Last updated: 2026-03-04
GMC Terrain vs Mazda CX-5: Reliability Compared

GMC Terrain

Mazda CX-5
Choosing between the GMC Terrain and the Mazda CX-5? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two compact suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Mazda CX-5 currently leads with an average score of 81/100 compared to 72/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the GMC Terrain and Mazda CX-5 Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Mazda CX-5 is more reliable than the GMC Terrain, scoring 81/100 vs 72/100.
The Mazda CX-5 stands out with a higher average reliability score of 93/100 compared to the GMC Terrain's 76/100, indicating superior overall dependability. Despite a slightly higher owner complaint rate of 5.6 per 10,000 sold, the CX-5 benefits from a lower estimated annual repair cost of $447 versus the Terrain's $558. Additionally, the CX-5 has experienced fewer recalls, with 11 across nine years, compared to the Terrain's 19. These factors collectively suggest the Mazda CX-5 offers better reliability and lower ownership costs than the GMC Terrain.
Key Differences
- 1Mazda CX-5 costs $111 less per year to repair
- 2Mazda CX-5 scores 9 points higher in reliability
- 3Mazda CX-5 has 9% lower major repair risk
Category Scoreboard
GMC Terrain vs Mazda CX-5: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | GMC Terrain | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 72/100 | 81/100 |
| Years Tracked | 9 | 9 |
| Total Recalls | 19 | 11 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 4.8 | 5.6 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $558/yr | $447/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.3/yr | 0.3/yr |
| Major Repair Risk | 17% | 8% |
| Year Wins | 0 | 8 |
What Are the Common Problems With the GMC Terrain and Mazda CX-5?
The Mazda CX-5 and GMC Terrain exhibit distinct problem profiles, with the CX-5 showing a higher total number of complaints at 986 compared to the Terrain's 675. The CX-5 is notably affected by engine issues, accounting for 263 complaints, including one crash-linked, and has significant concerns in the electrical system and airbags, both of which have a high number of crash-linked incidents (7 and 11 respectively). In contrast, the GMC Terrain's most significant problem area is the service brakes, with 146 complaints, 8 of which are crash-linked, and the power train, with 135 complaints. While the CX-5 has a broader distribution of issues across different categories, the Terrain's complaints are more concentrated in specific areas, particularly in the power train and service brakes.
| Component | GMC Terrain | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| ENGINE | 0.4Very Low | 1.5Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 1Very Low | 0.6Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 1Very Low | 0.3Very Low |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 0.6Very Low | 0.7Very Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 0.5Very Low | 0.6Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | 0.1Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.1Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.2Very Low | —None |
| FUEL SYSTEM | 0.1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| STRUCTURE | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | —None | —None |
| ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC) | —None | —None |
| SEATS | —None | —None |
| LANE DEPARTURE | —None | —None |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING | —None | —None |
| SUSPENSION | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: GMC Terrain or Mazda CX-5?
How Does GMC Terrain vs Mazda CX-5 Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | GMC Terrain | Mazda CX-5 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 78/1000R / 8C | 82/1003R / 25C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2024 | 77/1001R / 29C | 84/1001R / 53C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2023 | 75/1002R / 21C | 81/1002R / 96C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2022 | 72/1004R / 65C | 87/1000R / 50C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2021 | 74/1002R / 28C | 83/1000R / 129C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2020 | 68/1002R / 160C | 86/1000R / 94C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2019 | 68/1003R / 163C | 75/1002R / 229C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2018 | 66/1005R / 201C | 71/1003R / 310C | Mazda CX-5 |
| 2026(predicted) | 77/100(predicted) | 73/100(predicted) | GMC Terrain |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 GMC Terrain scored 78/100 and the 2022 Mazda CX-5 scored 87/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the GMC Terrain vs the Mazda CX-5?
GMC Terrain vs Mazda CX-5: Common Questions
- Is the GMC Terrain more reliable than the Mazda CX-5?
- Based on our data, the Mazda CX-5 is more reliable with an average score of 81/100 compared to 72/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the GMC Terrain or the Mazda CX-5?
- The GMC Terrain has more recalls (19) compared to the Mazda CX-5 (11). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the GMC Terrain or the Mazda CX-5?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the GMC Terrain has a lower complaint rate at 4.8 per 10,000 sold versus 5.6 for the Mazda CX-5. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the GMC Terrain or the Mazda CX-5?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Mazda CX-5 is cheaper to maintain at $447/year versus $558/year for the GMC Terrain.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More GMC Terrain comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue