Last updated: 2026-07-26
Dodge Journey vs Mazda CX-9: Reliability Compared

Dodge Journey

Mazda CX-9
Choosing between the Dodge Journey and the Mazda CX-9? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Mazda CX-9 currently leads with an average score of 76/100 compared to 74/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Dodge Journey and Mazda CX-9 Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Mazda CX-9 is more reliable than the Dodge Journey, scoring 76/100 vs 74/100.
The Dodge Journey edges out the Mazda CX-9 in reliability with a slightly higher average score of 78/100 compared to 76/100 for the CX-9. However, the Mazda CX-9 has a marginally lower owner complaint rate at 15 per 10,000 sold, versus the Journey's 16.8. Both vehicles have faced several recalls, with the Journey experiencing eight over five years and the CX-9 six over six years. While repair costs are relatively similar, the CX-9's slightly lower estimated annual repair cost of $539 could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious buyers.
Key Differences
- 1Mazda CX-9 costs $23 less per year to repair
- 2Mazda CX-9 has 3.0 fewer complaints per 10k sold
- 3Mazda CX-9 scores 2 points higher in reliability
Category Scoreboard
Dodge Journey vs Mazda CX-9: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Dodge Journey | Mazda CX-9 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 74/100 | 76/100 |
| Years Tracked | 3 | 6 |
| Total Recalls | 8 | 6 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 18 | 15 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $562/yr | $539/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.3/yr | 0.6/yr |
| Major Repair Risk | 12% | 10% |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2020 NHTSA | 2023 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 2 | 1 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Dodge Journey and Mazda CX-9?
The Mazda CX-9 primarily faces issues with its engine, accounting for 95 complaints, and also has significant concerns with the electrical system and power train, with crash-linked incidents reported in the unknown or other, power train, service brakes, steering, and air bags categories. In contrast, the Dodge Journey exhibits a higher number of electrical system complaints, totaling 97, and shows notable crash-linked issues in the air bags and exterior lighting. While the CX-9's engine problems are more pronounced, the Journey's air bag system poses a greater safety concern, with seven crash-linked complaints. Both models have challenges in the unknown or other category, but the Journey's broader distribution of problem types suggests a wider range of potential reliability issues.
| Component | Dodge Journey | Mazda CX-9 |
|---|---|---|
| ENGINE | 0.8Very Low | 5.7Average |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 4.6Average | 1.5Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 2.9Low | 2Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 1.2Low | 1.2Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.9Very Low | 0.7Very Low |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | 1.2Low | 0.2Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.8Very Low | 0.4Very Low |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | 1.1Low | —None |
| AIR BAGS | 0.8Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.5Very Low | —None |
| STRUCTURE | 0.1Very Low | 0.3Very Low |
| SEAT BELTS | 0.2Very Low | —None |
| SUSPENSION | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| SEATS | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| TIRES | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| Chest Clip | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| FUEL SYSTEM | —None | 0.1Very Low |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Dodge Journey or Mazda CX-9?
How Does Dodge Journey vs Mazda CX-9 Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Dodge Journey | Mazda CX-9 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 77/1001R / 61C | 78/1001R / 19C | Mazda CX-9 |
| 2019 | 78/1001R / 92C | 73/1002R / 52C | Dodge Journey |
| 2018 | 68/1006R / 223C | 66/1002R / 125C | Dodge Journey |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2019 Dodge Journey scored 78/100 and the 2020 Mazda CX-9 scored 78/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Dodge Journey vs the Mazda CX-9?
Dodge Journey vs Mazda CX-9: Common Questions
- Is the Dodge Journey more reliable than the Mazda CX-9?
- Based on our data, the Mazda CX-9 is more reliable with an average score of 76/100 compared to 74/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the Dodge Journey or the Mazda CX-9?
- The Dodge Journey has more recalls (8) compared to the Mazda CX-9 (6). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Dodge Journey or the Mazda CX-9?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Mazda CX-9 has a lower complaint rate at 15 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 18 for the Dodge Journey. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the Dodge Journey or the Mazda CX-9?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Mazda CX-9 is cheaper to maintain at $539/year versus $562/year for the Dodge Journey.
- Is the Dodge Journey or Mazda CX-9 safer?
- Based on NHTSA crash test ratings, the Mazda CX-9 has a higher overall safety rating of 5/5 stars compared to 4/5 for the Dodge Journey. Check sub-ratings (frontal, side, rollover) above for a more detailed safety comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Dodge Journey comparisons
Decided between Dodge Journey and Mazda CX-9? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue