Last updated: 2026-03-04
Honda CR-V vs Subaru Forester: Reliability Compared

Honda CR-V

Subaru Forester
Choosing between the Honda CR-V and the Subaru Forester? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two compact suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. Both models currently share an average reliability score of 74/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Honda CR-V and Subaru Forester Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Honda CR-V and Subaru Forester are evenly matched with a reliability score of 74/100.
The Honda CR-V outshines the Subaru Forester in terms of reliability, boasting a higher average reliability score of 89/100 compared to the Forester's 77/100. Despite having more recalls, the CR-V maintains a lower estimated annual repair cost at $407 versus the Forester's $632. Both vehicles report similar owner complaints per 10,000 sold, with the CR-V at 8 and the Forester at 8.7, but the CR-V's more favorable repair cost and higher reliability score make it the more reliable choice. Key issues for the CR-V center around steering and collision avoidance, while the Forester faces challenges with visibility and air bags.
Key Differences
- 1Honda CR-V costs $225 less per year to repair
- 2Subaru Forester has 33 fewer total recalls
- 3Honda CR-V has 4% lower major repair risk
Category Scoreboard
Honda CR-V vs Subaru Forester: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Honda CR-V | Subaru Forester |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 74/100 | 74/100 |
| Years Tracked | 9 | 9 |
| Total Recalls | 46 | 13 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 8 | 8.7 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $407/yr | $632/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.3/yr | 0.4/yr |
| Major Repair Risk | 9% | 13% |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2026 NHTSA | 2026 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 4 | 4 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Honda CR-V and Subaru Forester?
The Honda CR-V exhibits a higher volume of complaints, particularly in the steering and forward collision avoidance systems, with notable crash-linked incidents in these categories. In contrast, the Subaru Forester faces significant issues related to visibility/wiper systems, accounting for a substantial portion of its complaints, although these are not linked to crashes. Both vehicles have electrical system complaints, but the CR-V has a broader distribution of problems across different categories, including a significant number of steering-related crashes. The Forester's vehicle speed control category is concerning due to the high proportion of crash-linked complaints, indicating a critical safety issue.
| Component | Honda CR-V | Subaru Forester |
|---|---|---|
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | 0.1Very Low | 3.1Average |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 0.9Very Low | 1.2Low |
| STEERING | 1.8Low | 0.2Very Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 0.3Very Low | 1.2Low |
| ENGINE | 0.8Very Low | 0.4Very Low |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | 0.2Very Low | 0.5Very Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 0.2Very Low | 0.4Very Low |
| FUEL SYSTEM | 0.6Very Low | —None |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.4Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.2Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.3Very Low | —None |
| VISIBILITY | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| LANE DEPARTURE | —None | —None |
| ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC) | —None | —None |
| STRUCTURE | —None | —None |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | —None | —None |
| SUSPENSION | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Honda CR-V or Subaru Forester?
How Does Honda CR-V vs Subaru Forester Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Honda CR-V | Subaru Forester | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 80/1006R / 201C | 79/1002R / 48C | Honda CR-V |
| 2024 | 77/1004R / 406C | 78/1002R / 26C | Subaru Forester |
| 2023 | 72/1007R / 578C | 79/1001R / 61C | Subaru Forester |
| 2022 | 76/1005R / 242C | 77/1001R / 86C | Subaru Forester |
| 2021 | 77/1003R / 241C | 76/1000R / 196C | Honda CR-V |
| 2020 | 74/10010R / 358C | 71/1000R / 584C | Honda CR-V |
| 2019 | 69/1007R / 996C | 63/1003R / 825C | Honda CR-V |
| 2018 | 65/1004R / 1960C | 66/1003R / 475C | Subaru Forester |
| 2026(predicted) | 76/100(predicted) | 79/100(predicted) | Subaru Forester |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 Honda CR-V scored 80/100 and the 2025 Subaru Forester scored 79/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Honda CR-V vs the Subaru Forester?
Honda CR-V vs Subaru Forester: Common Questions
- Is the Honda CR-V more reliable than the Subaru Forester?
- They're very close — both average 74/100 in our reliability scoring. Other factors like repair costs and specific year models may tip the decision.
- Which has more recalls, the Honda CR-V or the Subaru Forester?
- The Honda CR-V has more recalls (46) compared to the Subaru Forester (13). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Honda CR-V or the Subaru Forester?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Honda CR-V has a lower complaint rate at 8 per 10,000 sold versus 8.7 for the Subaru Forester. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the Honda CR-V or the Subaru Forester?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Honda CR-V is cheaper to maintain at $407/year versus $632/year for the Subaru Forester.
- Is the Honda CR-V or Subaru Forester safer?
- Both the Honda CR-V and Subaru Forester received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Honda CR-V comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue