Last updated: 2026-03-04
GMC Terrain vs Subaru Forester: Reliability Compared

GMC Terrain

Subaru Forester
Choosing between the GMC Terrain and the Subaru Forester? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two compact suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Subaru Forester currently leads with an average score of 74/100 compared to 72/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the GMC Terrain and Subaru Forester Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Subaru Forester is more reliable than the GMC Terrain, scoring 74/100 vs 72/100.
The Subaru Forester and GMC Terrain exhibit similar reliability scores, with the Forester slightly ahead at 77/100 compared to the Terrain's 76/100. However, the Forester has a higher owner complaint rate at 8.7 per 10,000 sold versus the Terrain's 4.8, suggesting more frequent issues reported by Forester owners. The Terrain also benefits from a lower estimated annual repair cost of $558 compared to the Forester's $632. While both vehicles have common issues in the electrical system and engine areas, the Forester's higher recall count and complaint rate may tip the scale in favor of the Terrain for potential buyers prioritizing fewer reported issues and lower maintenance expenses.
Key Differences
- 1GMC Terrain costs $74 less per year to repair
- 2Subaru Forester has 6 fewer total recalls
- 3Subaru Forester has 4% lower major repair risk
Category Scoreboard
GMC Terrain vs Subaru Forester: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | GMC Terrain | Subaru Forester |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 72/100 | 74/100 |
| Years Tracked | 9 | 9 |
| Total Recalls | 19 | 13 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 4.8 | 8.7 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $558/yr | $632/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.3/yr | 0.4/yr |
| Major Repair Risk | 17% | 13% |
| Year Wins | 1 (1 tied) | 6 (1 tied) |
What Are the Common Problems With the GMC Terrain and Subaru Forester?
The Subaru Forester and GMC Terrain exhibit distinct problem profiles, with the Forester experiencing a significantly higher number of complaints, particularly in the visibility/wiper category with 819 incidents. In contrast, the GMC Terrain's most frequent issue lies with the service brakes, accumulating 146 complaints. Notably, the Forester shows a higher incidence of crash-linked issues, especially in vehicle speed control with 26 complaints tied to crashes, whereas the Terrain's highest crash-linked category is service brakes with 8 incidents. Additionally, the Forester's electrical system complaints are more severe, with 8 crash-linked cases, compared to just 1 for the Terrain.
| Component | GMC Terrain | Subaru Forester |
|---|---|---|
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | —None | 3.1Average |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 0.6Very Low | 1.2Low |
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 0.5Very Low | 1.2Low |
| POWER TRAIN | 1Very Low | 0.4Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| ENGINE | 0.4Very Low | 0.4Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | 0.1Very Low | 0.5Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.1Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.1Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.2Very Low | —None |
| VISIBILITY | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| FUEL SYSTEM | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | —None | —None |
| ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC) | —None | —None |
| SEATS | —None | —None |
| LANE DEPARTURE | —None | —None |
| ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING | —None | —None |
| SUSPENSION | —None | —None |
| EXTERIOR LIGHTING | —None | —None |
| STRUCTURE | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: GMC Terrain or Subaru Forester?
How Does GMC Terrain vs Subaru Forester Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | GMC Terrain | Subaru Forester | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 78/1000R / 8C | 79/1002R / 48C | Subaru Forester |
| 2024 | 77/1001R / 29C | 78/1002R / 26C | Subaru Forester |
| 2023 | 75/1002R / 21C | 79/1001R / 61C | Subaru Forester |
| 2022 | 72/1004R / 65C | 77/1001R / 86C | Subaru Forester |
| 2021 | 74/1002R / 28C | 76/1000R / 196C | Subaru Forester |
| 2020 | 68/1002R / 160C | 71/1000R / 584C | Subaru Forester |
| 2019 | 68/1003R / 163C | 63/1003R / 825C | GMC Terrain |
| 2018 | 66/1005R / 201C | 66/1003R / 475C | Tie |
| 2026(predicted) | 77/100(predicted) | 79/100(predicted) | Subaru Forester |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 GMC Terrain scored 78/100 and the 2025 Subaru Forester scored 79/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the GMC Terrain vs the Subaru Forester?
GMC Terrain vs Subaru Forester: Common Questions
- Is the GMC Terrain more reliable than the Subaru Forester?
- Based on our data, the Subaru Forester is more reliable with an average score of 74/100 compared to 72/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the GMC Terrain or the Subaru Forester?
- The GMC Terrain has more recalls (19) compared to the Subaru Forester (13). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the GMC Terrain or the Subaru Forester?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the GMC Terrain has a lower complaint rate at 4.8 per 10,000 sold versus 8.7 for the Subaru Forester. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the GMC Terrain or the Subaru Forester?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the GMC Terrain is cheaper to maintain at $558/year versus $632/year for the Subaru Forester.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More GMC Terrain comparisons
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue