Last updated: 2026-10-10

Mazda CX-90 vs Subaru Ascent: Reliability Compared

Choosing between the Mazda CX-90 and the Subaru Ascent? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.

Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Subaru Ascent currently leads with an average score of 69/100 compared to 58/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.

Verdict

The Subaru Ascent is more reliable than the Mazda CX-90, scoring 69/100 vs 58/100.

Key Differences

  1. 1Subaru Ascent has 102.0 fewer complaints per 10k sold
  2. 2Subaru Ascent scores 11 points higher in reliability
  3. 3Mazda CX-90 has 3 fewer total recalls

Category Scoreboard

1Mazda CX-90
—
2Subaru Ascent
Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsComplaint RateSafety Rating

Mazda CX-90 vs Subaru Ascent: Which Is More Reliable?

Mazda CX-90 vs Subaru Ascent at-a-glance reliability comparison
MetricMazda CX-90Subaru Ascent
Reliability Score58/10069/100
Years Tracked37
Total Recalls1316
Complaints per 10k Sold111.29.2
Safety RatingNHTSA overall
2026 NHTSA
2026 NHTSA
Frontal
Side
Rollover
Year Wins03

What Are the Common Problems With the Mazda CX-90 and Subaru Ascent?

Mazda CX-90 vs Subaru Ascent common problem areas comparison
ComponentMazda CX-90Subaru Ascent
STEERING31.8High—None
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM17.5High2.7Low
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE11.5Above Avg0.1Very Low
POWER TRAIN8.3Above Avg1.5Low
UNKNOWN OR OTHER8.7Above Avg1Very Low
ENGINE6.8Average0.3Very Low
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL6.4Average—None
VISIBILITY/WIPER4Average1.4Low
SERVICE BRAKES2.8Low0.5Very Low
STRUCTURE1.6Low0.2Very Low
VISIBILITY—None0.5Very Low
AIR BAGS—None0.2Very Low
SUSPENSION—None0.1Very Low
LANE DEPARTURE—None—None
TIRES—None—None
SEATS—None—None
WHEELS—None—None

Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.

How Does Mazda CX-90 vs Subaru Ascent Reliability Compare by Year?

Mazda CX-90 vs Subaru Ascent year-by-year reliability scores
YearMazda CX-90Subaru AscentEdge
202672/1000R / 0C76/1000R / 1CSubaru Ascent
202563/1002R / 21C76/1000R / 8CSubaru Ascent
202438/10011R / 259C76/1000R / 43CSubaru Ascent

Best years to cross-shop: The 2024 Mazda CX-90 scored 38/100 and the 2024 Subaru Ascent scored 76/100 — the strongest shared model years that have been on the road for at least two years, where available.

Mazda CX-90 vs Subaru Ascent: Common Questions

Is the Mazda CX-90 more reliable than the Subaru Ascent?
Based on our data, the Subaru Ascent is more reliable with an average score of 69/100 compared to 58/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
Which has more recalls, the Mazda CX-90 or the Subaru Ascent?
The Subaru Ascent has more recalls (16) compared to the Mazda CX-90 (13). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
Which has fewer owner complaints, the Mazda CX-90 or the Subaru Ascent?
Adjusted for sales volume, the Subaru Ascent has a lower complaint rate at 9.2 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 111.2 for the Mazda CX-90. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Is the Mazda CX-90 or Subaru Ascent safer?
Both the Mazda CX-90 and Subaru Ascent received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.

Decided between Mazda CX-90 and Subaru Ascent? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.

Look Up a VIN →

How we score the Mazda CX-90 and Subaru Ascent

Scores weight complaint severity at 35%, repair costs at 30%, recall impact at 20%, and the spread of complaints across systems at 15%, with complaint counts adjusted for US sales. Read the full methodology.

See incorrect data? Report an issue