Last updated: 2026-03-04

Kia Telluride vs Toyota Venza: Reliability Compared

Choosing between the Kia Telluride and the Toyota Venza? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.

Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Toyota Venza currently leads with an average score of 80/100 compared to 66/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.

How Do the Kia Telluride and Toyota Venza Generations Compare?

The Kia Telluride is currently in its first generation, which began in 2019 and is expected to continue until 2025. It received a significant refresh in 2023. Being relatively early in its life cycle, the Telluride may still be addressing initial platform-related issues, although its recent facelift suggests improvements and refinements have been made to enhance reliability. The Toyota Venza, on the other hand, is in its second generation, which started in 2021. It underwent a refresh in 2022 and a minor update in 2023. As it is midway through its generation, the Venza benefits from a more mature platform, which generally results in better reliability as early issues are often resolved. This stage in its lifecycle can offer buyers a more refined and dependable experience.

Verdict

The Toyota Venza is more reliable than the Kia Telluride, scoring 80/100 vs 66/100.

The Toyota Venza outperforms the Kia Telluride in terms of reliability, with an average reliability score of 91/100 compared to the Telluride's 71/100. The Venza has a significantly lower owner complaint rate of 0.2 per 10,000 sold, versus the Telluride's 23.3, and has faced only 5 recalls in 4 years, compared to 27 recalls for the Telluride over 6 years. Additionally, the Venza has lower estimated annual repair costs at $444 compared to the Telluride's $573. These data points suggest the Venza is a more reliable choice in the midsize SUV segment.

Key Differences

  1. 1Toyota Venza costs $129 less per year to repair
  2. 2Toyota Venza has 23.1 fewer complaints per 10k sold
  3. 3Toyota Venza has 22 fewer total recalls

Category Scoreboard

1Kia Telluride
4Toyota Venza
Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsComplaint RateAnnual Repair CostRepair FrequencySafety Rating

Kia Telluride vs Toyota Venza: Which Is More Reliable?

Kia Telluride vs Toyota Venza at-a-glance reliability comparison
MetricKia TellurideToyota Venza
Reliability Score66/10080/100
Years Tracked64
Total Recalls275
Complaints per 10k Sold23.30.2
Annual Repair Cost$573/yr$444/yr
Repair Frequency0.4/yr0.5/yr
Safety RatingNHTSA overall
2025 NHTSA
2024 NHTSA
Frontal
Side
Rollover
Year Wins04

What Are the Common Problems With the Kia Telluride and Toyota Venza?

The Kia Telluride demonstrates a broader range of problem categories with a total of 1600 complaints, notably in areas such as UNKNOWN OR OTHER, VISIBILITY/WIPER, and the ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, which collectively account for nearly half of all complaints. The Telluride also shows a significant number of crash-linked issues, particularly in the POWER TRAIN and SERVICE BRAKES categories, with five and six complaints respectively. In contrast, the Toyota Venza exhibits a minimal problem profile with only nine complaints, primarily concerning EXTERIOR LIGHTING and the FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM, and no crash-linked incidents reported. This indicates that the Venza has fewer reliability concerns, especially in critical safety-related systems, compared to the Telluride.

Kia Telluride vs Toyota Venza common problem areas comparison
ComponentKia TellurideToyota Venza
UNKNOWN OR OTHER4.4AverageNone
VISIBILITY/WIPER4.2AverageNone
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM2.8LowNone
EXTERIOR LIGHTING2.5LowNone
ENGINE1.9LowNone
POWER TRAIN1.7LowNone
STRUCTURE0.9Very LowNone
SERVICE BRAKES0.5Very LowNone
STEERING0.3Very LowNone
VISIBILITY0.3Very LowNone
SUSPENSION0.3Very LowNone
AIR BAGS0.2Very LowNone
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE0.2Very LowNone
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL0.2Very LowNone
SEAT BELTS0.1Very LowNone
SEATSNoneNone
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEMNoneNone

Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.

Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Kia Telluride or Toyota Venza?

The Kia Telluride has an annual repair cost of $573, slightly higher than the Toyota Venza's $444. This represents a $129 difference per year, accumulating to $645 over five years. While the Telluride has a lower repair frequency at 0.4 visits per year compared to the Venza's 0.5 visits, the Venza has a 10% risk of major repairs, which is not quantified for the Telluride. For cost-conscious buyers, the Venza offers a lower annual repair cost, though its higher repair frequency and potential for major repairs could offset these savings over time. Overall, the Telluride might offer better value by potentially reducing unexpected repair visits.

How Does Kia Telluride vs Toyota Venza Reliability Compare by Year?

Kia Telluride vs Toyota Venza year-by-year reliability scores
YearKia TellurideToyota VenzaEdge
202469/1004R / 180C80/1002R / 0CToyota Venza
202368/1005R / 161C80/1002R / 0CToyota Venza
202263/1006R / 280C80/1000R / 2CToyota Venza
202163/1004R / 280C79/1001R / 7CToyota Venza

Best years to cross-shop: The 2024 Kia Telluride scored 69/100 and the 2024 Toyota Venza scored 80/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.

Who Should Buy the Kia Telluride vs the Toyota Venza?

If you prioritize reliability and peace of mind, the Toyota Venza is the better choice. With a high reliability score of 91/100, only 5 total recalls, and just 0.2 owner complaints per 10,000 sold, the Venza stands out as a dependable option. The estimated annual repair cost is $444, making it more affordable to maintain. Although it has a 10% major repair risk, the overall low frequency of issues suggests it's still a solid option for those who value long-term reliability. On the other hand, if you are drawn to a model with a strong reputation but can tolerate a few more issues, the Kia Telluride might suit you. With a reliability score of 71/100 and 27 total recalls, it's less reliable than the Venza. However, it has a slightly lower repair frequency of 0.4 times per year. This might appeal to those who don't mind occasional maintenance and appreciate the Telluride's features and design.

Kia Telluride vs Toyota Venza: Common Questions

Is the Kia Telluride more reliable than the Toyota Venza?
Based on our data, the Toyota Venza is more reliable with an average score of 80/100 compared to 66/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
Which has more recalls, the Kia Telluride or the Toyota Venza?
The Kia Telluride has more recalls (27) compared to the Toyota Venza (5). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
Which has fewer owner complaints, the Kia Telluride or the Toyota Venza?
Adjusted for sales volume, the Toyota Venza has a lower complaint rate at 0.2 per 10,000 sold versus 23.3 for the Kia Telluride. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Kia Telluride or the Toyota Venza?
Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Toyota Venza is cheaper to maintain at $444/year versus $573/year for the Kia Telluride.
Is the Kia Telluride or Toyota Venza safer?
Both the Kia Telluride and Toyota Venza received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue