- Home
- Land Rover
- Range Rover Sport
- vs Volvo XC90
Last updated: 2026-07-17
Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs Volvo XC90: Reliability Compared

Land Rover Range Rover Sport

Volvo XC90
Choosing between the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and the Volvo XC90? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize sedans.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Volvo XC90 currently leads with an average score of 72/100 compared to 57/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and Volvo XC90 Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Volvo XC90 is more reliable than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, scoring 72/100 vs 57/100.
The Volvo XC90 demonstrates superior reliability compared to the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, with an average reliability score of 72/100 against the Range Rover's 54/100. The XC90's recall history is significantly better, with 39 recalls over nine years compared to the Range Rover Sport's 177. Additionally, the XC90 has a lower owner complaint rate of 4.2 per 10,000 sold, while the Range Rover Sport suffers from a much higher rate of 56.4. The XC90 also benefits from an estimated annual repair cost of $851, providing a more reliable and cost-effective option in the midsize SUV segment.
Key Differences
- 1Volvo XC90 has 138 fewer total recalls
- 2Volvo XC90 has 52.2 fewer complaints per 10k sold
- 3Volvo XC90 scores 15 points higher in reliability
Category Scoreboard
Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs Volvo XC90: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Volvo XC90 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 57/100 | 72/100 |
| Years Tracked | 9 | 9 |
| Total Recalls | 177 | 39 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 56.4 | 4.2 |
| Year Wins | 1 | 8 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and Volvo XC90?
The Volvo XC90 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport exhibit distinct problem profiles. The XC90 reports fewer overall complaints at 229, with significant issues in the electrical system (58 complaints) and service brakes (23 complaints), the latter of which includes three crash-linked incidents. In contrast, the Range Rover Sport has a much higher total of 757 complaints, with the electrical system (185 complaints) and power train (89 complaints) being the most problematic areas, the latter having ten crash-linked incidents. While both models share issues in the electrical and power train systems, the Range Rover Sport shows a more severe problem profile, especially in crash-linked complaints within the power train and steering categories.
| Component | Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Volvo XC90 |
|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 13.8Above Avg | 1.1Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 6.6Average | 0.5Very Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 6.6Average | 0.2Very Low |
| ENGINE | 4.8Average | 0.2Very Low |
| STEERING | 3.7Average | 0.1Very Low |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | 3.5Average | 0.1Very Low |
| STRUCTURE | 1.6Low | 0.1Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | 1.6Low | —None |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 1.1Low | 0.4Very Low |
| SUSPENSION | 1.3Low | —None |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING | 1.2Low | —None |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | 1.1Low | —None |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.7Very Low | —None |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.5Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES | 0.4Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| VISIBILITY | 0.4Very Low | —None |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | —None | 0.3Very Low |
| LANE DEPARTURE | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| SEAT BELTS | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 0.1Very Low | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Land Rover Range Rover Sport or Volvo XC90?
How Does Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs Volvo XC90 Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Volvo XC90 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 75/1003R / 0C | 73/1002R / 2C | Land Rover Range Rover Sport |
| 2025 | 68/1009R / 24C | 74/1003R / 23C | Volvo XC90 |
| 2024 | 64/10022R / 47C | 73/1003R / 26C | Volvo XC90 |
| 2023 | 52/10027R / 125C | 70/1006R / 39C | Volvo XC90 |
| 2022 | 53/10023R / 94C | 72/1004R / 27C | Volvo XC90 |
| 2021 | 53/10023R / 72C | 72/1005R / 17C | Volvo XC90 |
| 2020 | 42/10037R / 138C | 71/1007R / 24C | Volvo XC90 |
| 2019 | 56/10014R / 90C | 71/1006R / 31C | Volvo XC90 |
| 2018 | 47/10019R / 167C | 71/1003R / 40C | Volvo XC90 |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Sport scored 75/100 and the 2025 Volvo XC90 scored 74/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs the Volvo XC90?
Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs Volvo XC90: Common Questions
- Is the Land Rover Range Rover Sport more reliable than the Volvo XC90?
- Based on our data, the Volvo XC90 is more reliable with an average score of 72/100 compared to 57/100. That's a significant difference worth considering.
- Which has more recalls, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport or the Volvo XC90?
- The Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more recalls (177) compared to the Volvo XC90 (39). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport or the Volvo XC90?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Volvo XC90 has a lower complaint rate at 4.2 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 56.4 for the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Land Rover Range Rover Sport comparisons
Decided between Land Rover Range Rover Sport and Volvo XC90? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue