Last updated: 2026-03-04
Ford Explorer vs Kia Telluride: Reliability Compared

Ford Explorer

Kia Telluride
Choosing between the Ford Explorer and the Kia Telluride? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. Both models currently share an average reliability score of 66/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Ford Explorer and Kia Telluride Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Ford Explorer and Kia Telluride are evenly matched with a reliability score of 66/100.
The Kia Telluride edges out the Ford Explorer in reliability, with a higher average reliability score of 71/100 compared to the Explorer's 68/100. The Telluride also has a significantly lower number of recalls, with 27 over six years versus the Explorer's 117 over nine years. While the Telluride has a higher owner complaint rate per 10,000 sold at 23.3 compared to the Explorer's 6.8, its estimated annual repair cost is notably lower at $573 compared to $732 for the Explorer. Overall, the Telluride presents a more reliable option due to its lower recall history and repair costs.
Key Differences
- 1Kia Telluride costs $159 less per year to repair
- 2Kia Telluride has 90 fewer total recalls
- 3Ford Explorer has 16.5 fewer complaints per 10k sold
Category Scoreboard
Ford Explorer vs Kia Telluride: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Ford Explorer | Kia Telluride |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 66/100 | 66/100 |
| Years Tracked | 9 | 6 |
| Total Recalls | 117 | 27 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 6.8 | 23.3 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $732/yr | $573/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.2/yr | 0.4/yr |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2026 NHTSA | 2025 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 3 | 3 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Ford Explorer and Kia Telluride?
The Ford Explorer exhibits a high number of complaints in the power train category with 618 reports, including 12 linked to crashes, indicating a significant reliability concern in this area. In contrast, the Kia Telluride's most reported issue lies within the unknown or other category, with 301 complaints, but only 2 are crash-linked, suggesting less severe implications. The Explorer also shows a higher incidence of crash-linked issues in its service brakes (11 complaints) compared to the Telluride (6 complaints), pointing to potentially more severe safety concerns. While both models face electrical system and engine complaints, the Ford Explorer generally shows a broader range of issues impacting safety-critical components.
| Component | Ford Explorer | Kia Telluride |
|---|---|---|
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 1.1Low | 4.4Average |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | —None | 4.2Average |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 0.7Very Low | 2.8Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 1.6Low | 1.7Low |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | —None | 2.5Low |
| ENGINE | 0.4Very Low | 1.9Low |
| STRUCTURE | 1Very Low | 0.9Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.2Very Low | 0.5Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.2Very Low | 0.3Very Low |
| SUSPENSION | 0.1Very Low | 0.3Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | 0.1Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| VISIBILITY | —None | 0.3Very Low |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | 0.2Very Low | —None |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| SEATS | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| SEAT BELTS | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | —None | —None |
| FUEL SYSTEM | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Ford Explorer or Kia Telluride?
How Does Ford Explorer vs Kia Telluride Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Ford Explorer | Kia Telluride | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 72/10014R / 65C | 78/1002R / 32C | Kia Telluride |
| 2024 | 73/1006R / 14C | 69/1004R / 180C | Ford Explorer |
| 2023 | 71/10012R / 84C | 68/1005R / 161C | Ford Explorer |
| 2022 | 65/10021R / 208C | 63/1006R / 280C | Ford Explorer |
| 2021 | 62/10022R / 354C | 63/1004R / 280C | Kia Telluride |
| 2020 | 54/10029R / 1066C | 55/1006R / 667C | Kia Telluride |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2024 Ford Explorer scored 73/100 and the 2025 Kia Telluride scored 78/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Ford Explorer vs the Kia Telluride?
Ford Explorer vs Kia Telluride: Common Questions
- Is the Ford Explorer more reliable than the Kia Telluride?
- They're very close — both average 66/100 in our reliability scoring. Other factors like repair costs and specific year models may tip the decision.
- Which has more recalls, the Ford Explorer or the Kia Telluride?
- The Ford Explorer has more recalls (117) compared to the Kia Telluride (27). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Ford Explorer or the Kia Telluride?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Ford Explorer has a lower complaint rate at 6.8 per 10,000 sold versus 23.3 for the Kia Telluride. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the Ford Explorer or the Kia Telluride?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Kia Telluride is cheaper to maintain at $573/year versus $732/year for the Ford Explorer.
- Is the Ford Explorer or Kia Telluride safer?
- Both the Ford Explorer and Kia Telluride received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Ford Explorer comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue