Last updated: 2026-03-04

BMW X5 vs Toyota Grand Highlander: Reliability Compared

Choosing between the BMW X5 and the Toyota Grand Highlander? This page compares their reliability scores, NHTSA recall history, owner-reported complaints, and estimated annual repair costs so you can make a confident long-term ownership decision between these two midsize suvs.

Our reliability scores are based on NHTSA recall and complaint data, independent repair cost estimates, and sales-normalized complaint rates. The Toyota Grand Highlander currently leads with an average score of 75/100 compared to 60/100. Scroll down for the full year-by-year breakdown, common problem areas, and repair cost comparison.

Verdict

The Toyota Grand Highlander is more reliable than the BMW X5, scoring 75/100 vs 60/100.

Key Differences

  1. 1Toyota Grand Highlander has 53 fewer total recalls
  2. 2Toyota Grand Highlander scores 15 points higher in reliability
  3. 3BMW X5 has 1.9 fewer complaints per 10k sold

Category Scoreboard

1BMW X5
3Toyota Grand Highlander
Reliability ScoreTotal RecallsComplaint RateSafety Rating

BMW X5 vs Toyota Grand Highlander: Which Is More Reliable?

BMW X5 vs Toyota Grand Highlander at-a-glance reliability comparison
MetricBMW X5Toyota Grand Highlander
Reliability Score60/10075/100
Years Tracked93
Total Recalls6310
Complaints per 10k Sold6.38.2
Safety RatingNHTSA overall
2026 NHTSA
2026 NHTSA
Frontal
Side
Rollover
Year Wins02

What Are the Common Problems With the BMW X5 and Toyota Grand Highlander?

BMW X5 vs Toyota Grand Highlander common problem areas comparison
ComponentBMW X5Toyota Grand Highlander
POWER TRAIN0.9Very Low1.4Low
UNKNOWN OR OTHER0.6Very Low1.7Low
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM1.2Low0.6Very Low
AIR BAGS0.2Very Low1.1Low
SERVICE BRAKES1.1Low0.1Very Low
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM0.1Very Low0.6Very Low
ENGINE0.3Very Low0.2Very Low
STEERING0.3Very Low0.2Very Low
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING0.4Very LowNone
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROLNone0.4Very Low
SUSPENSIONNone0.4Very Low
STRUCTURENone0.2Very Low
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC)0.1Very LowNone
BACK OVER PREVENTION0.1Very LowNone
VISIBILITY/WIPER0.1Very LowNone
FUEL SYSTEM0.1Very LowNone
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCENoneNone
EXTERIOR LIGHTINGNoneNone
SEAT BELTSNoneNone
VISIBILITYNoneNone

Complaints per 10,000 units sold, aggregated across all tracked model years from NHTSA owner reports.

How Does BMW X5 vs Toyota Grand Highlander Reliability Compare by Year?

BMW X5 vs Toyota Grand Highlander year-by-year reliability scores
YearBMW X5Toyota Grand HighlanderEdge
202564/1004R / 49C80/1003R / 33CToyota Grand Highlander
202457/1007R / 134C69/1007R / 171CToyota Grand Highlander
2026(predicted)62/100(predicted)75/100(predicted)Toyota Grand Highlander

Best years to cross-shop: The 2025 BMW X5 scored 64/100 and the 2025 Toyota Grand Highlander scored 80/100 — these represent the strongest model years in our tracking range.

BMW X5 vs Toyota Grand Highlander: Common Questions

Is the BMW X5 more reliable than the Toyota Grand Highlander?
Based on our data, the Toyota Grand Highlander is more reliable with an average score of 75/100 compared to 60/100. That's a significant difference worth considering.
Which has more recalls, the BMW X5 or the Toyota Grand Highlander?
The BMW X5 has more recalls (63) compared to the Toyota Grand Highlander (10). More recalls don't always mean worse reliability — some are minor — but it's worth reviewing what each recall covers.
Which has fewer owner complaints, the BMW X5 or the Toyota Grand Highlander?
Adjusted for sales volume, the BMW X5 has a lower complaint rate at 6.3 per 10,000 sold versus 8.2 for the Toyota Grand Highlander. This per-sales normalization gives a fairer comparison than raw totals.
Is the BMW X5 or Toyota Grand Highlander safer?
Based on NHTSA crash test ratings, the Toyota Grand Highlander has a higher overall safety rating of 5/5 stars compared to 4/5 for the BMW X5. Check sub-ratings (frontal, side, rollover) above for a more detailed safety comparison.

How We Calculate Reliability Scores

Auto Reliability Index scores are calculated on a 0–100 scale using a weighted formula that combines multiple public data sources. Each factor is weighted based on its predictive value for real-world ownership experience.

Key Ranking Factors

1

Complaint Severity

NHTSA owner complaints weighted by component category (e.g., powertrain, safety systems, electronics, cosmetic) — safety-critical issues carry more weight than cosmetic ones. Adjusted for sales volume so high-volume models aren't unfairly penalized.

2

Repair Costs

Independent reliability ratings based on repair frequency, average repair costs, and severity of typical repairs for each model.

3

Recall Impact

Number of NHTSA recalls weighted by severity. “Stop driving” and fire-risk recalls are penalized more heavily than minor software or labeling recalls.

4

Issue Diversity

Measures how many major vehicle systems (engine, transmission, electrical, braking, etc.) have recorded complaints. A vehicle with issues spread across many systems may indicate systemic quality issues.

Scores are grouped into four tiers:

  • 80–100: Excellent — Top-tier reliability, minimal issues
  • 60–79: Good — Reliable with some minor concerns
  • 40–59: Mixed — Notable issues, research before buying
  • 0–39: Risky — Significant problems, proceed with caution

Data is sourced from NHTSA recall records, owner complaint filings, and independent repair databases. Scores are recalculated as new data becomes available. While the weighting model is proprietary, all underlying data sources are public and traceable.

See incorrect data? Report an issue