Last updated: 2026-07-26

Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia: Reliability Compared

Choosing between the Ford Expedition and the Toyota Sequoia? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two full-size suvs.

Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Toyota Sequoia currently leads with an average score of 71/100 compared to 61/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.

How Do the Ford Expedition and Toyota Sequoia Generations Compare?

As of 2026, the Ford Expedition is in its fifth generation, introduced in 2025. The Toyota Sequoia is in its third generation, which began in 2023. The Expedition's recent redesign suggests it is early in its generation cycle, which can sometimes mean potential first-year issues as new platforms are refined. In contrast, the Sequoia, now a few years into its current generation, may benefit from improved reliability as initial bugs are typically addressed. The Expedition's previous fourth generation (2018-2024) had time to mature, likely offering well-sorted reliability, whereas the Sequoia's second generation spanned a lengthy period (2008-2022), providing a stable and familiar platform.

Verdict

The Toyota Sequoia is more reliable than the Ford Expedition, scoring 71/100 vs 61/100.

The Toyota Sequoia demonstrates superior reliability compared to the Ford Expedition, with a higher average reliability score of 71/100 versus the Expedition's 61/100. The Sequoia also has a significantly lower owner complaint rate of 3.1 per 10,000 sold, compared to the Expedition's 27.5. Additionally, the Sequoia's total recalls over five years stand at 17, far fewer than the Expedition's 84 over nine years, and its estimated annual repair costs are lower at $642 versus $861. These factors make the Sequoia a more reliable choice in the full-size SUV segment.

Key Differences

  1. 1Toyota Sequoia costs $219 less per year to repair
  2. 2Toyota Sequoia has 67 fewer total recalls
  3. 3Toyota Sequoia has 24.4 fewer complaints per 10k sold

Category Scoreboard

1Ford Expedition
4Toyota Sequoia
Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsComplaint RateAnnual Repair CostRepair FrequencyMajor Repair Risk

Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia: Which Is More Reliable?

Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia at-a-glance reliability comparison
MetricFord ExpeditionToyota Sequoia
Reliability Score61/10071/100
Years Tracked95
Total Recalls8417
Complaints per 10k Sold27.53.1
Annual Repair Cost$861/yr$642/yr
Repair Frequency0.2/yr0.4/yr
Major Repair Risk15%15%
Year Wins05

What Are the Common Problems With the Ford Expedition and Toyota Sequoia?

The Ford Expedition exhibits a higher complaint volume, with significant issues in the power train category, which accounts for 679 complaints and five crash-linked incidents, indicating a notable area of concern. Additionally, the Expedition has crash-linked complaints in the service brakes category, totaling seven, suggesting potential safety implications. In contrast, the Toyota Sequoia has a remarkably lower total complaint count, with the most frequent issues in the electrical system, but none of its complaints are linked to crashes. Overall, the Expedition's problem profile indicates more severe and safety-related concerns compared to the Sequoia.

Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia common problem areas comparison
ComponentFord ExpeditionToyota Sequoia
POWER TRAIN11.2Above Avg0.2Very Low
ENGINE2.7LowNone
UNKNOWN OR OTHER2.3Low0.4Very Low
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM1.9Low0.6Very Low
SEAT BELTS1.2LowNone
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING1Very LowNone
STRUCTURE0.7Very LowNone
SERVICE BRAKES0.6Very LowNone
AIR BAGS0.5Very LowNone
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL0.5Very LowNone
SUSPENSION0.4Very LowNone
EXTERIOR LIGHTING0.4Very LowNone
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM0.1Very Low0.2Very Low
STEERING0.3Very LowNone
VISIBILITY0.3Very LowNone
SEATS0.1Very LowNone
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE0.1Very LowNone
FUEL SYSTEM0.1Very LowNone
VISIBILITY/WIPERNoneNone

Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.

Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Ford Expedition or Toyota Sequoia?

Based on independent repair cost data, the Toyota Sequoia presents a more cost-effective option for maintenance and repairs compared to the Ford Expedition, with an annual saving of $219. Over five years, this difference amounts to $1,095. While the Sequoia's repair frequency is higher at 0.4 visits per year compared to the Expedition's 0.2, both vehicles share the same major repair risk of 15%. For cost-conscious buyers, the Sequoia offers a lower annual repair cost, making it a better value despite the slightly more frequent visits to the repair shop.

How Does Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia Reliability Compare by Year?

Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia year-by-year reliability scores
YearFord ExpeditionToyota SequoiaEdge
202261/10012R / 106C72/1002R / 1CToyota Sequoia
202157/10012R / 214C72/1002R / 4CToyota Sequoia
202052/10016R / 370C72/1002R / 4CToyota Sequoia
201953/10011R / 455C70/1006R / 7CToyota Sequoia
201852/10012R / 358C69/1005R / 20CToyota Sequoia

Best years to cross-shop: The 2022 Ford Expedition scored 61/100 and the 2022 Toyota Sequoia scored 72/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.

Who Should Buy the Ford Expedition vs the Toyota Sequoia?

If you prioritize reliability and lower running costs, the Toyota Sequoia is a compelling choice. With a higher reliability score of 71/100, significantly fewer recalls (17), and a low owner complaint rate of just 3.1 per 10,000 sold, it promises peace of mind. The estimated annual repair cost is also lower at $642, although it has a slightly higher repair frequency of 0.4 times per year. For those who value dependability and want to minimize unexpected expenses, the Sequoia is the superior option. On the other hand, if you are drawn to the Ford Expedition, be aware of its lower reliability score of 61/100 and a higher number of recalls (84). It has more owner complaints, with 27.5 per 10,000 sold, and a higher estimated annual repair cost of $861. However, the repair frequency is lower at 0.2 times per year. This may appeal to those who prefer dealing with fewer repairs yearly, despite potentially higher costs and issues with major components like the power train and engine.

Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia: Common Questions

Is the Ford Expedition more reliable than the Toyota Sequoia?
Based on our data, the Toyota Sequoia is more reliable with an average score of 71/100 compared to 61/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
Which has more recalls, the Ford Expedition or the Toyota Sequoia?
The Ford Expedition has more recalls (84) compared to the Toyota Sequoia (17). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
Which has fewer owner complaints, the Ford Expedition or the Toyota Sequoia?
Adjusted for sales volume, the Toyota Sequoia has a lower complaint rate at 3.1 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 27.5 for the Ford Expedition. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Ford Expedition or the Toyota Sequoia?
Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Toyota Sequoia is cheaper to maintain at $642/year versus $861/year for the Ford Expedition.

Decided between Ford Expedition and Toyota Sequoia? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.

Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.

Look Up a VIN →

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue