Last updated: 2026-03-14

Chrysler Voyager vs Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon: Reliability Compared

Choosing between the Chrysler Voyager and the Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize minivans.

Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Chrysler Voyager currently leads with an average score of 73/100 compared to 70/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.

How Do the Chrysler Voyager and Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon Generations Compare?

As of 2026, the Chrysler Voyager is in its sixth generation, which began in 2020 and saw a model refresh in 2022. Being relatively new in its cycle, potential buyers should be aware that newer platforms can sometimes experience first-year issues, although the 2022 refresh might have addressed early concerns. The Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon is in its third generation, which started in 2024. The previous second generation, lasting from 2014 to 2023, included a significant facelift in 2019. With the current generation still in its early stages, buyers should consider that initial model years can occasionally encounter teething problems, whereas the mature second generation was likely more refined due to its longer production span.

Verdict

The Chrysler Voyager is more reliable than the Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon, scoring 73/100 vs 70/100.

The Chrysler Voyager edges out the Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon in reliability with a higher average score of 73/100 compared to 70/100. The Voyager also has a significantly lower owner complaint rate of 0.4 per 10,000 sold versus the Transit-Connect-Wagon's 2 per 10,000, suggesting fewer customer-reported issues relative to sales. Although the Voyager has faced 20 recalls over seven years, fewer than the Transit-Connect-Wagon's 27 over six years, its estimated annual repair cost of $647 provides an additional advantage. Overall, the Chrysler Voyager demonstrates a slight reliability advantage, particularly in terms of owner satisfaction and maintenance predictability.

Key Differences

  1. 1Chrysler Voyager has 7 fewer total recalls
  2. 2Chrysler Voyager scores 3 points higher in reliability
  3. 3Chrysler Voyager has 1.6 fewer complaints per 10k sold

Category Scoreboard

4Chrysler Voyager
0Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon
Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsComplaint RateSafety Rating

Chrysler Voyager vs Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon: Which Is More Reliable?

Chrysler Voyager vs Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon at-a-glance reliability comparison
MetricChrysler VoyagerFord Transit-Connect-Wagon
Reliability Score73/10070/100
Years Tracked76
Total Recalls2027
Complaints per 10k Sold0.42
Safety RatingNHTSA overall
2026 NHTSA
2023 NHTSA
Frontal
Side
Rollover
Year Wins22

What Are the Common Problems With the Chrysler Voyager and Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon?

The Chrysler Voyager exhibits a relatively balanced distribution of issues, with the most significant areas being the electrical system and steering, each comprising a notable portion of its 30 total complaints. In contrast, the Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon faces a considerably higher volume of complaints, specifically with 37 linked to the power train, including one crash-related incident, and 19 associated with service brakes. While both models report steering concerns, the Ford's issues with power train and brakes suggest a more severe reliability concern, particularly given the crash-linked complaints in these categories. Additionally, the Transit-Connect-Wagon shows a wider variety of reported problem areas, indicating broader systemic challenges compared to the Voyager.

Chrysler Voyager vs Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon common problem areas comparison
ComponentChrysler VoyagerFord Transit-Connect-Wagon
POWER TRAINNone0.7Very Low
SERVICE BRAKESNone0.4Very Low
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM0.1Very Low0.1Very Low
STEERING0.1Very Low0.1Very Low
UNKNOWN OR OTHERNone0.2Very Low
ENGINE0.1Very LowNone
VISIBILITYNone0.1Very Low
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROLNoneNone

Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.

Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Chrysler Voyager or Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon?

The Chrysler Voyager incurs an annual repair cost of $647, with an average of 0.4 repair visits per year, according to independent repair cost data. This suggests that owners can expect relatively infrequent trips to the mechanic, which can be beneficial for minimizing downtime and inconvenience. Unfortunately, specific data for the Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon's repair costs and frequency is unavailable, making direct comparisons challenging. However, the known figures for the Voyager highlight its predictable maintenance expenses, potentially offering better value for cost-conscious buyers seeking reliability and lower maintenance frequency. Without data on the Transit-Connect-Wagon, the Voyager stands out as a more transparent option for budgeting future repair costs.

How Does Chrysler Voyager vs Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon Reliability Compare by Year?

Chrysler Voyager vs Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon year-by-year reliability scores
YearChrysler VoyagerFord Transit-Connect-WagonEdge
202368/1006R / 2C78/1000R / 0CFord Transit-Connect-Wagon
202270/1004R / 4C72/1001R / 4CFord Transit-Connect-Wagon
202174/1002R / 14C69/1004R / 5CChrysler Voyager
202077/1001R / 10C67/1008R / 27CChrysler Voyager

Best years to cross-shop: The 2020 Chrysler Voyager scored 77/100 and the 2023 Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon scored 78/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.

Who Should Buy the Chrysler Voyager vs the Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon?

If you prioritize low running costs and fewer owner complaints, the Chrysler Voyager might be the better choice. With a reliability score of 73/100 and an estimated annual repair cost of $647, it offers a balanced approach to maintenance. The Voyager has 20 total recalls and a low owner complaint rate of 0.4 per 10,000 sold, indicating fewer issues reported by drivers. However, be aware of potential problems in the electrical system and power train. On the other hand, if you're looking for a vehicle with potentially more robust service features, consider the Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon. While its reliability score is slightly lower at 70/100, it may appeal to those who prioritize specific functionalities. It has a higher recall count at 27 and more owner complaints, but it may offer advantages in areas like visibility and steering. Choose this option if these features align closely with your driving needs and you're prepared for potentially higher maintenance.

Chrysler Voyager vs Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon: Common Questions

Is the Chrysler Voyager more reliable than the Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon?
Based on our data, the Chrysler Voyager is more reliable with an average score of 73/100 compared to 70/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
Which has more recalls, the Chrysler Voyager or the Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon?
The Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon has more recalls (27) compared to the Chrysler Voyager (20). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
Which has fewer owner complaints, the Chrysler Voyager or the Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon?
Adjusted for sales volume, the Chrysler Voyager has a lower complaint rate at 0.4 per 10,000 sold versus 2 for the Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Is the Chrysler Voyager or Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon safer?
Based on NHTSA crash test ratings, the Chrysler Voyager has a higher overall safety rating of 5/5 stars compared to 4/5 for the Ford Transit-Connect-Wagon. Check sub-ratings (frontal, side, rollover) above for a more detailed safety comparison.

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue