Last updated: 2026-07-26
Mitsubishi vs Volvo: Which Make Is More Reliable?
Mitsubishi
1 models tracked
Volvo
5 models tracked
Comparing Mitsubishi and Volvo on reliability? This page compares their scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs across every model we track.
Mitsubishi currently leads with an average score of 76/100 compared to 70/100. Scroll down for the full breakdown.
Is Mitsubishi More Reliable Than Volvo?
| Metric | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Reliability Score | 76/100 | 70/100 |
| Models Tracked | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Recalls per Model | 24 | 28 |
| Avg Complaints per Model | 398 | 136 |
| Avg Annual Repair Cost | $519/yr | $831/yr |
Mitsubishi vs Volvo: The Verdict
The numbers favor Mitsubishi here, but Volvo isn't far behind. We scored 6 models between the two makes: Mitsubishi at 76/100 and Volvo at 70/100, based on recalls, complaint severity, repair costs, and issue diversity.
On the cost front, Mitsubishi is cheaper to maintain at $519/year versus $831/year. Over 5 years, that's roughly $1560 in savings. For buyers watching long-term costs, Mitsubishi's lower maintenance bill is a real differentiator.
Where Mitsubishi and Volvo Differ Most
Our reliability score is built from four weighted components. Here's how each make performs in each area:
| Component | Weight | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complaint Severity Owner complaints weighted by component severity | 35% | 66/100Good | 67/100Good |
| Repair Costs Annual maintenance and repair expenses | 30% | 80/100Excellent | 66/100Good |
| Recall Impact Safety recalls weighted by severity (park-it, park-outside) | 20% | 80/100Excellent | 73/100Good |
| Issue Diversity How many different systems have reported problems | 15% | 83/100Excellent | 80/100Excellent |
Mitsubishi's advantage in repair costs (+14 points) is the main driver of the overall score difference between these makes.
Mitsubishi vs Volvo: Strengths and Weaknesses
Mitsubishi
Strengths
- Strong overall reliability (76/100 average)
- Minimal recall impact — fewer safety-critical recalls
- Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
- Reasonable maintenance costs ($519/year avg)
- Reliability trending upward in recent model years
- Below-average repair frequency
Weaknesses
- Above-average repair severity when issues occur
Volvo
Strengths
- Strong overall reliability (70/100 average)
- Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
- 5 of 5 models rated Good or Excellent
- Below-average repair frequency
Weaknesses
- High maintenance costs ($831/year avg)
- Above-average repair severity when issues occur
Which Make Is Cheaper to Maintain: Mitsubishi or Volvo?
Based on independent repair cost data, Mitsubishi is cheaper to maintain at an average of $519/year compared to $831/year for Volvo. That's a difference of $312/year, which adds up significantly over the life of the vehicle.
Volvo Repair Cost Range
$746 – $976/yr
Average: $831/yr
Mitsubishi vs Volvo Reliability by Vehicle Type
How the two makes compare within each vehicle category they both compete in:
| Category | Mitsubishi | Volvo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUVs(1 vs 3 models) | 76/100 | 69/100 | Mitsubishi |
Mitsubishi wins 1 out of 1 shared categories.
Common Problems: Mitsubishi vs Volvo
Top complaint categories from NHTSA owner reports, showing what drivers report most frequently for each make:
| Component | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 20%63 | 35%180 |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 12%39 | 13%70 |
| STRUCTURE | 24%78 | 3%18 |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 5%15 | 12%62 |
| POWER TRAIN | 6%18 | 5%26 |
| STEERING | 5%16 | 5%28 |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | 1%4 | 7%39 |
| AIR BAGS | 10%32 | 1%4 |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | — | 4%21 |
| SUSPENSION | 4%14 | 0%2 |
Percentage of total complaints. Raw complaint count shown below. Based on NHTSA owner reports across all tracked model years.
Mitsubishi vs Volvo Complaint Severity: Crashes, Fires, and Injuries
Across all tracked models, Mitsubishi owners reported 33 crash-related, 1 fire-related, and 32 injury-related complaints to NHTSA. Volvo owners reported 33 crash-related, 6 fire-related, and 35 injury-related complaints. Mitsubishi has fewer severe incident reports overall. These counts reflect owner-reported incidents and don't establish causation — but they're a useful signal for comparing safety profiles.
Mitsubishi
33
Crash reports
1
Fire reports
32
Injury reports
Volvo
33
Crash reports
6
Fire reports
35
Injury reports
Every Mitsubishi and Volvo Model Ranked
All tracked models ranked by average reliability score. Click any model for detailed year-by-year data.
Mitsubishi vs Volvo Reliability Trend by Year
Average reliability score for each model year, showing how quality has trended over time:
Mitsubishi's reliability is improving — recent model years average 81/100, up from earlier years. Volvo's reliability has been stable.
| Model Year | Mitsubishi | Volvo | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | — | 75/100 | — |
| 2025 | 82/100(1) | 74/100(4) | Mitsubishi |
| 2024 | 79/100(1) | 69/100(4) | Mitsubishi |
| 2023 | 77/100(1) | 65/100(5) | Mitsubishi |
| 2022 | 62/100(1) | 70/100(4) | Volvo |
| 2021 | 84/100(1) | 66/100(4) | Mitsubishi |
| 2020 | 76/100(1) | 71/100(5) | Mitsubishi |
| 2019 | 74/100(1) | 69/100(5) | Mitsubishi |
| 2018 | 71/100(1) | 71/100(3) | Tie |
Number in parentheses = models tracked for that year. Scores are averages across all tracked models.
The Bottom Line: Mitsubishi or Volvo?
Mitsubishi comes out ahead on the numbers, though both makes can serve you well if you pick the right model.
If you want the single most reliable option: the Mitsubishi Outlander leads both lineups with a score of 76/100.
Budget-conscious buyers should note that Mitsubishi costs less to maintain — $519/year vs $831/year. Over a typical 5-year ownership period, that adds up to roughly $1560 in savings.
All scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data combined with independent repair cost databases. Check individual model pages for year-specific reliability data before making a final decision.
Mitsubishi vs Volvo: Common Questions
Is Mitsubishi more reliable than Volvo?
Which is cheaper to maintain, Mitsubishi or Volvo?
Which make has more recalls, Mitsubishi or Volvo?
What are the most reliable models from Mitsubishi and Volvo?
What are the most common problems with Mitsubishi and Volvo vehicles?
How many Mitsubishi and Volvo models does Auto Reliability Index track?
Which make has fewer owner complaints, Mitsubishi or Volvo?
Are Mitsubishi and Volvo getting more or less reliable?
Which is better for a first-time car buyer, Mitsubishi or Volvo?
Which make has fewer safety-related complaints, Mitsubishi or Volvo?
Comparing Mitsubishi vs Volvo? Run a VIN check on any specific vehicle before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
Related Make Comparisons
More Mitsubishi comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.