Last updated: 2026-07-17
Acura RDX vs Volvo XC60: Reliability Compared

Acura RDX

Volvo XC60
Choosing between the Acura RDX and the Volvo XC60? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two compact suvs.
Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Acura RDX currently leads with an average score of 78/100 compared to 74/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.
How Do the Acura RDX and Volvo XC60 Generations Compare?
Verdict
The Acura RDX is more reliable than the Volvo XC60, scoring 78/100 vs 74/100.
The Acura RDX edges out the Volvo XC60 in reliability with a slightly higher score of 76/100 compared to 74/100 for the XC60. While the RDX has a higher owner complaint rate at 13 per 10,000 units versus the XC60's 5.3, it benefits from significantly fewer recalls, with just 14 compared to the XC60's 42 over the same period. Additionally, the RDX offers lower estimated annual repair costs at $497, compared to $746 for the XC60. Overall, the Acura RDX presents a more reliable option with fewer recalls and lower maintenance expenses, despite a higher rate of owner complaints.
Key Differences
- 1Acura RDX costs $249 less per year to repair
- 2Acura RDX has 28 fewer total recalls
- 3Volvo XC60 has 7.7 fewer complaints per 10k sold
Category Scoreboard
Acura RDX vs Volvo XC60: Which Is More Reliable?
| Metric | Acura RDX | Volvo XC60 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability Score | 78/100 | 74/100 |
| Years Tracked | 8 | 8 |
| Total Recalls | 14 | 42 |
| Complaints per 10k Sold | 13 | 5.3 |
| Annual Repair Cost | $497/yr | $746/yr |
| Repair Frequency | 0.4/yr | 0.5/yr |
| Major Repair Risk | 6% | 7% |
| Safety RatingNHTSA overall | 2026 NHTSA | 2026 NHTSA |
| Frontal | ||
| Side | ||
| Rollover | ||
| Year Wins | 5 | 2 |
What Are the Common Problems With the Acura RDX and Volvo XC60?
The Volvo XC60 has a relatively high number of complaints related to the electrical system, with 81 total complaints and 5 linked to crashes, indicating a potentially severe issue in this area. In contrast, the Acura RDX shows a broader distribution of issues, with the highest number of complaints in the "Unknown or Other" category at 233, and significant visibility/wiper concerns at 148. The RDX also has notable engine-related complaints at 84, a problem category that is less pronounced in the XC60. Both models have a similar number of crash-linked complaints in their service brakes, but the RDX presents a more diverse range of problem areas, including power train and structure, each with crash-linked incidents.
| Component | Acura RDX | Volvo XC60 |
|---|---|---|
| UNKNOWN OR OTHER | 3.1Average | 0.5Very Low |
| ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | 0.8Very Low | 1.8Low |
| VISIBILITY/WIPER | 2Low | 0.2Very Low |
| ENGINE | 1.1Low | —None |
| POWER TRAIN | 1Very Low | 0.1Very Low |
| STRUCTURE | 0.8Very Low | 0.2Very Low |
| SERVICE BRAKES | 0.6Very Low | 0.4Very Low |
| STEERING | 0.4Very Low | 0.3Very Low |
| VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL | 0.4Very Low | —None |
| FUEL SYSTEM | 0.4Very Low | —None |
| FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM | 0.3Very Low | —None |
| VISIBILITY | 0.2Very Low | —None |
| BACK OVER PREVENTION | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| TIRES | —None | 0.2Very Low |
| AIR BAGS | 0.1Very Low | —None |
| FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| LANE DEPARTURE | —None | 0.1Very Low |
| SEATS | —None | —None |
| WHEELS | —None | —None |
| SUSPENSION | —None | —None |
| SEAT BELTS | —None | —None |
Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.
Which Is Cheaper to Maintain: Acura RDX or Volvo XC60?
How Does Acura RDX vs Volvo XC60 Reliability Compare by Year?
| Year | Acura RDX | Volvo XC60 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 87/1000R / 0C | 74/1003R / 4C | Acura RDX |
| 2025 | 81/1001R / 27C | 76/1004R / 22C | Acura RDX |
| 2023 | 82/1001R / 16C | 74/1005R / 40C | Acura RDX |
| 2021 | 77/1002R / 99C | 75/1005R / 31C | Acura RDX |
| 2020 | 67/1004R / 327C | 75/1006R / 17C | Volvo XC60 |
| 2019 | 66/1004R / 417C | 72/1008R / 33C | Volvo XC60 |
| 2018 | 79/1001R / 71C | 74/1005R / 35C | Acura RDX |
Best years to cross-shop: The 2026 Acura RDX scored 87/100 and the 2025 Volvo XC60 scored 76/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.
Who Should Buy the Acura RDX vs the Volvo XC60?
Acura RDX vs Volvo XC60: Common Questions
- Is the Acura RDX more reliable than the Volvo XC60?
- Based on our data, the Acura RDX is more reliable with an average score of 78/100 compared to 74/100. The difference is modest, so both are reasonable choices.
- Which has more recalls, the Acura RDX or the Volvo XC60?
- The Volvo XC60 has more recalls (42) compared to the Acura RDX (14). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
- Which has fewer owner complaints, the Acura RDX or the Volvo XC60?
- Adjusted for sales volume, the Volvo XC60 has a lower complaint rate at 5.3 per 10,000 vehicles sold versus 13 for the Acura RDX. Normalizing by sales gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
- Which is cheaper to maintain, the Acura RDX or the Volvo XC60?
- Based on independent repair cost estimates, the Acura RDX is cheaper to maintain at $497/year versus $746/year for the Volvo XC60.
- Is the Acura RDX or Volvo XC60 safer?
- Both the Acura RDX and Volvo XC60 received the same NHTSA overall safety rating of 5/5 stars. Check the frontal, side, and rollover sub-ratings above for a more detailed comparison.
Related Reliability Comparisons
More Acura RDX comparisons
Decided between Acura RDX and Volvo XC60? Run a VIN check before you buy — uncover hidden accidents, title issues, and open recalls.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
How We Calculate Reliability Scores
Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.
Key Ranking Factors
Complaint Severity
NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.
Repair Costs
Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.
Recall Impact
Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.
Issue Diversity
Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.
Scores are grouped into four tiers:
- 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
- 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
- 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
- 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution
Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.
See incorrect data? Report an issue