Last updated: 2026-07-26
Chrysler vs Mitsubishi: Which Make Is More Reliable?
Chrysler
3 models tracked
Mitsubishi
1 models tracked
Comparing Chrysler and Mitsubishi on reliability? This page compares their scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs across every model we track.
Mitsubishi currently leads with an average score of 76/100 compared to 70/100. Scroll down for the full breakdown.
Is Chrysler More Reliable Than Mitsubishi?
| Metric | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Reliability Score | 70/100 | 76/100 |
| Models Tracked | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Recalls per Model | 33 | 24 |
| Avg Complaints per Model | 888 | 398 |
| Avg Annual Repair Cost | $642/yr | $519/yr |
Chrysler vs Mitsubishi: The Verdict
Between these two, Mitsubishi comes out ahead on reliability, though specific model choice matters more than the overall gap. Aggregating recall data, owner complaints, and repair costs across every model we track, Chrysler averages 70/100 (3 models) and Mitsubishi averages 76/100 (1 models).
On the cost front, Mitsubishi is cheaper to maintain at $519/year versus $642/year. Over 5 years, that's roughly $615 in savings. Worth noting: repair costs vary heavily by model within each make, so this is an average — check individual model pages for specifics.
Where Chrysler and Mitsubishi Differ Most
Our reliability score is built from four weighted components. Here's how each make performs in each area:
| Component | Weight | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complaint Severity Owner complaints weighted by component severity | 35% | 59/100Mixed | 66/100Good |
| Repair Costs Annual maintenance and repair expenses | 30% | 70/100Good | 80/100Excellent |
| Recall Impact Safety recalls weighted by severity (park-it, park-outside) | 20% | 73/100Good | 80/100Excellent |
| Issue Diversity How many different systems have reported problems | 15% | 81/100Excellent | 83/100Excellent |
Where they diverge most: repair costs. Mitsubishi has a 10-point edge in that component, which accounts for much of the reliability gap.
Chrysler vs Mitsubishi: Strengths and Weaknesses
Chrysler
Strengths
- Strong overall reliability (70/100 average)
- Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
- Reasonable maintenance costs ($642/year avg)
- Reliability trending upward in recent model years
- 3 of 3 models rated Good or Excellent
- Below-average repair frequency
Weaknesses
- 32 fire-related complaints across lineup
- Above-average repair severity when issues occur
Mitsubishi
Strengths
- Strong overall reliability (76/100 average)
- Minimal recall impact — fewer safety-critical recalls
- Focused issue profile — problems concentrated in fewer areas
- Reasonable maintenance costs ($519/year avg)
- Reliability trending upward in recent model years
- Below-average repair frequency
Weaknesses
- Above-average repair severity when issues occur
Which Make Is Cheaper to Maintain: Chrysler or Mitsubishi?
Based on independent repair cost data, Mitsubishi is cheaper to maintain at an average of $519/year compared to $642/year for Chrysler. That's a difference of $123/year, which adds up significantly over the life of the vehicle.
Chrysler Repair Cost Range
$631 – $647/yr
Average: $642/yr
Common Problems: Chrysler vs Mitsubishi
Top complaint categories from NHTSA owner reports, showing what drivers report most frequently for each make:
| Component | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
|---|---|---|
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 28%648 | 20%63 |
| POWER TRAIN | 26%597 | 6%18 |
| ENGINE | 14%316 | 2%8 |
| STEERING | 10%226 | 5%16 |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 7%154 | 12%39 |
| AIR BAGS | 4%96 | 10%32 |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 3%78 | 5%15 |
| STRUCTURE | 1%13 | 24%78 |
| HYBRID PROPULSION SYSTEM | 2%57 | — |
| SUSPENSION | 0%11 | 4%14 |
Percentage of total complaints. Raw complaint count shown below. Based on NHTSA owner reports across all tracked model years.
Chrysler vs Mitsubishi Complaint Severity: Crashes, Fires, and Injuries
Across all tracked models, Chrysler owners reported 78 crash-related, 32 fire-related, and 55 injury-related complaints to NHTSA. Mitsubishi owners reported 33 crash-related, 1 fire-related, and 32 injury-related complaints. Mitsubishi has fewer severe incident reports overall. These counts reflect owner-reported incidents and don't establish causation — but they're a useful signal for comparing safety profiles.
Chrysler
78
Crash reports
32
Fire reports
55
Injury reports
Mitsubishi
33
Crash reports
1
Fire reports
32
Injury reports
Every Chrysler and Mitsubishi Model Ranked
All tracked models ranked by average reliability score. Click any model for detailed year-by-year data.
Chrysler vs Mitsubishi Reliability Trend by Year
Average reliability score for each model year, showing how quality has trended over time:
Chrysler's reliability is improving — recent model years average 78/100, up from earlier years. Mitsubishi's reliability is improving — recent model years average 81/100.
Interestingly, both Chrysler and Mitsubishi show improving reliability trends recently.
| Model Year | Chrysler | Mitsubishi | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 82/100 | — | — |
| 2025 | 73/100(2) | 82/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
| 2024 | 73/100(2) | 79/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
| 2023 | 69/100(3) | 77/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
| 2022 | 68/100(3) | 62/100(1) | Chrysler |
| 2021 | 68/100(3) | 84/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
| 2020 | 72/100(3) | 76/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
| 2019 | 66/100(2) | 74/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
| 2018 | 59/100(2) | 71/100(1) | Mitsubishi |
Number in parentheses = models tracked for that year. Scores are averages across all tracked models.
The Bottom Line: Chrysler or Mitsubishi?
The data favors Mitsubishi, but remember: the best model from the "losing" make often beats the worst model from the "winning" one.
If you want the single most reliable option: the Mitsubishi Outlander leads both lineups with a score of 76/100.
Budget-conscious buyers should note that Mitsubishi costs less to maintain — $519/year vs $642/year.
All scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data combined with independent repair cost databases. Check individual model pages for year-specific reliability data before making a final decision.
Chrysler vs Mitsubishi: Common Questions
Is Chrysler more reliable than Mitsubishi?
Which is cheaper to maintain, Chrysler or Mitsubishi?
Which make has more recalls, Chrysler or Mitsubishi?
What are the most reliable models from Chrysler and Mitsubishi?
What are the most common problems with Chrysler and Mitsubishi vehicles?
How many Chrysler and Mitsubishi models does Auto Reliability Index track?
Which make has fewer owner complaints, Chrysler or Mitsubishi?
Are Chrysler and Mitsubishi getting more or less reliable?
Which is better for a first-time car buyer, Chrysler or Mitsubishi?
Which make has fewer safety-related complaints, Chrysler or Mitsubishi?
Comparing Chrysler vs Mitsubishi? Run a VIN check on any specific vehicle before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
Related Make Comparisons
More Chrysler comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.