Last updated: 2026-03-04
Honda CR-V vs Nissan Rogue: Reliability Compared

Honda CR-V

Nissan Rogue
Choosing between the Honda CR-V and the Nissan Rogue? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two compact suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. Both models currently share an average reliability score of 74/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Honda CR-V and Nissan Rogue Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Honda CR-V and Nissan Rogue are evenly matched with a reliability score of 74/100.
The Honda CR-V outshines the Nissan Rogue in terms of reliability with an average reliability score of 89/100 compared to the Rogue's 80/100. While both vehicles have similar recall numbers over nine years, the CR-V has a slightly higher complaint rate at 8 per 10,000 sold versus the Rogue's 6.2. However, the Honda CR-V offers a lower estimated annual repair cost at $407, compared to the Rogue's $467. Overall, the CR-V's higher reliability score and lower maintenance costs make it the more reliable choice.
Key Differences
- 1Honda CR-V costs $60 less per year to repair
- 2Nissan Rogue has 3 fewer total recalls
- 3Honda CR-V has 3% lower major repair risk
Category Scoreboard
Honda CR-V vs Nissan Rogue: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Honda CR-V | Nissan Rogue |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 74/100 | 74/100 |
| Years Tracked | 9 | 9 |
| Total Recalls | 46 | 43 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 8 | 6.2 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $407/yr | $467/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.3/yr | 0.3/yr |
| Major Repair Risk | 9% | 12% |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2026 NHTSA | 2026 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | Not rated | |
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 3 | 5 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Honda CR-V and Nissan Rogue?
The Honda CR-V has a notably high number of complaints related to steering with 1159 issues, 24 of which are crash-linked, indicating a potential area of concern for safety. In contrast, the Nissan Rogue shows a higher incidence of complaints in the "Unknown or Other" category with 360 complaints, but fewer of these are crash-linked. Both models have a significant number of issues with their electrical systems and engines, but the CR-V has a slightly higher count in electrical complaints, while the Rogue has more issues associated with the power train. Notably, the CR-V's service brakes have resulted in the highest number of crash-linked incidents at 33, highlighting a critical area where it diverges from the Rogue's profile.
| Component | Honda CR-V | Nissan Rogue |
|---|---|---|
| STEERING | 1.8Low | 0.2Very Low |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 0.9Very Low | 0.7Very Low |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 1Very Low | 0.5Very Low |
| ENGINE | 0.8Very Low | 0.7Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.4Very Low | 0.8Very Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 0.3Very Low | 0.9Very Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 0.2Very Low | 0.5Very Low |
| FUEL SYSTEM | 0.6Very Low | —None |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.3Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | 0.2Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.2Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING | —None | 0.3Very Low |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | 0.1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| LANE DEPARTURE | —None | —None |
| ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC) | —None | —None |
| STRUCTURE | —None | —None |
| SUSPENSION | —None | —None |
| VISIBILITY | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Honda CR-V or Nissan Rogue?
How Does Honda CR-V vs Nissan Rogue Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Honda CR-V | Nissan Rogue | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 80/1006R / 201C | 84/1001R / 103C | Nissan Rogue |
| 2024 | 77/1004R / 406C | 79/1002R / 116C | Nissan Rogue |
| 2023 | 72/1007R / 578C | 68/1005R / 519C | Honda CR-V |
| 2022 | 76/1005R / 242C | 70/1007R / 211C | Honda CR-V |
| 2021 | 77/1003R / 241C | 70/10013R / 269C | Honda CR-V |
| 2020 | 74/10010R / 358C | 79/1002R / 185C | Nissan Rogue |
| 2019 | 69/1007R / 996C | 73/1006R / 409C | Nissan Rogue |
| 2018 | 65/1004R / 1960C | 70/1006R / 718C | Nissan Rogue |
| 2026(predicted) | 76/100(predicted) | 77/100(predicted) | Nissan Rogue |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 Honda CR-V scored 80/100 and the 2025 Nissan Rogue scored 84/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Honda CR-V vs the Nissan Rogue?
Honda CR-V vs Nissan Rogue: Common Questions
- Is the Honda CR-V more reliable than the Nissan Rogue?
- They're very close — both average 74/100 in our reliability scoring. Other factors like repair costs and specific year models may tip the decision.
- Which has more recalls, the Honda CR-V or the Nissan Rogue?
- The Honda CR-V has more recalls (46) compared to the Nissan Rogue (43). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Honda CR-V or the Nissan Rogue?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Nissan Rogue has a lower complaint rate at 6.2 per 10,000 sold versus 8 for the Honda CR-V. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the Honda CR-V or the Nissan Rogue?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Honda CR-V is cheaper to maintain at $407/year versus $467/year for the Nissan Rogue.
- Is the Honda CR-V or Nissan Rogue safer?
- Both the Honda CR-V and Nissan Rogue received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Honda CR-V comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue