Last updated: 2026-03-28
Mazda 3 vs Mazda 5: Reliability Compared
Mazda 3
Mazda 5
Choosing between the Mazda 3 and the Mazda 5? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two compact sedans.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Mazda 3 currently leads with an average score of 77/100 compared to 76/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
Verdict
The Mazda 3 is more reliable than the Mazda 5, scoring 77/100 vs 76/100.
Key Differences
- 1Mazda 3 costs $148 less per year to repair
- 2Mazda 3 has 33 fewer total recalls
- 3Mazda 3 scores 1 points higher in reliability
Category Scoreboard
Mazda 3 vs Mazda 5: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Mazda 3 | Mazda 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 77/100 | 76/100 |
| Years Tracked | 8 | 9 |
| Total Recalls | 11 | 44 |
| Total ComplaintsRaw count — varies with sales volume | 217 | 1314 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $433/yr | $581/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.3/yr | 0.4/yr |
| Major Repair Risk | 10% | 10% |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2026 NHTSA | 2026 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 4 (1 tied) | 2 (1 tied) |
What Are the Common Problems With the Mazda 3 and Mazda 5?
| Component | Mazda 3 | Mazda 5 |
|---|---|---|
| ENGINE | 42 | 299 |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 32 | 178 |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 21 | 161 |
| POWER TRAIN | 7 | 141 |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 12 | 69 |
| AIR BAGS | 10 | 50 |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 8 | 45 |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 7 | 37 |
| STEERING | 12 | 28 |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | 12 | 19 |
| FUEL SYSTEM | 2 | 22 |
| STRUCTURE | — | 24 |
| SUSPENSION | 2 | 12 |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | — | 14 |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 2 | 9 |
| SEATS | — | 4 |
| LANE DEPARTURE | 3 | — |
| WHEELS | 2 | — |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | 2 | — |
Raw complaint counts aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports. Counts vary with sales volume.
How Does Mazda 3 vs Mazda 5 Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Mazda 3 | Mazda 5 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 79/1001R / 20C | 75/1005R / 42C | Mazda 3 |
| 2024 | 78/1002R / 22C | 75/1005R / 70C | Mazda 3 |
| 2023 | 78/1001R / 19C | 78/1003R / 68C | Tie |
| 2022 | 78/1001R / 26C | 83/1001R / 79C | Mazda 5 |
| 2021 | 70/1003R / 95C | 78/1003R / 180C | Mazda 5 |
| 2019 | 78/1002R / 26C | 72/10012R / 325C | Mazda 3 |
| 2018 | 79/1001R / 9C | 72/10010R / 423C | Mazda 3 |
| 2026(predicted) | 78/100(predicted) | 76/100(predicted) | Mazda 3 |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 Mazda 3 scored 79/100 and the 2022 Mazda 5 scored 83/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Mazda 3 vs Mazda 5: Common Questions
- Is the Mazda 3 more reliable than the Mazda 5?
- Based on our data, the Mazda 3 is more reliable with an average score of 77/100 compared to 76/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the Mazda 3 or the Mazda 5?
- The Mazda 5 has more recalls (44) compared to the Mazda 3 (11). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Mazda 3 or the Mazda 5?
- The Mazda 3 has fewer owner complaints (217) versus 1314 for the Mazda 5. Note that models with higher sales naturally generate more complaints.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the Mazda 3 or the Mazda 5?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Mazda 3 is cheaper to maintain at $433/year versus $581/year for the Mazda 5.
- Is the Mazda 3 or Mazda 5 safer?
- Both the Mazda 3 and Mazda 5 received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Mazda 3 comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue