Last updated: 2026-03-04

Mazda CX-5 vs Volkswagen Tiguan: Reliability Compared

Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tiguan? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two compact suvs.

Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Mazda CX-5 currently leads with an average score of 81/100 compared to 68/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.

How Do the Mazda CX-5 and Volkswagen Tiguan Generations Compare?

The Mazda CX-5 is currently in its second generation (KF; 2016), which was last redesigned in 2017 and received a significant facelift in 2022. This positions the CX-5 as a mature platform, suggesting that many early production issues have likely been addressed, enhancing reliability. In contrast, the Volkswagen Tiguan is transitioning into its third generation (CT1; 2024) after a second generation that was introduced in 2018 and refreshed in 2021. As the Tiguan enters a new generation, it may face the typical first-year challenges that come with new platforms. Buyers seeking reliability might find the CX-5's established design more reassuring.

Verdict

The Mazda CX-5 is more reliable than the Volkswagen Tiguan, scoring 81/100 vs 68/100.

The Mazda CX-5 stands out as a more reliable choice compared to the Volkswagen Tiguan, with an impressive average reliability score of 93/100 versus the Tiguan's 68/100. The CX-5 also benefits from lower owner complaints at 5.6 per 10,000 sold, compared to the Tiguan's 9.3 per 10,000. Additionally, the CX-5 incurs lower estimated annual repair costs at $447, significantly less than the Tiguan's $730. With fewer recalls (11 over nine years versus the Tiguan's 35), the Mazda CX-5 clearly demonstrates superior reliability in the compact SUV segment.

Key Differences

  1. 1Mazda CX-5 costs $283 less per year to repair
  2. 2Mazda CX-5 has 24 fewer total recalls
  3. 3Mazda CX-5 scores 13 points higher in reliability

Category Scoreboard

6Mazda CX-5
0Volkswagen Tiguan
Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsComplaint RateAnnual Repair CostRepair FrequencyMajor Repair RiskSafety Rating

Mazda CX-5 vs Volkswagen Tiguan: Which Is More Reliable?

Mazda CX-5 vs Volkswagen Tiguan at-a-glance reliability comparison
MetricMazda CX-5Volkswagen Tiguan
Reliability Score81/10068/100
Years Tracked99
Total Recalls1135
Complaints per 10k Sold5.69.3
Annual Repair Cost$447/yr$730/yr
Repair Frequency0.3/yr0.9/yr
Major Repair Risk8%12%
Safety RatingNHTSA overall
2026 NHTSA
2026 NHTSA
Frontal
Side
Rollover
Year Wins80

What Are the Common Problems With the Mazda CX-5 and Volkswagen Tiguan?

The Mazda CX-5 and Volkswagen Tiguan both exhibit issues with their electrical systems and engines, with the CX-5 having more complaints related to the engine at 263 compared to the Tiguan's 128. Notably, the CX-5 has a higher number of crash-linked complaints in areas such as air bags and vehicle speed control, with 11 complaints each, suggesting potential safety concerns. Conversely, the Tiguan shows a significant number of complaints in the electrical system at 176, though with fewer crash-linked incidents. Additionally, the Tiguan experiences more issues with the power train than the CX-5, but neither model shows crash-linked problems in this category.

Mazda CX-5 vs Volkswagen Tiguan common problem areas comparison
ComponentMazda CX-5Volkswagen Tiguan
ENGINE1.5Low1.2Low
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM0.7Very Low1.7Low
POWER TRAIN0.6Very Low1.2Low
UNKNOWN OR OTHER0.6Very Low1Very Low
SERVICE BRAKES0.3Very Low0.4Very Low
STRUCTURE0.2Very Low0.4Very Low
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL0.2Very Low0.2Very Low
AIR BAGS0.2Very Low0.2Very Low
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE0.1Very Low0.3Very Low
STEERING0.1Very Low0.3Very Low
VISIBILITY/WIPER0.1Very Low0.2Very Low
EXTERIOR LIGHTING0.1Very Low0.1Very Low
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEMNone0.2Very Low
FUEL SYSTEM0.1Very LowNone
SEAT BELTSNone0.1Very Low
SUSPENSIONNoneNone
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLINGNoneNone
SEATSNoneNone
WHEELSNoneNone
LANE DEPARTURENoneNone
BACK OVER PREVENTIONNoneNone

Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.

Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Mazda CX-5 or Volkswagen Tiguan?

Based on independent repair cost data, the Mazda CX-5 is a more cost-effective choice for budget-conscious drivers. With an annual repair cost of $447, it saves approximately $283 each year compared to the $730 required for the Volkswagen Tiguan, amounting to a $1,415 difference over five years. The CX-5 also boasts a lower repair frequency of 0.3 visits per year versus the Tiguan's 0.9 visits, which means fewer disruptions and potential savings on repair-related downtime. Additionally, the Mazda has a lower major repair risk at 8%, compared to the Tiguan's 12%, further solidifying its reputation as a reliable and economical option.

How Does Mazda CX-5 vs Volkswagen Tiguan Reliability Compare by Year?

Mazda CX-5 vs Volkswagen Tiguan year-by-year reliability scores
YearMazda CX-5Volkswagen TiguanEdge
202582/1003R / 25C73/1002R / 18CMazda CX-5
202484/1001R / 53C75/1001R / 38CMazda CX-5
202381/1002R / 96C73/1001R / 49CMazda CX-5
202287/1000R / 50C61/1005R / 199CMazda CX-5
202183/1000R / 129C67/1005R / 106CMazda CX-5
202086/1000R / 94C69/1003R / 118CMazda CX-5
201975/1002R / 229C65/1005R / 165CMazda CX-5
201871/1003R / 310C57/10013R / 275CMazda CX-5
2026(predicted)73/100(predicted)74/100(predicted)Volkswagen Tiguan

Best years to cross-shop: The 2022 Mazda CX-5 scored 87/100 and the 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan scored 75/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.

Who Should Buy the Mazda CX-5 vs the Volkswagen Tiguan?

If you prioritize low running costs and reliability, the Mazda CX-5 is an excellent choice. With a high reliability score of 93/100 and an estimated annual repair cost of just $447, it is designed to keep you on the road with minimal hassle. The CX-5's repair frequency is low at 0.3 times per year, and it carries a lower major repair risk of 8%. Despite having 11 recalls, the owner complaints are minimal at 5.6 per 10,000 sold, indicating a generally satisfied ownership experience. On the other hand, if you are drawn to the Volkswagen Tiguan, be prepared for higher maintenance demands. With a reliability score of 68/100 and an annual repair cost estimate of $730, owning a Tiguan may require more frequent visits to the mechanic, as evidenced by its 0.9 repair frequency per year and a 12% major repair risk. The Tiguan has faced 35 recalls and has a higher rate of owner complaints, which might suggest ongoing issues. Choose the Tiguan if you value its specific features or design, but bear in mind the potential for higher upkeep.

Mazda CX-5 vs Volkswagen Tiguan: Common Questions

Is the Mazda CX-5 more reliable than the Volkswagen Tiguan?
Based on our data, the Mazda CX-5 is more reliable with an average score of 81/100 compared to 68/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
Which has more recalls, the Mazda CX-5 or the Volkswagen Tiguan?
The Volkswagen Tiguan has more recalls (35) compared to the Mazda CX-5 (11). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
Which has fewer owner complaints, the Mazda CX-5 or the Volkswagen Tiguan?
Adjusted for sales volume, the Mazda CX-5 has a lower complaint rate at 5.6 per 10,000 sold versus 9.3 for the Volkswagen Tiguan. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Mazda CX-5 or the Volkswagen Tiguan?
Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Mazda CX-5 is cheaper to maintain at $447/year versus $730/year for the Volkswagen Tiguan.
Is the Mazda CX-5 or Volkswagen Tiguan safer?
Both the Mazda CX-5 and Volkswagen Tiguan received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue