- Home
- Ford
- Expedition
- vs Toyota Sequoia
Last updated: 2026-07-26
Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia: Reliability Compared

Ford Expedition

Toyota Sequoia
Choosing between the Ford Expedition and the Toyota Sequoia? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two full-size suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Toyota Sequoia currently leads with an average score of 71/100 compared to 61/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Ford Expedition and Toyota Sequoia Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Toyota Sequoia is more reliable than the Ford Expedition, scoring 71/100 vs 61/100.
The Toyota Sequoia demonstrates superior reliability compared to the Ford Expedition, with a higher average reliability score of 71/100 versus the Expedition's 61/100. The Sequoia also has a significantly lower owner complaint rate of 3.1 per 10,000 sold, compared to the Expedition's 27.5. Additionally, the Sequoia's total recalls over five years stand at 17, far fewer than the Expedition's 84 over nine years, and its estimated annual repair costs are lower at $642 versus $861. These factors make the Sequoia a more reliable choice in the full-size SUV segment.
Key Differences
- 1Toyota Sequoia costs $219 less per year to repair
- 2Toyota Sequoia has 67 fewer total recalls
- 3Toyota Sequoia has 24.4 fewer complaints per 10k sold
Category Scoreboard
Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Ford Expedition | Toyota Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 61/100 | 71/100 |
| Years Tracked | 9 | 5 |
| Total Recalls | 84 | 17 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 27.5 | 3.1 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $861/yr | $642/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.2/yr | 0.4/yr |
| Major Repair Risk | 15% | 15% |
| Year Wins | 0 | 5 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Ford Expedition and Toyota Sequoia?
The Ford Expedition exhibits a higher complaint volume, with significant issues in the power train category, which accounts for 679 complaints and five crash-linked incidents, indicating a notable area of concern. Additionally, the Expedition has crash-linked complaints in the service brakes category, totaling seven, suggesting potential safety implications. In contrast, the Toyota Sequoia has a remarkably lower total complaint count, with the most frequent issues in the electrical system, but none of its complaints are linked to crashes. Overall, the Expedition's problem profile indicates more severe and safety-related concerns compared to the Sequoia.
| Component | Ford Expedition | Toyota Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| POWER TRAIN | 11.2Above Avg | 0.2Very Low |
| ENGINE | 2.7Low | —None |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 2.3Low | 0.4Very Low |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 1.9Low | 0.6Very Low |
| SEAT BELTS | 1.2Low | —None |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING | 1Very Low | —None |
| STRUCTURE | 0.7Very Low | —None |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.6Very Low | —None |
| AIR BAGS | 0.5Very Low | —None |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.5Very Low | —None |
| SUSPENSION | 0.4Very Low | —None |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | 0.4Very Low | —None |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.1Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.3Very Low | —None |
| VISIBILITY | 0.3Very Low | —None |
| SEATS | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| FUEL SYSTEM | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Ford Expedition or Toyota Sequoia?
How Does Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Ford Expedition | Toyota Sequoia | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 61/10012R / 106C | 72/1002R / 1C | Toyota Sequoia |
| 2021 | 57/10012R / 214C | 72/1002R / 4C | Toyota Sequoia |
| 2020 | 52/10016R / 370C | 72/1002R / 4C | Toyota Sequoia |
| 2019 | 53/10011R / 455C | 70/1006R / 7C | Toyota Sequoia |
| 2018 | 52/10012R / 358C | 69/1005R / 20C | Toyota Sequoia |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2022 Ford Expedition scored 61/100 and the 2022 Toyota Sequoia scored 72/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Ford Expedition vs the Toyota Sequoia?
Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia: Common Questions
- Is the Ford Expedition more reliable than the Toyota Sequoia?
- Based on our data, the Toyota Sequoia is more reliable with an average score of 71/100 compared to 61/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the Ford Expedition or the Toyota Sequoia?
- The Ford Expedition has more recalls (84) compared to the Toyota Sequoia (17). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Ford Expedition or the Toyota Sequoia?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Toyota Sequoia has a lower complaint rate at 3.1 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 27.5 for the Ford Expedition. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the Ford Expedition or the Toyota Sequoia?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Toyota Sequoia is cheaper to maintain at $642/year versus $861/year for the Ford Expedition.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Ford Expedition comparisons
Decided between Ford Expedition and Toyota Sequoia? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue