Last updated: 2026-10-10
Mazda CX-90 vs Toyota 4Runner: Reliability Compared

Mazda CX-90

Toyota 4Runner
Reliability favors the Toyota 4RUNNER over the Mazda CX-90 by a wide margin. Owners filed far fewer complaints per vehicle sold, and the CX-90's hybrid shutdowns and sticking steering drive the gap. The CX-90 also packed its recalls into just three model years.
How Do the Mazda CX-90 and Toyota 4Runner Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Toyota 4Runner is more reliable than the Mazda CX-90, scoring 80/100 vs 58/100.
Reliability favors the 4Runner by a large gap. Owners filed about 1.5 complaints per 10,000 sold, against 111.2 for the CX-90. The 4Runner's trouble is spread over steering shake, brake noise, and wiring faults. The CX-90's worst reports involve hybrid shutdowns, cars that will not shift out of park, and steering that sticks, often in the first weeks of ownership. The CX-90 also packed 13 recalls into only three model years.
Key Differences
- 1Toyota 4Runner has 109.7 fewer complaints per 10k sold
- 2Toyota 4Runner scores 22 points higher in reliability
- 3Mazda CX-90 has 4 fewer total recalls
Category Scoreboard
Mazda CX-90 vs Toyota 4Runner: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Mazda CX-90 | Toyota 4Runner |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 58/100 | 80/100 |
| Years Tracked | 3 | 9 |
| Total Recalls | 13 | 17 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 111.2 | 1.5 |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2026 NHTSA | 2026 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 0 | 3 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Mazda CX-90 and Toyota 4Runner?
Steering shake at 50 to 70 mph that tires and alignments do not cure is the top 4Runner complaint. The CX-90's steering problem is different and more dangerous: the wheel binds in turns, locks at full lock, or pulls toward the road edge, with 5 crash-linked reports. Only the 4Runner has a serious air bag pattern, with front air bags that failed to deploy in crashes. Only the CX-90 lists crash-linked forward collision avoidance and power train problems, including a missed warning before a rear-end hit and stalls in traffic. Its hybrid shutdowns also strand cars at very low mileage.
| Component | Mazda CX-90 | Toyota 4Runner |
|---|---|---|
| STEERING | 31.8High | 0.2Very Low |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 17.5High | 0.1Very Low |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 11.5Above Avg | —None |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 8.7Above Avg | 0.2Very Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 8.3Above Avg | —None |
| ENGINE | 6.8Average | —None |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 6.4Average | —None |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | 4Average | —None |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 2.8Low | 0.2Very Low |
| STRUCTURE | 1.6Low | 0.1Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| SUSPENSION | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| FUEL SYSTEM | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | —None | —None |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | —None | —None |
| SEAT BELTS | —None | —None |
| TIRES | —None | —None |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | —None | —None |
| VISIBILITY | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
How Does Mazda CX-90 vs Toyota 4Runner Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Mazda CX-90 | Toyota 4Runner | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 72/1000R / 0C | 84/1000R / 0C | Toyota 4Runner |
| 2025 | 63/1002R / 21C | 81/1001R / 36C | Toyota 4Runner |
| 2024 | 38/10011R / 259C | 79/1001R / 8C | Toyota 4Runner |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2024 Mazda CX-90 scored 38/100 and the 2024 Toyota 4Runner scored 79/100 — the strongest shared model years that have been on the road for at least two years, where available.
Who Should Buy the Mazda CX-90 vs the Toyota 4Runner?
Mazda CX-90 vs Toyota 4Runner: Common Questions
- Is the Toyota 4RUNNER more reliable than the Mazda CX-90?
- Yes, the 4RUNNER leads by a large gap. It has about 1.5 owner complaints per 10,000 sold, while the CX-90 has 111.2. The CX-90's complaints include hybrid shutdowns, cars stuck in park, and steering that binds in turns. The 4RUNNER's main issues are steering shake and brake noise.
- Which has more recalls, the 4RUNNER or the CX-90?
- The 4RUNNER has more in total, with 17 recalls across 9 model years. The CX-90 has 13 across just 3 model years. That makes the CX-90's pace much faster. Check any specific car's VIN for open recalls before you buy either one.
- Which is cheaper to repair, the 4RUNNER or the CX-90?
- The data covers the 4RUNNER only. Independent repair-cost data puts it at about $514 a year, with 0.4 unscheduled shop visits and a 13% chance that a repair is major. There is no matching repair-cost figure for the CX-90, so a direct cost comparison is not possible.
- What is the biggest problem with the Mazda CX-90?
- Steering is the largest complaint area, with 80 reports and 5 crash-linked. The wheel binds, sticks, or locks at full lock, and none of the reports mention a confirmed fix. Hybrid electrical shutdowns come next, where cars lose power and will not shift out of park.
- Are there safety concerns with the Toyota 4RUNNER?
- Yes. Air bags have 24 complaints, 20 of them crash-linked. Some reports say front air bags did not deploy in serious collisions. Steering shake at highway speed is the top complaint. Also check for underbody rust and wiring damage, which some owners reported.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Mazda CX-90 comparisons
Decided between Mazda CX-90 and Toyota 4Runner? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
How we score the Mazda CX-90 and Toyota 4Runner
Scores weight complaint severity at 35%, repair costs at 30%, recall impact at 20%, and the spread of complaints across systems at 15%, with complaint counts adjusted for US sales. Read the full methodology.
See incorrect data? Report an issue