Last updated: 2026-05-15

Mazda vs Rivian: Which Make Is More Reliable?

Comparing Mazda and Rivian on reliability? This page compares their scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs across every model we track.

Mazda currently leads with an average score of 73/100 compared to 62/100. Scroll down for the full breakdown.

Is Mazda More Reliable Than Rivian?

MetricMazdaRivian
Avg Reliability Score73/10062/100
Models Tracked62
Avg Recalls per Model1623
Avg Complaints per Model51984

Mazda Models

6 models ranked by reliability

377
576
Excellent Good Mixed Risky

Rivian Models

2 models ranked by reliability

R1t66
R1s58
Excellent Good Mixed Risky

Mazda vs Rivian: The Verdict

If reliability is your priority, Mazda makes a stronger case than Rivian by a wide margin. The overall picture: Mazda scores 73/100 across 6 models, while Rivian comes in at 62/100 across 2 models — all data-driven, no bias.

Where Mazda and Rivian Differ Most

Our reliability score is built from four weighted components. Here's how each make performs in each area:

ComponentWeightMazdaRivian
Complaint Severity

Owner complaints weighted by component severity

35%
67/100Good
65/100Good
Repair Costs

Annual maintenance and repair expenses

30%
71/100Good
50/100Mixed
Recall Impact

Safety recalls weighted by severity (park-it, park-outside)

20%
80/100Excellent
62/100Good
Issue Diversity

How many different systems have reported problems

15%
81/100Excellent
79/100Good

Dig into the components and repair costs stands out — Mazda outscores by 21 points there, which carries significant weight in the final number.

Mazda vs Rivian: Strengths and Weaknesses

Mazda

Strengths

  • Strong overall reliability (73/100 average)
  • Minimal recall impact — fewer safety-critical recalls
  • Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
  • Very affordable maintenance ($487/year avg)
  • 5 of 6 models rated Good or Excellent
  • Below-average repair frequency

Weaknesses

  • Above-average repair severity when issues occur

Rivian

Strengths

  • Above-average reliability (62/100 average)
  • Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas

Mazda vs Rivian Reliability by Vehicle Type

How the two makes compare within each vehicle category they both compete in:

CategoryMazdaRivianWinner
SUVs(4 vs 1 models)66/10058/100Mazda

Mazda wins 1 out of 1 shared categories.

Common Problems: Mazda vs Rivian

Top complaint categories from NHTSA owner reports, showing what drivers report most frequently for each make:

ComponentMazdaRivian
ENGINE26%665
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM16%41415%20
UNKNOWN OR OTHER12%32214%18
POWER TRAIN11%2876%8
SERVICE BRAKES6%1683%4
STEERING6%1488%10
AIR BAGS4%10132%42
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE4%1144%5
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL4%1005%6
SUSPENSION1%315%6

Percentage of total complaints. Raw complaint count shown below. Based on NHTSA owner reports across all tracked model years.

Mazda vs Rivian Complaint Severity: Crashes, Fires, and Injuries

Across all tracked models, Mazda owners reported 189 crash-related, 14 fire-related, and 116 injury-related complaints to NHTSA. Rivian owners reported 12 crash-related, 2 fire-related, and 2 injury-related complaints. Rivian has fewer severe incident reports overall. These counts reflect owner-reported incidents and don't establish causation — but they're a useful signal for comparing safety profiles.

Mazda

189

Crash reports

14

Fire reports

116

Injury reports

Rivian

12

Crash reports

2

Fire reports

2

Injury reports

Every Mazda and Rivian Model Ranked

All tracked models ranked by average reliability score. Click any model for detailed year-by-year data.

Mazda vs Rivian Reliability Trend by Year

Average reliability score for each model year, showing how quality has trended over time:

Mazda's reliability has been stable across the years we track.

Model YearMazdaRivianEdge
202572/100(6)61/100(2)Mazda
202469/100(6)65/100(2)Mazda
202374/100(5)61/100(2)Mazda
202279/100
202173/100
202075/100
201975/100
201874/100

Number in parentheses = models tracked for that year. Scores are averages across all tracked models.

The Bottom Line: Mazda or Rivian?

Mazda is the clear reliability pick here, and the data backs it up across most metrics.

If you want the single most reliable option: the Mazda CX-5 leads both lineups with a score of 81/100.

All scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data combined with independent repair cost databases. Check individual model pages for year-specific reliability data before making a final decision.

Mazda vs Rivian: Common Questions

Is Mazda more reliable than Rivian?
Based on our data, Mazda is more reliable overall with an average reliability score of 73/100 compared to 62/100. That's a meaningful difference worth weighing in your decision.
Which make has more recalls, Mazda or Rivian?
On a per-model average, Rivian has more recalls (~23 per model) compared to Mazda (~16 per model). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — many are minor or preventative.
What are the most reliable models from Mazda and Rivian?
The most reliable Mazda model is the CX-5 (avg score: 81/100), while the most reliable Rivian model is the R1t (avg score: 66/100).
What are the least reliable models from Mazda and Rivian?
The least reliable Mazda model is the CX-90 (avg score: 51/100), while the least reliable Rivian model is the R1s (avg score: 58/100). Check individual model pages for year-specific data before ruling these out.
What are the most common problems with Mazda and Rivian vehicles?
The most frequently reported issue for Mazda is engine (26% of complaints), while for Rivian it's air bags (32% of complaints). These are based on NHTSA owner complaint data across all tracked models.
How many Mazda and Rivian models does Auto Reliability Index track?
We track 6 Mazda models across 8 model years and 2 Rivian models across 3 model years. Scores are based on NHTSA recalls, owner complaints, and independent repair cost data.
Which make has fewer owner complaints, Mazda or Rivian?
On a per-model average, Rivian has fewer owner complaints (~84 per model) compared to Mazda (~519 per model). Note that models with higher sales naturally generate more complaints.
Which is better for a first-time car buyer, Mazda or Rivian?
For first-time buyers prioritizing reliability, Mazda has a slight edge with its higher average score. However, specific model choice matters more than make — check individual model pages for the best options in your budget and vehicle type.
Which make has fewer safety-related complaints, Mazda or Rivian?
Rivian has fewer owner-reported crashes, fires, and injuries in our database. Mazda has 189 crash reports, 14 fire reports, and 116 injury reports. Rivian has 12 crash, 2 fire, and 2 injury reports. Note that complaint volume correlates with sales volume.

Comparing Mazda vs Rivian? Run a VIN check on any specific vehicle before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.

Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.

Look Up a VIN →

Related Make Comparisons

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.