Is the Mazda CX-9 more reliable than the Volkswagen Atlas?

Based on our data, the Mazda CX-9 is more reliable with an average score of 76/100 compared to 54/100. That's a significant difference worth considering.

Which has more recalls, the Mazda CX-9 or the Volkswagen Atlas?

The Volkswagen Atlas has more recalls (119) compared to the Mazda CX-9 (6). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.

Which has fewer owner complaints, the Mazda CX-9 or the Volkswagen Atlas?

Adjusted for sales volume, the Mazda CX-9 has a lower complaint rate at 15 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 36.8 for the Volkswagen Atlas. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.

Is the Mazda CX-9 or Volkswagen Atlas safer?

Both the Mazda CX-9 and Volkswagen Atlas received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.

Last updated: 2026-07-26

Mazda CX-9 vs Volkswagen Atlas: Reliability Compared

More Reliable

Mazda CX-9

Good

Volkswagen Atlas

Mixed

Choosing between the Mazda CX-9 and the Volkswagen Atlas? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.

Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Mazda CX-9 currently leads with an average score of 76/100 compared to 54/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.

How Do the Mazda CX-9 and Volkswagen Atlas Generations Compare?

As of 2026, the Volkswagen Atlas is in its first generation, which debuted in 2017 and received facelifts in 2021 and 2024. Being late in its generation cycle, the Atlas benefits from a mature platform where initial issues have likely been addressed, enhancing its reliability. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-9 is in its second generation, launched in 2016. With no redesign since, it also represents a mature model, suggesting that potential early-generation problems have been resolved. Both the Atlas and CX-9, being in their later stages, offer well-sorted reliability, appealing to buyers prioritizing dependability.

Verdict

The Mazda CX-9 is more reliable than the Volkswagen Atlas, scoring 76/100 vs 54/100.

The Mazda CX-9 outshines the Volkswagen Atlas in terms of reliability, with a significantly higher average reliability score of 76/100 compared to the Atlas's 54/100. The CX-9 has a much lower rate of owner complaints at 15 per 10,000 units sold, versus the Atlas's 36.8. Recall history also favors the Mazda, with only 6 recalls over 6 years compared to the Atlas's 119 over 9 years. While the Atlas is burdened by frequent issues with its electrical system and airbags, the CX-9's estimated annual repair cost of $539 further solidifies its advantage as the more dependable choice.

Key Differences

1Mazda CX-9 has 113 fewer total recalls
2Mazda CX-9 scores 22 points higher in reliability
3Mazda CX-9 has 21.8 fewer complaints per 10k sold

Category Scoreboard

3Mazda CX-9

—

0Volkswagen Atlas

Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsComplaint RateSafety Rating

Mazda CX-9 vs Volkswagen Atlas: Which Is More Reliable?

Mazda CX-9 vs Volkswagen Atlas at-a-glance reliability comparison
Metric	Mazda CX-9	Volkswagen Atlas
Reliability Score	76/100	54/100
Years Tracked	6	9
Total Recalls	6	119
Complaints per 10k Sold	15	36.8
Safety RatingNHTSA overall	2023 NHTSA	2026 NHTSA
Frontal
Side
Rollover
Year Wins	6	0

What Are the Common Problems With the Mazda CX-9 and Volkswagen Atlas?

The Volkswagen Atlas exhibits a higher volume of complaints, particularly in the electrical system and air bags, with 512 and 364 complaints respectively, including 24 crash-linked issues in these categories combined. The Mazda CX-9, while having significantly fewer total complaints, shows its most frequent issues in the engine category with 95 complaints, though none are crash-linked. Notably, the Atlas also faces challenges with service brakes and power train issues, each with multiple crash-linked incidents, highlighting potential safety concerns. In contrast, the CX-9's air bag complaints, although fewer in number, are all crash-linked, indicating a critical area of concern for safety.

Mazda CX-9 vs Volkswagen Atlas common problem areas comparison
Component	Mazda CX-9	Volkswagen Atlas
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM	1.5Low	8.9Above Avg
ENGINE	5.7Average	3.1Average
AIR BAGS	0.2Very Low	6.4Average
UNKNOWN OR OTHER	2Low	2.8Low
SERVICE BRAKES	0.7Very Low	3.8Average
POWER TRAIN	1.2Low	1.6Low
STEERING	0.4Very Low	1.6Low
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE	—None	1.6Low
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM	0.1Very Low	0.4Very Low
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL	—None	0.5Very Low
STRUCTURE	0.3Very Low	—None
SUSPENSION	0.2Very Low	—None
BACK OVER PREVENTION	0.2Very Low	—None
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING	0.1Very Low	0.1Very Low
SEATS	—None	0.2Very Low
Chest Clip	0.1Very Low	—None
VISIBILITY/WIPER	0.1Very Low	—None
FUEL SYSTEM	0.1Very Low	—None
SEAT BELTS	—None	0.1Very Low

Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.

Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Mazda CX-9 or Volkswagen Atlas?

Based on industry estimates, the Mazda CX-9 incurs an annual repair cost of $539, with an average of 0.6 repair visits per year and a 10% risk of needing major repairs. Unfortunately, comparable data for the Volkswagen Atlas is unavailable, making a direct annual cost comparison challenging. However, the CX-9's repair frequency suggests fewer disruptions, and its major repair risk is relatively moderate. If cost predictability and lower repair frequency are priorities, the CX-9 presents a more reliable option for budget-conscious buyers, offering peace of mind in terms of maintenance expenses over the years.

How Does Mazda CX-9 vs Volkswagen Atlas Reliability Compare by Year?

Mazda CX-9 vs Volkswagen Atlas year-by-year reliability scores
Year	Mazda CX-9	Volkswagen Atlas	Edge
2023	81/1000R / 12C	58/10011R / 114C	Mazda CX-9
2022	81/1000R / 9C	50/10014R / 217C	Mazda CX-9
2021	77/1001R / 35C	44/10030R / 540C	Mazda CX-9
2020	78/1001R / 19C	57/10015R / 116C	Mazda CX-9
2019	73/1002R / 52C	48/10011R / 437C	Mazda CX-9
2018	66/1002R / 125C	44/10016R / 444C	Mazda CX-9

Best years to cross-shop: The 2023 Mazda CX-9 scored 81/100 and the 2023 Volkswagen Atlas scored 58/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.

Who Should Buy the Mazda CX-9 vs the Volkswagen Atlas?

If you prioritize reliability and peace of mind, the Mazda CX-9 stands out as the better choice. With a reliability score of 76/100 and only 6 total recalls, it’s a dependable option for those who want fewer unexpected issues. The Mazda CX-9 also boasts fewer owner complaints at 15 per 10,000 sold and has a moderate estimated annual repair cost of $539. With a lower repair frequency of 0.6 times per year and a 10% risk of major repairs, it’s a solid option for families and individuals looking for a hassle-free driving experience. On the other hand, if you are considering the Volkswagen Atlas, be prepared for potential challenges. With a reliability score of 54/100 and a staggering 119 recalls, it may not offer the same level of dependability. Additionally, with 36.8 owner complaints per 10,000 sold, the Atlas could demand more attention and maintenance over time. This model might suit those who are specifically drawn to its features or design, but be aware of the potential for higher repair needs.

Mazda CX-9 vs Volkswagen Atlas: Common Questions

Is the Mazda CX-9 more reliable than the Volkswagen Atlas?: Based on our data, the Mazda CX-9 is more reliable with an average score of 76/100 compared to 54/100. That's a significant difference worth considering.
Which has more recalls, the Mazda CX-9 or the Volkswagen Atlas?: The Volkswagen Atlas has more recalls (119) compared to the Mazda CX-9 (6). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
Which has fewer owner complaints, the Mazda CX-9 or the Volkswagen Atlas?: Adjusted for sales volume, the Mazda CX-9 has a lower complaint rate at 15 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 36.8 for the Volkswagen Atlas. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Is the Mazda CX-9 or Volkswagen Atlas safer?: Both the Mazda CX-9 and Volkswagen Atlas received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.

More Mazda CX-9 comparisons

Mazda CX-9 vs Toyota Highlander reliability Mazda CX-9 vs Hyundai Palisade reliability Mazda CX-9 vs Honda Pilot reliability Mazda CX-9 vs KIA Telluride reliability Mazda CX-9 reliability by year Mazda CX-9 years to avoid

More Volkswagen Atlas comparisons

Volkswagen Atlas vs Ford Explorer reliability Volkswagen Atlas vs Toyota Highlander reliability Volkswagen Atlas vs Honda Pilot reliability Volkswagen Atlas vs Chevrolet Traverse reliability Volkswagen Atlas reliability by year Volkswagen Atlas years to avoid

Decided between Mazda CX-9 and Volkswagen Atlas? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.

Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.

Look Up a VIN →

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue