Last updated: 2026-10-10

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Murano: Reliability Compared

The Mazda CX-5 edges out the Nissan Murano on reliability, but only slightly. Lower repair costs decide it. The CX-5 also needs fewer shop visits, though cracked cylinder heads are a real risk, while the Murano has far fewer owner complaints on file.

How Do the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan Murano Generations Compare?

Most used CX-5s come from the second generation, which covered US model years 2017 through 2025 and received a facelift for 2022. The third generation arrived for 2026 and covers only that year so far. It has had little time to collect complaints, so its clean record says little. On the Murano side, the third generation ran from 2015 through 2024 and got minor updates in 2020, so nearly every used example you will see comes from it. The fourth generation began with 2025, and that first year is listed among the Murano's weakest.

Verdict

The Mazda CX-5 is more reliable than the Nissan Murano, scoring 83/100 vs 79/100.

Slightly more reliable, the CX-5 takes this comparison with an excellent standing against good for the Murano. Independent repair-cost data decides it: lower yearly cost, fewer unscheduled shop visits, and a smaller chance that a repair is major. The lead stays narrow because of the CX-5's cracked cylinder heads, which can bring a repair quote of $8,000. The Murano's problems are fewer and more scattered, but they include brake and drivetrain faults, so neither car is risk free.

Key Differences

  1. 1Mazda CX-5 costs $60 less per year to repair
  2. 2Nissan Murano has 6 fewer total recalls
  3. 3Mazda CX-5 has 6% lower major repair risk

Category Scoreboard

4Mazda CX-5
—
1Nissan Murano
Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsAnnual Repair CostRepair FrequencyMajor Repair RiskSafety Rating

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Murano: Which Is More Reliable?

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Murano at-a-glance reliability comparison
MetricMazda CX-5Nissan Murano
Reliability Score83/10079/100
Years Tracked98
Total Recalls115
Total ComplaintsRaw count — varies with sales volume986134
Annual Repair Cost$447/yr$507/yr
Repair Frequency0.3/yr0.5/yr
Major Repair Risk8%14%
Safety RatingNHTSA overall
2026 NHTSA
2026 NHTSA
Frontal
Side
Rollover
Year Wins53

What Are the Common Problems With the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan Murano?

Mechanical failure is the CX-5's worst pattern. Cylinder heads crack and leak oil onto the hot exhaust side, often with no warning light until oil runs low. It also has the "ghost touch" screen fault and smart brake and radar malfunctions, including a car that surged forward into traffic. Its electrical, engine, power train, brake, and structure areas all carry crash links. The Murano's complaints are fewer and spread out: a forward collision warning that keeps shutting itself off, a brake pedal sinking to the floor, lurching after shifting into Drive, and a passenger airbag that switches off. Air bags are a crash-linked area only the Murano has.

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Murano common problem areas comparison
ComponentMazda CX-5Nissan Murano
ENGINE263—
UNKNOWN OR OTHER12324
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM1238
POWER TRAIN986
SERVICE BRAKES549
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL334
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE1421
STRUCTURE33—
AIR BAGS275
VISIBILITY/WIPER194
FUEL SYSTEM19—
EXTERIOR LIGHTING134
STEERING124
SUSPENSION62
TIRES5—
SEATS4—
VISIBILITY3—
SEAT BELTS—2
EQUIPMENT—2
LANE DEPARTURE—2

Raw complaint counts aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports. Counts vary with sales volume.

Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Mazda CX-5 or Nissan Murano?

Repair costs favor the CX-5 at an estimated $447 a year, against $507 for the Murano. That $60 gap adds up to about $300 over five years. The CX-5 also needs fewer unscheduled shop visits, 0.3 a year against 0.5. Only 8% of its repairs turn out to be major, compared with 14% for the Murano. A cracked cylinder head is the exception, with quotes reaching $8,000 on a CX-5.

How Does Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Murano Reliability Compare by Year?

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Murano year-by-year reliability scores
YearMazda CX-5Nissan MuranoEdge
202694/1000R / 0C82/1000R / 1CMazda CX-5
202582/1003R / 25C74/1002R / 14CMazda CX-5
202381/1002R / 96C82/1000R / 6CNissan Murano
202287/1000R / 50C82/1000R / 5CMazda CX-5
202183/1000R / 129C82/1000R / 14CMazda CX-5
202086/1000R / 94C74/1002R / 41CMazda CX-5
201975/1002R / 229C77/1001R / 39CNissan Murano
201871/1003R / 310C82/1000R / 14CNissan Murano

Best years to cross-shop: The 2022 Mazda CX-5 scored 87/100 and the 2023 Nissan Murano scored 82/100 — the strongest shared model years that have been on the road for at least two years, where available.

Who Should Buy the Mazda CX-5 vs the Nissan Murano?

Choose the CX-5 if you want lower running costs and fewer shop trips. Target the 2022 model year, one of its strongest, and avoid 2018 and 2019, its weakest. Ask for proof of oil-leak inspections and test the touchscreen for random inputs. Cracked heads cluster between about 30,000 and 80,000 miles, so a car in that range deserves a close look. Choose the Murano if you want a car with far fewer owner complaints on file and can accept a higher yearly repair average. Target 2018 or 2021, its strongest years, and avoid 2025 and 2020, its weakest. On a long test drive, watch for the forward collision warning shutting off, check that the passenger airbag light behaves, and feel for hesitation when the transmission engages. If intermittent brake or driver-assist faults worry you most, the CX-5 looks safer on the repair numbers, though it has its own brake and radar reports.

Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Murano: Common Questions

Is the Mazda CX-5 more reliable than the Nissan Murano?
Yes, slightly. The CX-5 rates excellent and the Murano good. The CX-5 needs fewer unscheduled shop visits, 0.3 a year against 0.5, and its repairs are less often major. Its cracked cylinder heads keep the lead narrow.
Which has more recalls, the CX-5 or the Murano?
The CX-5 has more. Federal recall records show 11 recalls across 9 model years for the CX-5 and 5 across 8 model years for the Murano. Check any specific car's VIN for open recalls before you buy.
Which is cheaper to repair, the CX-5 or the Murano?
The CX-5 is cheaper. Independent repair-cost data puts it at $447 a year against $507 for the Murano, roughly $300 less over five years. A major repair is also less likely on the CX-5, at 8% against 14%.
What is the biggest problem with the Mazda CX-5?
Cracked cylinder heads. They leak oil onto the hot exhaust side, causing a burning smell, white smoke, or pooled oil, and often no warning light appears until oil runs low. Failures cluster between about 30,000 and 80,000 miles, and quotes reach $8,000.
Does the Nissan Murano have brake problems?
Some owners report them, though complaints are few. In one, the pedal sank to the floor while the car rolled before braking returned. In another, a dealer warned braking might fail intermittently and replaced the ABS motor. Two brake complaints are crash-linked.

Decided between Mazda CX-5 and Nissan Murano? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.

Look Up a VIN →

How we score the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan Murano

Scores weight complaint severity at 35%, repair costs at 30%, recall impact at 20%, and the spread of complaints across systems at 15%, with complaint counts adjusted for US sales. Read the full methodology.

See incorrect data? Report an issue