hours, and a cracked windshield can knock out the EyeSight system. Replacement is quoted at over $1000, and warranty help is often slow or denied.
- What goes wrong most on the Mazda CX-50?
- Brake, structure, and power train complaints lead, with suspension and electrical close behind. The most common single report is false automatic emergency braking, where the car brakes hard with nothing ahead. Front ball joint and control arm failures are the most serious suspension reports.
- Which Forester years should I avoid?
- Avoid 2018 and 2019, the weakest years in the data. The 2023 model ranks among the strongest. The 2025 model also ranks well, but it is new and has had less time to collect complaints, so it is not proven.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Mazda CX-50 comparisons
Decided between Mazda CX-50 and Subaru Forester? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
How we score the Mazda CX-50 and Subaru Forester
Scores weight complaint severity at 35%, repair costs at 30%, recall impact at 20%, and the spread of complaints across systems at 15%, with complaint counts adjusted for US sales. Read the full methodology.
See incorrect data? Report an issue