- Home
- Compare Makes
- Audi vs Mitsubishi
Last updated: 2026-07-26
Audi vs Mitsubishi: Which Make Is More Reliable?

Audi
10 models tracked

Mitsubishi
1 models tracked
Comparing Audi and Mitsubishi on reliability? This page compares their scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs across every model we track.
Mitsubishi currently leads with an average score of 76/100 compared to 68/100. Scroll down for the full breakdown.
Is Audi More Reliable Than Mitsubishi?
| Metric | Audi | Mitsubishi |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Reliability Score | 68/100 | 76/100 |
| Models Tracked | 10 | 1 |
| Avg Recalls per Model | 33 | 24 |
| Avg Complaints per Model | 168 | 398 |
| Avg Annual Repair Cost | $930/yr | $519/yr |
Audi vs Mitsubishi: The Verdict
Mitsubishi edges out Audi on reliability, though both makes have solid options. Across 10 Audi and 1 Mitsubishi models, Mitsubishi averages 76/100 to 68/100 — a 8-point gap built from NHTSA recalls, owner complaints, and independent repair cost data.
On the cost front, Mitsubishi is cheaper to maintain at $519/year versus $930/year. Over 5 years, that's roughly $2055 in savings. That maintenance gap adds up — budget-conscious buyers should factor in that Mitsubishi advantage.
Where Audi and Mitsubishi Differ Most
Our reliability score is built from four weighted components. Here's how each make performs in each area:
| Component | Weight | Audi | Mitsubishi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complaint Severity Owner complaints weighted by component severity | 35% | 65/100Good | 66/100Good |
| Repair Costs Annual maintenance and repair expenses | 30% | 58/100Mixed | 80/100Excellent |
| Recall Impact Safety recalls weighted by severity (park-it, park-outside) | 20% | 77/100Good | 80/100Excellent |
| Issue Diversity How many different systems have reported problems | 15% | 81/100Excellent | 83/100Excellent |
The biggest gap is in repair costs, where Mitsubishi scores 22 points higher. That single component does the most to separate these two makes.
Audi vs Mitsubishi: Strengths and Weaknesses
Audi
Strengths
- Above-average reliability (68/100 average)
- Minimal recall impact — fewer safety-critical recalls
- Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
- Reliability trending upward in recent model years
- 9 of 10 models rated Good or Excellent
- Below-average repair frequency
Weaknesses
- High maintenance costs ($930/year avg)
- Above-average repair severity when issues occur
Mitsubishi
Strengths
- Strong overall reliability (76/100 average)
- Minimal recall impact — fewer safety-critical recalls
- Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
- Reasonable maintenance costs ($519/year avg)
- Reliability trending upward in recent model years
- Below-average repair frequency
Weaknesses
- Above-average repair severity when issues occur
Which Make Is Cheaper to Maintain: Audi or Mitsubishi?
Based on independent repair cost data, Mitsubishi is cheaper to maintain at an average of $519/year compared to $930/year for Audi. That's a difference of $411/year, which adds up significantly over the life of the vehicle.
Audi Repair Cost Range
$739 – $1185/yr
Average: $930/yr
Audi vs Mitsubishi Reliability by Vehicle Type
How the two makes compare within each vehicle category they both compete in:
| Category | Audi | Mitsubishi | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUVs(7 vs 1 models) | 67/100 | 76/100 | Mitsubishi |
Mitsubishi wins 1 out of 1 shared categories.
Common Problems: Audi vs Mitsubishi
Top complaint categories from NHTSA owner reports, showing what drivers report most frequently for each make:
| Component | Audi | Mitsubishi |
|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 41%545 | 20%63 |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 12%164 | 12%39 |
| POWER TRAIN | 10%133 | 6%18 |
| ENGINE | 8%100 | 2%8 |
| STEERING | 6%74 | 5%16 |
| STRUCTURE | 0%5 | 24%78 |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 4%53 | 5%15 |
| SUSPENSION | 4%53 | 4%14 |
| AIR BAGS | 1%19 | 10%32 |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 3%40 | 3%10 |
Percentage of total complaints. Raw complaint count shown below. Based on NHTSA owner reports across all tracked model years.
Audi vs Mitsubishi Complaint Severity: Crashes, Fires, and Injuries
Across all tracked models, Audi owners reported 56 crash-related, 10 fire-related, and 42 injury-related complaints to NHTSA. Mitsubishi owners reported 33 crash-related, 1 fire-related, and 32 injury-related complaints. Mitsubishi has fewer severe incident reports overall. These counts reflect owner-reported incidents and don't establish causation — but they're a useful signal for comparing safety profiles.
Audi
56
Crash reports
10
Fire reports
42
Injury reports
Mitsubishi
33
Crash reports
1
Fire reports
32
Injury reports
Every Audi and Mitsubishi Model Ranked
All tracked models ranked by average reliability score. Click any model for detailed year-by-year data.
Audi Models
Mitsubishi Models
Audi vs Mitsubishi Reliability Trend by Year
Average reliability score for each model year, showing how quality has trended over time:
Audi's reliability is improving — recent model years average 74/100, up from earlier years. Mitsubishi's reliability is improving — recent model years average 81/100.
Both makes are trending improving in recent model years — neither is pulling away.
| Model Year | Audi | Mitsubishi | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 75/100 | — | — |
| 2025 | 72/100(10) | 82/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
| 2024 | 67/100(8) | 79/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
| 2023 | 68/100(8) | 77/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
| 2022 | 66/100(8) | 62/100(1) | Audi |
| 2021 | 65/100(7) | 84/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
| 2020 | 66/100(7) | 76/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
| 2019 | 63/100(6) | 74/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
| 2018 | 65/100(6) | 71/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
Number in parentheses = models tracked for that year. Scores are averages across all tracked models.
The Bottom Line: Audi or Mitsubishi?
The data favors Mitsubishi, but remember: the best model from the "losing" make often beats the worst model from the "winning" one.
If you want the single most reliable option: the Audi Q8-E-Tron leads both lineups with a score of 77/100.
Budget-conscious buyers should note that Mitsubishi costs less to maintain — $519/year vs $930/year. Over a typical 5-year ownership period, that adds up to roughly $2055 in savings.
All scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data combined with independent repair cost databases. Check individual model pages for year-specific reliability data before making a final decision.
Audi vs Mitsubishi: Common Questions
Is Audi more reliable than Mitsubishi?
Which is cheaper to maintain, Audi or Mitsubishi?
Which make has more recalls, Audi or Mitsubishi?
What are the most reliable models from Audi and Mitsubishi?
What are the most common problems with Audi and Mitsubishi vehicles?
How many Audi and Mitsubishi models does Auto Reliability Index track?
Which make has fewer owner complaints, Audi or Mitsubishi?
Are Audi and Mitsubishi getting more or less reliable?
Which is better for a first-time car buyer, Audi or Mitsubishi?
Which make has fewer safety-related complaints, Audi or Mitsubishi?
Comparing Audi vs Mitsubishi? Run a VIN check on any specific vehicle before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
Related Make Comparisons
More Audi comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.