- Home
- Ford
- Mustang Mach-E
- vs Toyota bZ4X
Last updated: 2026-05-15
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota bZ4X: Reliability Compared

Ford Mustang Mach-E

Toyota bZ4X
Choosing between the Ford Mustang Mach-E and the Toyota bZ4X? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Toyota bZ4X currently leads with an average score of 75/100 compared to 71/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota bZ4X Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Toyota bZ4X is more reliable than the Ford Mustang Mach-E, scoring 75/100 vs 71/100.
The Toyota Bz4x edges out the Ford Mustang Mach-E in terms of reliability, with a slightly higher average reliability score of 75 compared to 71. The Bz4x also has a lower recall count of 6 over three years, versus the Mach-E's 13 over four years, and reports fewer owner complaints at 7.1 per 10,000 sold compared to 10.7. While both vehicles share common issues with the electrical system, the Mach-E's additional problems with the power train and service brakes may contribute to its lower reliability perception. Overall, the Bz4x's superior recall history and complaint rate make it a more reliable choice.
Key Differences
- 1Toyota bZ4X has 7 fewer total recalls
- 2Toyota bZ4X scores 4 points higher in reliability
- 3Toyota bZ4X has 3.6 fewer complaints per 10k sold
Category Scoreboard
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota bZ4X: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Ford Mustang Mach-E | Toyota bZ4X |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 71/100 | 75/100 |
| Years Tracked | 4 | 3 |
| Total Recalls | 13 | 6 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2026 NHTSA | 2025 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 0 | 3 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota bZ4X?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E shows a higher problem profile with 147 total complaints compared to the Toyota Bz4x's 41 complaints. Notably, the Mach-E has significant issues with the electrical system, accounting for 50 complaints, and the power train, with 29 complaints, including one linked to a crash. Additionally, the Mach-E has several crash-linked complaints across categories such as unknown or other (3), vehicle speed control (2), and air bags (2), indicating potential safety concerns. In contrast, the Toyota Bz4x's most reported issue is also the electrical system but with only 11 complaints, and it lacks any crash-linked complaints, suggesting a less severe problem profile overall.
| Component | Ford Mustang Mach-E | Toyota bZ4X |
|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 3.6Average | 1.9Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 2.1Low | —None |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 1.2Low | 0.7Very Low |
| STRUCTURE | 0.3Very Low | 1Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.8Very Low | —None |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.7Very Low | —None |
| STEERING | 0.6Very Low | —None |
| SUSPENSION | —None | 0.3Very Low |
| TIRES | —None | 0.3Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | 0.2Very Low | —None |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 0.2Very Low | —None |
| ENGINE | 0.1Very Low | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
How Does Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota bZ4X Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Ford Mustang Mach-E | Toyota bZ4X | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 72/1005R / 8C | 76/1002R / 5C | Toyota bZ4X |
| 2024 | 74/1003R / 35C | 75/1003R / 21C | Toyota bZ4X |
| 2023 | 66/1003R / 104C | 73/1001R / 15C | Toyota bZ4X |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E scored 74/100 and the 2025 Toyota bZ4X scored 76/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Ford Mustang Mach-E vs the Toyota bZ4X?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota bZ4X: Common Questions
- Is the Ford Mustang Mach-E more reliable than the Toyota bZ4X?
- Based on our data, the Toyota bZ4X is more reliable with an average score of 75/100 compared to 71/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the Ford Mustang Mach-E or the Toyota bZ4X?
- The Ford Mustang Mach-E has more recalls (13) compared to the Toyota bZ4X (6). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Ford Mustang Mach-E or the Toyota bZ4X?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Toyota bZ4X has a lower complaint rate at 7.1 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 10.7 for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Is the Ford Mustang Mach-E or Toyota bZ4X safer?
- Both the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota bZ4X received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Ford Mustang Mach-E comparisons
Decided between Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota bZ4X? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue