Last updated: 2026-04-09

Ram Promaster EV

0 Ram Promaster EV Years to Avoid

Years that score significantly below the Ram Promaster EV average of 0/100

All Ram Promaster EV years score consistently around the model average of 0/100 — no years are statistical outliers. The best year is 2025 0/100 and the weakest is 2024 0/100.

Verdict

All Ram Promaster EV years score consistently around the model average of 0/100 (0–0 range) — no years are statistical outliers. The best is 2025 0/100 and the weakest is 2024 0/100.

See best year ↓See all years ranked ↓
VIN History Report

Found a Safe Year? Check the Specific Car

Even the best Ram Promaster EV year can have hidden problems. A VIN check reveals past accidents, title issues, and service gaps for the exact car you're considering.

Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you. No VIN? Just hit “Check VIN” to look one up.

  • Accidents
  • Open Recalls
  • Title History
  • Odometer Rollback

All Ram Promaster EV Years by Generation

All model years ranked by reliability score, grouped by generation.

Ram Promaster EV Reliability Scores by Year

Excellent Good Mixed Risky

Our data covers 2024–2025 model years.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Ram Promaster EV years should you avoid?
All Ram Promaster EV years in our database score consistently around the model average of 0/100. No years are statistical outliers, though some are stronger than others.
What is the best year for the Ram Promaster EV?
The best year for the Ram Promaster EV is 2025, with a reliability score of 0/100 ("Risky"). It has 0 recalls and 0 owner complaints.
How many recalls does the Ram Promaster EV have?
Across all years in our database, the Ram Promaster EV has a total of 1 recalls. Recall counts vary by year — check individual model year reports for details.
Is a used Ram Promaster EV worth buying?
The Ram Promaster EV has mixed reliability across model years. If buying used, do thorough research on the specific year and budget for potential repairs.
Is the Ram Promaster EV reliable long-term?
The Ram Promaster EV has an average reliability score of 0/100 across all model years in our database, rated "risky". Reliability varies significantly by model year — choose carefully.
Is the 2025 Ram Promaster EV a good used buy?
Yes, the 2025 Ram Promaster EV is the highest-scoring model year with a reliability score of 0/100 ("Risky"). It has 0 recalls and 0 owner complaints, making it a solid used buy.

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent— Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good— Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed— Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky— Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue