Last updated: 2026-07-26
Cadillac Lyriq vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Reliability Compared
Cadillac Lyriq
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Choosing between the Cadillac Lyriq and the Ford Mustang Mach-E? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Ford Mustang Mach-E currently leads with an average score of 72/100 compared to 68/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Cadillac Lyriq and Ford Mustang Mach-E Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is more reliable than the Cadillac Lyriq, scoring 72/100 vs 68/100.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E edges out the Cadillac Lyriq in reliability with a higher average score of 72/100 compared to the Lyriq's 68/100. The Mach-E also has fewer owner complaints per 10,000 units, at 10.7 versus the Lyriq's 22.9, indicating a better customer satisfaction rate relative to sales volume. Both vehicles have faced a significant number of recalls, but the Lyriq's 16 recalls in three years surpass the Mach-E's 13 over four years, suggesting more consistent reliability challenges. Common issues with both models include the electrical system and service brakes, but the Mach-E's broader range of problems may still be a consideration for potential buyers.
Key Differences
- 1Ford Mustang Mach-E has 12.2 fewer complaints per 10k sold
- 2Ford Mustang Mach-E scores 4 points higher in reliability
- 3Ford Mustang Mach-E has 3 fewer total recalls
Category Scoreboard
Cadillac Lyriq vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Cadillac Lyriq | Ford Mustang Mach-E |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 68/100 | 72/100 |
| Years Tracked | 3 | 4 |
| Total Recalls | 16 | 13 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 22.9 | 10.7 |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2025 NHTSA | 2026 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 2 | 1 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Cadillac Lyriq and Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E and Cadillac Lyriq exhibit distinct problem profiles, with both vehicles showing a significant number of complaints related to their electrical systems, but the Mach-E has a higher frequency in this area. The Mach-E also faces notable issues with its power train and vehicle speed control, each including crash-linked incidents, suggesting potential safety concerns. On the other hand, the Lyriq has a significant number of complaints related to service brakes, with a substantial portion being crash-linked, indicating a critical area for further investigation. Additionally, the Lyriq experiences more issues with exterior lighting compared to the Mach-E, which may affect nighttime driving safety.
| Component | Cadillac Lyriq | Ford Mustang Mach-E |
|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 6.1Average | 3.6Average |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | 4.2Average | —None |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 3Low | 0.8Very Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 1.1Low | 2.1Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 1.6Low | 1.2Low |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 1.9Low | 0.2Very Low |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | 1.8Low | —None |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.5Very Low | 0.7Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.5Very Low | 0.6Very Low |
| STRUCTURE | 0.3Very Low | 0.3Very Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.3Very Low | —None |
| AIR BAGS | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| ENGINE | —None | 0.1Very Low |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
How Does Cadillac Lyriq vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Cadillac Lyriq | Ford Mustang Mach-E | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 73/1003R / 13C | 72/1005R / 8C | Cadillac Lyriq |
| 2024 | 64/1006R / 106C | 74/1003R / 35C | Ford Mustang Mach-E |
| 2023 | 67/1007R / 24C | 66/1003R / 104C | Cadillac Lyriq |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 Cadillac Lyriq scored 73/100 and the 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E scored 74/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Cadillac Lyriq vs the Ford Mustang Mach-E?
Cadillac Lyriq vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Common Questions
- Is the Cadillac Lyriq more reliable than the Ford Mustang Mach-E?
- Based on our data, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is more reliable with an average score of 72/100 compared to 68/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the Cadillac Lyriq or the Ford Mustang Mach-E?
- The Cadillac Lyriq has more recalls (16) compared to the Ford Mustang Mach-E (13). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Cadillac Lyriq or the Ford Mustang Mach-E?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a lower complaint rate at 10.7 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 22.9 for the Cadillac Lyriq. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Is the Cadillac Lyriq or Ford Mustang Mach-E safer?
- Both the Cadillac Lyriq and Ford Mustang Mach-E received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Cadillac Lyriq comparisons
Decided between Cadillac Lyriq and Ford Mustang Mach-E? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue