Last updated: 2026-10-10

Nissan vs Volvo: Which Make Is More Reliable?

Nissan comes out ahead of Volvo on reliability, with a clear edge. Cheaper upkeep and problems that are less concentrated in one system explain most of the gap. Both brands hold a good standing, so the choice comes down to cost and the specific model.

Is Nissan More Reliable Than Volvo?

MetricNissanVolvo
Avg Reliability Score77/10070/100
Models Tracked125
Avg Recalls per Model1428
Avg Complaints per Model531136
Avg Annual Repair Cost$523/yr$831/yr

Nissan Models

12 models ranked by reliability

Excellent Good Mixed Risky

Volvo Models

5 models ranked by reliability

S6072
S9068
Excellent Good Mixed Risky

Nissan vs Volvo: The Verdict

A clear edge goes to Nissan. Both brands stand good, and both draw about the same rate of complaints per car sold, so severity of complaints is even. The gap shows up elsewhere. Nissan upkeep runs about $523 a year against $831 for Volvo, and Nissan is stronger on recall impact and on how widely problems spread across systems. Volvo electrical trouble makes up 35% of its complaints, a heavier pile-up than Nissan's 23%.

Nissan also trends improving, while Volvo is stable. Nissan is stronger in both sedans and SUVs. Nissan's raw recall count is higher at 172 against 141, but that does not change the recall impact rating.

Where Nissan and Volvo Differ Most

ComponentWeightNissanVolvo
Complaint Severity

Owner complaints weighted by component severity

35%
67/100Good
67/100Good
Repair Costs

Annual maintenance and repair expenses

30%
76/100Good
66/100Good
Recall Impact

Safety recalls weighted by severity (park-it, park-outside)

20%
85/100Excellent
73/100Good
Issue Diversity

How many different systems have reported problems

15%
82/100Excellent
80/100Excellent

Dig into the components and recall impact stands out — Nissan outscores by 12 points there, which carries significant weight in the final number.

Nissan vs Volvo: Strengths and Weaknesses

Nissan

Strengths

  • Strong overall reliability (77/100 average)
  • Minimal recall impact — fewer safety-critical recalls
  • Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
  • Reasonable maintenance costs ($523/year avg)
  • Reliability trending upward in recent model years
  • 12 of 12 models rated Good or Excellent
  • Below-average repair frequency

Weaknesses

  • 41 fire-related complaints across lineup
  • Above-average repair severity when issues occur

Volvo

Strengths

  • Strong overall reliability (70/100 average)
  • Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
  • 5 of 5 models rated Good or Excellent
  • Below-average repair frequency

Weaknesses

  • High maintenance costs ($831/year avg)
  • Above-average repair severity when issues occur

How Reliable Are Nissan and Volvo Lineups?

Distribution of model reliability ratings across each make's lineup:

Nissan

Excellent (80+)2 models
Good (60–79)10 models
Mixed (40–59)0 models
Poor (0–39)0 models

Volvo

Excellent (80+)0 models
Good (60–79)5 models
Mixed (40–59)0 models
Poor (0–39)0 models

Which Make Is Cheaper to Maintain: Nissan or Volvo?

Based on independent repair cost data, Nissan is cheaper to maintain at an average of $523/year compared to $831/year for Volvo. That's a difference of $308/year, which adds up significantly over the life of the vehicle.

Nissan Repair Cost Range

$456 – $748/yr

Average: $523/yr

Volvo Repair Cost Range

$746 – $976/yr

Average: $831/yr

Nissan vs Volvo Reliability by Vehicle Type

How the two makes compare within each vehicle category they both compete in:

CategoryNissanVolvoWinner
Sedans(5 vs 2 models)75/10070/100Nissan
SUVs(6 vs 3 models)77/10069/100Nissan

Nissan wins 2 out of 2 shared categories.

Common Problems: Nissan vs Volvo

ComponentNissanVolvo
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM23%1,28335%180
UNKNOWN OR OTHER17%92913%70
SERVICE BRAKES11%59012%62
POWER TRAIN11%6095%26
ENGINE8%4362%13
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE6%3422%8
STEERING5%2725%28
AIR BAGS4%2051%4
VISIBILITY/WIPER2%1244%21
STRUCTURE2%963%18

Share of each make's complaints, with counts below.

Nissan vs Volvo Complaint Severity: Crashes, Fires, and Injuries

Nissan

331

Crash reports

41

Fire reports

268

Injury reports

Volvo

33

Crash reports

6

Fire reports

35

Injury reports

Every Nissan and Volvo Model Ranked

Nissan vs Volvo Reliability Trend by Year

Nissan's reliability is improving — recent model years average 82/100, up from earlier years. Volvo's reliability has been stable.

Model YearNissanVolvoEdge
202683/100(9)75/100(4)Nissan
202580/100(11)74/100(4)Nissan
202479/100(9)69/100(4)Nissan
202377/100(9)65/100(5)Nissan
202277/100(8)70/100(4)Nissan
202177/100(10)66/100(4)Nissan
202073/100(11)71/100(5)Nissan
201973/100(10)69/100(5)Nissan
201873/100(11)71/100(3)Nissan

Models tracked per year in parentheses.

Nissan vs Volvo: Head-to-Head Model Matchups

These are direct competitor models between Nissan and Volvo. Click any matchup for a detailed model-vs-model reliability comparison:

Who Should Buy Nissan vs Volvo?

If you want the lowest running costs, shop Nissan. The Frontier is the pick for a truck buyer, and the Altima and Rogue are solid good-standing choices for a sedan or SUV. An electric buyer should look at the Ariya, but target the 2024, which has far fewer complaints and no recalls. Skip the 2023, where owners report sudden loss of drive power. Be careful with the Leaf, especially the 2019 and 2020, which draw the most battery complaints. The 2021 is the better year.

If you want a luxury badge and can absorb higher repair bills, lean Volvo. The XC60 is the strongest of its lineup, and the 2021 is the year to find. Avoid the 2022, which draws the most complaints, including engines that shut off at a stop and will not restart. The XC40 is the weaker Volvo. If you want one, choose the 2020 and pass on the 2021 and 2023, which have electrical shutdowns and rearview camera dropouts.

The Bottom Line: Nissan or Volvo?

For most used-car shoppers, Nissan is the safer and cheaper bet. The Ariya ranks as the strongest model across both lineups, though only the 2024 is the one to buy. The Frontier is also excellent and avoids the Ariya's year problem. Nissan's lower upkeep adds up to about $1,540 saved over five years against Volvo. Pick Volvo only for the badge, and then stick to the XC60 2021.

Nissan vs Volvo: Common Questions

Is Nissan more reliable than Volvo?
Yes, Nissan has a clear edge. Both brands hold a good standing and have the same rate of complaints per car sold. Nissan pulls ahead on repair costs, recall impact, and how widely problems spread across systems. Nissan is also stronger in sedans and SUVs, and its recent trend is improving.
Which brand has more recalls, Nissan or Volvo?
Nissan has more, with 172 recalls against 141 for Volvo. Even so, the data rates Nissan stronger on recall impact. Raw counts do not tell the full story, so check the recall history of the exact model year before you buy.
Which is cheaper to repair, Nissan or Volvo?
Nissan is cheaper. Independent repair-cost data puts the average Nissan at about $523 a year, against $831 for Volvo. Over five years that is roughly $1,540 more for Volvo. The Leaf is the costly Nissan, while the cheapest Volvo still costs more than most Nissans.
What goes wrong most often on a used Volvo?
Electrical trouble leads, making up 35% of Volvo complaints. On the XC60, owners report the engine shutting off at a stop and refusing to restart, often after auto stop/start engages. XC40 owners report electrical shutdowns and a rearview camera that drops out in reverse.
Is a used Nissan Leaf a good buy?
It is a mixed buy. The Leaf has a good standing but sits below average among sedans. Owners describe sudden loss of drive power and a charge reading that collapses on the highway. The 2021 is the year to favor, while 2019 and 2020 draw the most complaints.

Comparing Nissan vs Volvo? Run a VIN check on any specific vehicle before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.

Look Up a VIN →

Related Make Comparisons

How we score Nissan and Volvo models

Scores weight complaint severity at 35%, repair costs at 30%, recall impact at 20%, and the spread of complaints across systems at 15%, with complaint counts adjusted for US sales. Read the full methodology.